rhetorical analysis

747 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Homosexuality and challenges

Is homosexuality morally and biblically right? This a very hard question to answer with so many opinions. The question can be looked at with religions and general rights of an individuals. The society doesn’t openly accept homosexuals like they do of the heterosexual couples in America. My question to you is what makes it wrong and who are we to judge another human being. The analysis that I am going over is from a video of a man who ask questions and gives logical reasoning to common questions thrown at the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community. I feel that John Corvino provided a valuable and useful case on the morality of the community.
Corvino is the chairman of the department of philosophy at Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan. He is the author of What’s Wrong with Homosexuality and has spoken at hundreds of campuses on issues of homosexuality, ethics, and marriage. He is the co-author with Maggie Gallagher of Debating Same-Sex Marriage. Corvino is the recipient of numerous awards, including a 2012 Distinguished Professor of the Year Award from the Presidents’ Council of the State Universities of Michigan. Lastly he is an openly gay man and the rhetor of the video.
The occasion of this video was around the date of July 9, 2013. USA Today had a headline that stated “Gay-Marriage fight moves from Supreme court to States” on that same date. This news article was stating that the legal battle was going to lower courts because of a recent victory. I believe the audience in this video are people who think that homosexuality is immoral and biblically wrong specifically the justice system in this case. He is trying to get them to understand that they should have the same rights as every citizen in America.
The wa...

... middle of paper ...

...tates population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV. Corvino disputed the fact of the case study by saying homosexuality does not cause aids but the virus itself cause aids. The fact of the matter is that the virus can be passed down by homosexuals, heterosexuals, and a couples of other factors.
In my conclusion Corvino has changed my outlook on how I felt about the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and the transgender community. He used all the rhetorical concepts to persuade any viewer on his stand point of the homosexual community. He expressed reasonable answers that made logical sense and were so simple. I believe he really wants the average person to understand that if two consenting adults love each other regardless of gender that it shouldn’t be immoral. Lastly I believe that he wants us to judge people not on who they love but wither they love.

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis

    854 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.

    Read More

  • Into The Wild Rhetorical Analysis

    1626 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Proposal

    237 Words  | 1 Pages

    The article I have chosen for my rhetorical analysis is #Gamergate Trolls Aren’t Ethics Crusaders; They’re a hate group because it seemed interesting. The reason I was drawn to this article was because of the title, I was interested to know what it meant. This article, written by Jennifer Allaway, is about gamergate, an online gaming community, and the hate they show towards others. Jennifer does research on sexism in videogames and how it correlates to the gamers that play these games. She was collecting data from different organizations by using a questionnaire that gathered information on diversity in the videogame community. When some gamergate members

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis

    929 Words  | 2 Pages

    Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but

    Read More

  • The Laramie Project Play Analysis

    732 Words  | 2 Pages

    This play opened up people’s eyes on how many individuals around the country felt about homosexuals. It demonstrated the issues that cities in the United States had many issues with homosexuals in the area and shows the wrongs of not accepting them. On June 26, 2016, the United States legalized gay marriage in all 50 states. This shows that there has been progress with this social issue and more people are becoming aware of the fact that people can be whatever they

    Read More

  • Why Is Dallas Buyers Club Morally Wrong

    1363 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sexually promiscuity is morally wrong. The main cause of HIV is unprotected sexual relations. Actions like this usually have consequences which can be seen through Ron’s contraction of HIV (Simpson). Although this is a very severe and ultimately fatal outcome, it paints a painful picture of what

    Read More

  • rhetorical analysis

    684 Words  | 2 Pages

    The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.

    Read More

  • John Corvino's Arguments For The Morality Of Homosexuality

    971 Words  | 2 Pages

    He examines the core arguments against homosexual sex such as: it is abnormal, the idea that homosexuals choose to be that way, it goes against the purpose of our sexual reproductive organs, it is disgusting and how it goes against biblical teachings. He first looks at the meaning of homosexual sex being “unnatural”. It is hard for him to claim that one definition of natural is right compared to another person’s. He does argue against the idea of natural law theorists by saying that many things that are important in our society are not natural, and there are many natural things that people detest. He says, “If the unnaturalness charge is to be more than empty rhetorical flourish, those who levy it must specify what they mean”(Shafer-Landau 239). Disease and death are natural things that people do not like. Cancer is natural but no one believes that it is just or good. Then there are unnatural things people enjoy in life such as medications and a democratic government. These examples refer back to Corvino’s quote, challenging the true intentions of those who argue things based on naturalness. Another challenge to the naturalness of homosexuality is the idea that a homosexual person chooses to live that lifestyle, they were not born that way. It is hard to believe this is true however due to the fact that most heterosexuals cannot

    Read More

  • Let Chick-Fil-A Fly Free

    860 Words  | 2 Pages

    Each person has the right to choice whom they call love and call family. He makes the point that if you disagree with the homosexual life style, then you have the power to make the choice not to enter into that type of relationship. Just as with the choice to support or not to support Chick-Fil-A. He contends that if you agree with the statements of Mr. Cathy, that is your right to do so and you will support his business and no one should be able to subjugate that right. While if you are on the opposite side to the debate, you have the right to not give your money to Chick-Fil-A, and that the business will be effected in that

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Reflection

    828 Words  | 2 Pages

    Looking back at my rhetorical analysis in writing 150, to sum it up, it was horrendous. It became exceedingly obvious that I had skipped the prewriting step. Forgoing this step caused choppy sentences, multiple grammatical errors, and horrendous flow. The rough draft ended up looking like a collection of jumbled up words. The first attempted felt so bad, I started over entirely. After the review in class, I used the examples to focus my ideas and build off what other people had done. For example, the review helped me to clarify my knowledge and use of Kairos. Once done, it was peer reviewed by my group again. All the other group members commented that I had good ideas, but bad flow and grammatical errors. After revising their respective points and

    Read More

  • Aids In The Crucible

    419 Words  | 1 Pages

    Just as Arthur Miller, the writer of “The Crucible”, said, “Sex,sin, and the devil were early linked” (Miller,1125). During the AIDS hysteria, homosexual intercourse was thought to be the cause of widespread immune deficiency, so the disease was soon labeled “Gay Men’s Health Crisis” (“History of HIV and AIDS”). As time progressed AIDS, it was discovered, could also be spread through heterosexual couples(“History of HIV and AIDS”). This

    Read More

  • Authority in Lisa Cahill’s “Homosexuality"

    1158 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most difficult part of any modern theological debate is choosing the authority. With the variety of Christian denominations, individual thinkers, and outside influences, and it is often difficult to reach a general agreement. In her essay, “Homosexuality: A Case Study in Moral Argument,” Catholic theologian Lisa Cahill examines four major authorities and different ways to determine how they work together to produce a cohesive Christian ethic. Though she fails to give a definitive, quantifiable method of describing the interactions between the authorities, her final judgment, approval of some aspects of homosexuality, indicates that she values modern cultural context and general biblical themes over church tradition and specific biblical texts.

    Read More

  • Language, Power and Discourse of Sexuality: The case of Governor McGreevey

    1522 Words  | 4 Pages

    McGreevey exercises a great deal of power in choosing the things that he says in his speech and even the ways that he says them. He uses his words to benefit him. The majority of the speech sounds like a plea to the people of New Jersey and the American public. He asks for the audience to sympathize by speaking of his struggle and confusion. So, when McGreevey says, "And so my truth is that I am a gay American. And I am blessed to live in the greatest nation with the tradition of civil liberties, the greatest tradition of civil liberties in the world, in a country which provides so much to its people" the audience feels a pathos for him. This statement is a direct call for forgiveness and sympathy, even before they have heard the whole case. It calls for the American ...

    Read More

  • The Ethics of Homosexuality

    1649 Words  | 4 Pages

    My arguments will be ignoring a major element in factoring the morality of homosexuality, the law. Yes, many people know that stealing and murder are both wrong, but this is based on socialization and learning passed down from previous generations. The aim isn’t to ignore the rules, but examples from history relating to homosexuality will not aid in proving ground for its ethics. A rational, autonomous decision making process must be used in order to decipher right from wrong, which can lead to solid, concrete answers.

    Read More

  • Homosexuality in Today's Society

    1992 Words  | 4 Pages

    We have no right to judge. We should leave that to the Lord, and he will make the right decision. He will decide what the sinner does and doesn't deserve. Christians know what to abide by. They may know that being a homosexual is going against Gods word, but they also know that the Lord says that one should love all no matter what circumstances.

    Read More

More about rhetorical analysis

Open Document