Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of communication in the army
Importance of communication to a military organisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Cellular phones can contribute a lot to our modern lives. It has made things very convenient by letting people communicate with others around the world almost instantaneously. One of the most used functions on the cell phone is not the phone, but the SMS text messaging. Why wouldn’t anyone want the ability to communicate instantaneously? With the use of this technology comes a different method of accountability. This is taking responsibility for that which falls under your domain. This is important when communicating with a supervisor. When an SMS message is received, it is professional courtesy to respond as soon as possible. That notwithstanding, SMS messaging is an unreliable technology with an average 1%-5% error or deliverability rate. …show more content…
Militaries have been designed as a massive machine. This means that every single person within that machine absolutely must be accountable for his or her actions or the entire thing may break down. None of it would be possible without good communication and …show more content…
There is a well-defined and rigid hierarchical structure within the military. This is referred to often as the chain of command. The best way to visualize this is to picture a chain—you can only get up or down by using the next link. You should always exercise professional courtesy by informing the next link in the chain unless absolutely necessary due to continues harassment or is you feel your career is in jeopardy. This chain of command will not work if you could not rely on each person in the structure to be entirely accountable for everything. When an order is given or a tasking comes down, the person handing them down doesn’t question whether or not they will be able to carry them out; it’s simply assumed. When a person does not do this and a negative consequence occurs, they can potentially be flagged and adverse action taken. Again, this is only in cases where a lawful order is given. If the infraction is serious enough, someone can be separated under various paragraphs, depending on how much damage has been done. In the cases of reprisal, the transgressor may faces charges including but not limited article, 93 cruelty and maltreatment of a subordinate, article 92 failure to obey a lawful order, or article 117 provoking speeches or
1. Army Regulation 25-50 is the only authorized reference for this memorandum. This is a memorandum THRU MILITARY POLICE ADVANCED LEADERS COURSE, FOR YOUR Company Commander.
Powers, Rod. About.com, US Military. Military Orders: To Obey or Not to Obey? N.D. Web. 6 November 2011.
Earlier in March 2014 the senior leadership of the Air Force, to include the Secretary of the Air Force, the Chief of Staff, and the Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force, made a statement to all airmen. They stated that “being an Airman is more than a job, when we voluntarily raised our right hands and took an oath to support and defend the Constitution, we became members of the profession of arms”, they also said that along with our profession of arms we are given and accept a sacred trust given to us by the American people, that to be worthy of this trust we must “build our lives and shape our service on the foundation of our core values”, and that when Airmen fail to live up to our core values, the reputation of all who serve is tarnished” (letter to airman, Mar 2014). Recently, I was tasked to deliver a briefing for the J3 monthly training day. This tasking was a result of my negligence in updating a certain system that is vital to the J3 watch floor. My briefing, although filled with correct information and guidance, was also slaked with profanity and unprofessional gestures. Regardless of any circumstances that may have been the cause for these actions, the actions needed correction. Correction was given, which was responded to by more profanity and provoking actions. After I showed such disrespect to my non-commissioned officer in charge, he escorted me to my supervisor and my actions were made known to him. During this time I was still acting very contentious and disrespectful, making snide comments and standing with such contempt as if to say “are you done now”. This of course escalated into more serious action by my leadership which very well could have been avoided had I done my duty correctly in the first place. The...
They told the Army to only listen to them and not the PG; this meant
having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by any member of the armed forces , which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or
Times have changed. Things are done differently these days, including in romantic relationships. Instead of getting a love letter, boyfriends or girlfriends get love texts. Texting can be beneficial for making small plans, but it tends to decrease the intimacy for the couple. It can create issues that may or may not be resolved, but would have been less likely to be created had it not been for texting. Texting can lead to silly misunderstandings, make the partners feel like they always need to be in contact with each other, create a tendency to resolve problems and express feelings without being face-to-face, and make them wonder if they really have their partner’s attention or not.
Although the idea that texting and online communication is weakening our ties to actually being able to have face to face communication is common, it is not so true and I agree with Stobierski in that this social form has both positives and negatives, but the repercussions of texting and online communication ultimately outweigh the bright side.
In recent years texting has become one of the most popular ways to stay in touch with the people around you. Texting is something that occurs every day and almost everyone does it. One of the
In conclusion, texting and emailing are similar and different in a variety of ways. If one wants to send a letter to an old friend, email would be the best option. However, if one want to reach a friend immediately, texting would be the swiftest option. No matter what people use, they are both equally capable of delivering messages to and fro. Different people have different methods of sending a message. However, overall, these efficient ways of sending messages are used everyday.
Even though texting has its flaws, it also has its success, it might be a problem that texting is so advanced that now we have emojis to the point that we are able to make a whole sentence out of them, but texting also helps us get a message to each other faster. Again we text how we speak, when we’re in front of our friends we speak in our comfortable ways, while we’re texting we speak in our comfortable ways, instead of saying: I think that the exact length of the pole will be equivalent to the exact length of the building, and the amount of pressure that the pole can hold will be able to withstand the weight of the building, we probably will just say something along the lines of: I think the pole is big enough to hold up the building and pole will be able to hold up the building. Those two sentences are saying the same thing, but one sentence is one that we would use in front of our boss, and one is one that we would use on the phone or in front of our friends, there is no problem with both of these sentences, but only one would be accepted in a professional matter. So it's not that texting is a horrible thing, but that texting is used more for loose language and not for educating language as much In other words, our way of speech in texting is not really a professional way of
Texting is probably the most popular form of communications now a days, however before texting became possible people were stuck with simple phones that couldn't move around very far. Texting is a great way to get to know a person, and you don't have to worry
Texting is a lot more private and if you are in a public place you are not distracting other people by talking on the phone. You can also have an argument with someone via text without anyone knowing it. Can you imagine the attention you get by fighting with someone over the phone? You will probably turn heads and get some nasty stares. Besides, you can also get more things done while you text aside from talking on the
I have noticed that nowadays people are relying on texting more than calling people and engaging in a conversation on the phone. Many people argue that texting is a much easier way to communicate. Although some people may argue that texting is better, many people believe calling is a much more efficient way of long distance communication. I favor calling over texting because you can hear their voice, you won’t lose your communication skills, and I believe it can be quicker than texting in most circumstances.
...parable to any technology, texting has advanced throughout its existence. Sending and receiving text messages is a part of everyday life. Back to those who lived during the dark ages, it was arduous to get in touch with friends. People mainly used papers and a pen to write letters and shipping mails, used birds to carry messages, and used telegrams to communicate. Now, with new forms of communications, people could stay in touch easily and get immediate feedbacks. From the research I have conducted, it can be concluded that texting has evolved significantly since it was invented to what it is now, a huge part of many modern world countries that plays a role in many lives. It was not difficult to understand the technology of texting since many of us uses it every day. Much of the information found about the evolution of texting was interesting and easily understood.
Texting has negative and positive influences on society. In 1984, Friedhelm Hillebrand and Bernard Ghillebaert developed the concept of SMS (short message service) in the Franco- German GSM cooperation (Erickson). Text messaging was created and released in the mid-1990’s. Texting, also known as SMS, is a form of communication in which it sends text messages between cell phones and other handheld devices (Erickson). In present day, texting has become a large part of connecting with people we know in our daily life. If texting were not created, where would we be currently in interacting with each other? What would be the fastest form of communication? Would we be able to adapt the new community without texting? Throughout history, we perceive technological advances and their effects on society as we try to eliminate our usage in them.