paper

1470 Words3 Pages

Strategic Therapy versus Structural Therapy Strategic and Structural therapy is two forms of therapy that offer similarity as well as difference treatment to assist the family with communicating more effective with each other. The therapist goal is to find creative interventions to help stabilize the family to maintain an appropriate relationship in their environment. Within this paper, a brief description of the similarity and difference of structural and strategic therapy will demonstrate how two forms of behavior therapy can assist families by changing the behavior. Compare and Contrast. The concept of Structural family therapy is how the therapist “view the family as a system structured according to set patterns and rules that govern family interactions” (2003, Gehart & Tuttle, p. 23). The therapist goal is to interact with the clients during the therapy session to obtain an understanding of the reported problem. This process will allow the therapist to assist the clients with changing their structure. Strategic family therapy concept is to attempt to address a specific problem of the family in a shorter timeframe than other therapeutic services. Both approaches strive to assist the clients with overcoming their family issues, however views the structure of the family differently. For example, structural approach works with the family by identifying the problems and improving the behavior with and strategic therapy works with changing the client behavior to improve the problem. Both, structural and strategic therapy has goals toward assisting the clients. Structural approach goals is to “alter the dysfunctional structure to promote problem solving and to facilitate the growth of the system to resolve symptoms and encourag... ... middle of paper ... ... member connects with each other will allow the therapist to have an idea of where the problem origin. I find myself using similar approach when conducting an intake or assessment to determine the diagnosis and causes of diagnosis. Strategic approach appears to work effectively with some clients, however I believe it may encourage negative behavior to some. For example, a father telling his son to wash their car outside at their house and the son drives the car to a drive through wash and obtain several scratches. When the father confronts the son about his defiant behavior, the son reacts by yelling and reporting that he can do what he want to do. The son has demonstrated role confusion. Although either approach may assist the clients with stabilizing the family relationship, it is my opinion that structural approach aligns more with my idea of change.

Open Document