Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on us gun history
History and the introduction of guns to the united states
History on gun control in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on us gun history
Position paper rough draft
Since the beginning of the colonies, gun control has been infringed upon our society. Great Britain attempted to ban all muskets which were considered the assault rifle of the time. They then placed restrictions and tried to confiscate all gun powder and prevent it from being shipped to the colonies. The colonists then switched to black powder, which was more unstable and had to be stored in special buildings that were called powder houses. These buildings were made out of thick layers of brick and were cool, dark, and dry. Muskets were considered a very dangerous weapon at the time, yet the colonists sought the rights to own weapons both personally and for their town militias. When America became a nation, the constitution and the bill of rights sought to protect this personal interest and several others.
The second amendment reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment was established to protect the rights of Americans to own weapons. Though the militia is necessary in this, the component that ties over to the present is the right of the people. Muskets were once considered as controversial as assault rifles are today, yet the founding fathers sought to protect the rights of Americans to own them. It is for these reasons that I support Pro-gun laws. As with any law, the line has to be drawn somewhere. Should people be able to own rocket launchers, armor penetrating rounds, or grenades? Probably not. This can be established with common sense and is a reasonable place to draw the line on what Americans can own. Things like assault rifles and high capacity magazines should not be...
... middle of paper ...
... easily getting ahold of these weapons. A national registry of weapons and more strict background checks would definitely help control who owns firearms. Almost all people agree that criminals and mentally ill people should not own firearms. By increasing the security in purchasing firearms and deeper background checks, this issue and the issue of shootings would drastically be reduced while maintaining the right of Americans to own the firearms they want to.
In conclusion, I believe that stricter background checks, mental illness laws, and gun tracking would drastically increase the safety of Americans while protecting the rights of citizens to own weapons like assault rifles, pump action shotguns, and handguns. Stricter mental illness laws are what needs to be focused on rather than ridding Americans of their firearms that are guaranteed by the second amendment.
Violence and crimes are growing in number and affecting American society. By reinforcing background checks we could reduce crimes and limit easy gun access to mentally ill people. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is a database where the names of people that have committed a misdemeanor, are mentally ill or drug abusers is kept to prevent them from attaining guns. Most criminals buy guns from unlicensed sellers at gun shows that don’t do properly background checks through the NICS, making it easier from criminals to purchase firearms. Another problem is missing records or information that was not reported to the background check system. Better background checks could reduce crime and gun violence in America.
One way gun control advocates have tried to reduce the number of guns being issued to citizens of the United States of America is to require background checks. Background checks are performed on some weapons but they want a full background check for felonies, mental issues, proper classes, safety precautions to name a few. Background checks would make sure that if you have any type of police record you will be given a second look and make sure that you are fit to own a gun. (Asa Best) If you have a record this does not mean that you will not be able to own a gun it may just mean that your ch...
Although the Second Amendment prevents the federal government from completely banning guns in America, limited restrictions are allowed on the distribution and possession of firearms. Certain groups of people such as criminals, the mentally unstable, and soldiers dishonorably discharged from the military are prohibited from possessing or interacting with firearms (Flynn). These restrictions are enforced by background checks in some states on both a state and federal level. However, gun laws vary from state to state and are often not thorough enough; the background checks are flawed due to lack of information and misinformation, and guns can easily end up in the hands of criminals and malevolent individuals. The ease of obtaining a firearm in America fosters crime and a dangerous environment. Hence, the Second Amendment should be reinterpreted so that stricter gun laws can be implemented because modern citizens do not require guns, current background checks are flawed, gun...
One of the most heavily debated subjects today in the United States is guns. Over the last few years, mass shootings and spree shootings have been covered widely in the media. It leaves many Americans wondering how we can just sit by and let this happen. However, this is no easy task to attempt to solve or something that will just go away overnight. Taking away the guns won 't solve anything or just fix the problem as a whole. The United States constitution not only protects, but guarantees the right to bear arms as an American citizen. Why should we let the acts of a few sick and mentally ill ruin the right for the rest of law abiding citizens. The focus should center more around tougher background checks and mental health. Many Americans,
It is believed that The Founding Fathers thought that the society benefited from guns being in the hands of the people. This way all citizens were able to defend themselves at all times.
On December 14th, 2012 in Newtown, Connecticut, Adam Lanza shot and killed twenty children, six staff members, and his own mother; this occurred because Adam Lanza was a man with a psychiatric illness with possession of many guns. If Adam Lanza did not have possession of this gun, twenty seven lives could have been saved. There are criminal background checks that take place in order to own a gun, however the government is missing one crucial aspect to it, and that is the medical background check. Even though there are laws against people with mental illnesses having guns, but the government has no way of checking if they have an illness because they do not conduct medical background checks to do so. Mass shootings by people with mental illness are a growing reoccurrence in the United States that needs to be prevented in order to save the lives of American citizens. People with psychiatric history should not be allowed to own guns because there is an increased risk of violence, people with psychiatric illness are not mentally stable, and the United States does not do proper screening and background checks for gun permits.
George Washington, one of the United State’s Founding Fathers once stated, “A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined…,” (Source 1). Many americans believe that guns should not be allowed in the United States. Firearms in general can be very dangerous and harmful, but the pros of guns are much greater than the cons. Guns should still continue to be allowed in the United States so citizens can protect themselves and the right to bear arms, but also for the use of harvesting game.
Take a look at the history of our country and the role guns have played in it. According to the second amendment gun ownership is perfectly legal and guaranteed as a right. There were and are good reasons for this, luckily they are still practiced today. Back in the day guns used to be for hunting and, on the occasion self defense. But when the colonists of this country had enough of British rule, they picked up there own personal guns and went to war and the British saw first hand how powerful the rough band of average American gun owners were. Our forefathers knew that the general population if armed would be key in winning the war. And it was.
Over the last 20 years mass shootings have become more common. More and more people are becoming concerned with guns, and the fact they are being used for killing innocent people. Over the past year we’ve had shootings in Orlando, Dallas, and multiple other cities. Many people have come to the conclusion that guns need to go. Others believe there should be background checks for every person who would like to purchase a firearm. Federal laws already prohibit some people from being able to purchase a weapon. The list includes convicted felons, immigrants without legal status, and people diagnosed with certain types of mental illness (“The Fight over Guns,” 2016). Guns should be a ton harder to buy than they are at the
The second amendment to the US Constitution shows that it is unconstitutional to have complete and total gun control. The second amendment states that “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This means that it is the right of an American citizen, abiding by the constitution, has the right to bear arms. Currently, there are over three hundred and seven billion people residing as American citizens. Within the homes of these Americans, forty five percent have a registered gun in their household. As a diverse nation, there are many reasons why there are guns located within a household. Sixty percent stated the gun is used for protection against int...
Background checks lay a big role in the ownership of guns and by applying stricter background checks it could most likely decrease the rate of gun crime. Even with stricter background checks criminals will still be able to obtain guns online or at private gun shows but if we were to say make private gun shows illegal that would prevent at risk people from obtaining firearms that are meant to do harm to others. Private gun shows now don’t have to do background checks and this causes a problem because we don’t know who they may be selling these firearms to and what the person they sell them to attends to do with them. With lack of background control within private gun shows there has been a proven increase of guns falling into the hands of criminals in and out of state. If we were to close this loophole by making private gun shows illegal or even making them have to do background checks like any other gun seller we would close the loophole and reduce the gun ownership to criminals and high risk
Fresh off of their separation from Great Britain, the Founding Fathers realized they could be creating the same beast Britain had become. It was important to them that citizens should be in control of their liberties, avoiding any type of tyranny on the governments behalf. The main issue we are dealing with here is; is it safe for guns to be obtainable by seemingly any adult? The two main purposes for a firearm at the beginning of our country’s existence were protection, and hunting. The early Americans had to use their weapons against wild animal attacks, and to put food on the table for their family. At this point in our evolution as a country, guns are not as necessary as they once were. We no longer need to go hunting to put food on the table, but the right to bear arms includes protecting myself and my family. Thomas Jefferson was an advocate for the second amendment, in a letter to James Madison in 1783 he wrote, "What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take
Guns are always represented as a sigh of terror, violence and insecurity due to which, gun control is always being a significant and controversial issue from both political and self defense point of view. Guns and humans had a shared part of the past history, during that period guns were used for hunting and protection from the invaders. The second amendment of the U. S. constitution even made the guns/arms more debatable on the basis of keeping guns as their right. Their is a no harm keeping a gun for self protection under a proper law and order, which will be regulated by different background, physical check and the awareness of proper use of the guns. These checks will help lower down the statistical data of misuse of firearms and reduce
The discussion about gun control is far-gone, and America should enact laws that will require gun owners to register their firearms. A background check on every citizen bearing a gun is necessary so that guns do not land in the arms of felons and the mentally ill. Thinking that people can use guns to fight for their liberty is a far gone idea that needs a second thought. However, gun control is not the only solution because it is necessary to educate the population on the risks of keeping guns and asking them to remit the guns at their own will.
Owning gun in the United State has a long history. Before the founding of United State, the early explorers and settlers found this new land that we called American, they hunted for food and protected their own by using guns. And they learned how to use gun when they were teenagers, then they taught their children when they were growing. After the founding of United State, the first law of gun is the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that was ratified in 1791. The second Amendment was legislated because they knew they could withstand U.K.troops and won the war of independence because of people’s militia owning gun. The Second Amendment states that "well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."