scientific fraud case

882 Words2 Pages

In contemporary society, scientists are having difficulties in doing free and honest researches and presenting truthful and factual publications. When seeking truth for science and money for a living, modern scientists would often need to ask themselves whether they should do this for the truth in public science or, for the security of their personal career. Unfortunately, with the difficult economy nowadays, many scientists tend to save their career over saving truth. In another words, many professional scientists today are doing research, since it affords them some respectful careers and a comfortable living. It is also undeniable that many scientists today work for publication rather than for truth. One major case of fraud in science can be seen through Eric Poehlman. Poehlman is now known as the first academic in America to be sentenced to prison for falsifying data in a grant application.
Up until 2005, Poehlman was an internationally recognised, full-time professor at the University of Vermont. His research fell within a wide range, which included: affects of exercise on obesity, obesity, metabolism, the physiological changes associated with menopause and the human aging process. Poehlman was in extremely good standing within his research fields, ultimately publishing over two hundred journal articles.
Unfortunately, soon enough, with developing suspicions from one of his research team member, Poehlman was accused of scientific fraud by a former lab technician, Walter DeNino, at the University of Vermont. As maintained by The New York Times, Poehlman has been presenting fraudulent data in lectures and in published papers, and has been using this data to obtain millions of dollars in federal grants from the National Instit...

... middle of paper ...

...lts and publishing fraudulent data. One major case of fraud in science was seen through Eric Poehlman, who was known as the first academic in America to be sentenced to prison for falsifying data in a grant application. And as a result of this, Poehlman was prohibited from receiving any future federal grants, and was told to write various corrections to his published journal articles. Furthermore, Poehlman’s scientific fraud case affected studies related to disease prevention, including research on the health of older men and women, the effect of diet, exercise, menopause status, hormone replacement, and disease status. Therefore, in order to prevent scientific fraud from happening again, the only way to stop this is to return to a system in which success depends not only on stacking piles of "good publications", but on whether their results stand the test of time.

Open Document