locke essay

789 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Poverty inequality and unequal distribution of wealth essay 123

In his article, Now That’s Rich, Paul Krugman discusses the state of the wealthy in America. He provides a critical account of the work ethic of the 1 percent, asserting that many of the country’s wealthy do not work in proportion to the money they have. He states, “The goal of [promoting the rise in college graduates] is to soften the picture, to make it seem as if we’re talking about ordinary white-collar professionals who get ahead through education and hard work. But many Americans are well-educated and work hard…Yet they don’t get the big bucks.” This claim illustrates a disparity in the economic system: hard work does not equate financial success. Krugman expands on this by explaining that wealth acquired by this group of people was only achieved because money they inherited. “These days a lot of top money managers’ income comes not from investing other people’s money but from returns on their own accumulated wealth—that is, the reason they make so much is the fact that they’re already very rich.” Krugman demonstrates a cyclical pattern of accumulated wealth, leaving no room for individuals of lower means to reach this status. Moreover, the advantage of the rich leads to a society that is “dominated by wealth,” and increases the gap between the rich and every one else. Krugman ultimately points out the hypocrisy of the rich’s resistance to increased taxes and asks his readers to think critically about how the rich arrived where they are. 
 Upon reading Krugman’s article, I find myself both agreeing and disagreeing with the arguments he makes. The income disparity between the rich and poor is an issue as it perpetuates a society run by the few rather than the majority. If the 1 percent, or .01 percent, have the majority of p...

... middle of paper ...

...this responsibility is blurred in a money economy because money never spoils, so there is no definite line on how much is considered excess. I do believe that individuals have a responsibility to one another as citizens, which is why government is important in regulating these responsibilities. However, it has no justification to take away that which rightfully belongs to another man.
I find that many of the arguments Krugman raises infringes on the right to an individual’s property. He argues that the rich are undeserving of their praise as “economic heroes.” While I agree that there is an injustice in the influence of the minority rich over the majority, these individuals have taken advantage of what they were given, and worked themselves into this position. It would be wrong to take that away.

Works Cited

Kramer, Isaac. "The Portable Enlightenment Reader."

Show More
Related

  • The Death Of Horatio Alger Analysis

    274 Words  | 1 Pages

    To prove his point, Krugman explains that about forty years ago (thought to be because of the New Deal) the United States was mainly a middle class society with opportunities move up in the class rankings. In contrast, today's society leads americans to believe that income is a fluctuating thing; one year you

    Read More

  • Of The 1 % Ethos Pathos Logos

    728 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nobel Prize winner, professor, author and economist, Joseph E. Stiglitz, wrote “Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%.” Joseph E. Stiglitz served during the Clinton administration as chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers and is former senior vice president and chief economist of the World Bank. Throughout his piece Stiglitz argues how America’s economy is not likely to succeed in the future. Stiglitz creates a strong and credible argument throughout his piece by using the appeals of ethos, pathos and logos.

    Read More

  • Making The American Dream In Nickel And Dimed

    726 Words  | 2 Pages

    While she was working the minimum wage life she would talk about the rich as selfish people who struck luck and got all their money that way. She says, “ Since the rich have become more numerous, thanks largely to rising stock prices and executive salaries” (Ehrenreich 109). She explains that the rich are becoming more numerous as a result of stocks and executive salaries growing. The New York Times says, "Data Reveal a Rise in College Degrees Among Americans” (Rampell 1). The article says that more and more Americans are earning college degrees over the years. This is the reason why the successful are

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis Of Confronting Inequality By Paul Krugman

    745 Words  | 2 Pages

    We, as Americans, view inequality one way, while Krugman perceives it rhetorically. This rhetorical view represents his signal to us, stating the fact that our society changes continuously. “The America I grew up in was a [...] middle class society. Over the past generation,

    Read More

  • Analysis Of John Locke: The Second Treatise Of Government

    2379 Words  | 5 Pages

    John Locke is considered one of the best political minds of his time. The modern conception of western democracy and government can be attributed to his writing the Second Treatise of Government. John Locke championed many political notions that both liberals and conservatives hold close to their ideologies. He argues that political power should not be concentrated to one specific branch, and that there should be multiple branches in government. In addition to, the need for the government to run by the majority of the population through choosing leaders, at a time where the popular thing was to be under the rule of a monarch. But despite all of his political idea, one thing was extremely evident in his writing. This was that he preferred limited

    Read More

  • Book Review Of Domhoff's Who Rules America?

    1008 Words  | 3 Pages

    By using the points listed previously, it is evident that a small portion of the population control what policies are implement in America and hold most of the nation’s wealth. I believe this two factors, the wealth one possesses and the amount of control an individual has, are interconnected. America has become a nation where money can get you anyway because it significantly increases the amount of opportunities available to the individual. Many people can attest to the presence of this class, including individuals from Kansas City who participated in a cross-section study with detailed interviews. The citizens of Kansas City referred to these people as “big rich” or “blue bloods” (pg

    Read More

  • A Classless Society In Mantsios's Class In America

    1410 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Mantsios’ “Class in America” he provides us with four myths about the United States. In one of these myths the idea is brought up that the United States is, at its core, a classless society. It is also states that whether rich or poor, everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. The myth also states that health care and education are provided to everyone regardless of their financial stability. This idea about a classless society is exactly what Mantsios claims it to be, a myth. It is untrue to state that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law, and to believe that whatever differences exist in financial standing are insignificant. There are clear distinctions between different groups of people depending on their economic and social standing.

    Read More

  • Summary: Income Inequality In America

    1137 Words  | 3 Pages

    Further arguments bolster the defense of this perception regarding income inequality. Writers, such as The New York Times Tyler Cowen, add wood to the fire in his articles written about this topic. As a proponent of this view, Cowen (2015) argues that income inequality should not be the main concern and rather than to try and bridge the gap between the wealthy and lower classes, the country should turn its' attention to the problem of economic mobility as the real issue. The argument made by Cowen slightly parallels the argument made by Garret in that income inequality will never cease to exist, but we as a nation can reduce it by defeating what Cowen (2015) believes the underlying cause to be; economic mobility. Instead of taking a communist approach to the situation with taking money from the wealthy class and distributing it to the less fortunate, Cowen (2015) proposes that by uprooting the financial instability of the lower class the government can thrust them into higher economic status. CNBC writer Carol Roth also provided another argument. Roth (2014) is very blunt and to the point in her article regarding the problem, or there lack of, income inequality in the United States starting by stating the harsh reality that life is not equal for many Americans in a variety of circumstances. Counteracting the argument of citizens that believe there is income inequality and that there needs to be a redistribution of wealth, Roth (2014) says,

    Read More

  • Essay On John Locke And Adam Smith

    616 Words  | 2 Pages

    Andy Smith J. Ward February 17, 2014 History 102 Revolutionary Thinkers Locke versus Smith John Locke and Adam Smith were critically acclaimed to be revolutionary thinkers and their thoughts and reasons have very good reasons backed up with ways to describe the Economy and the Government as inefficient or wrong in their Era of their lifetime. John Locke and Adam Smith are both believers that the government should be active in supporting social and political change in the economy. Both Locke and Smith’s thoughts can be equally said revolutionary in comparison, but in terms of what era they lived in and more history that has happened to see more mistakes to correct what happened and possible future outcomes for a clear revolutionary though I believe Adam Smith’s ideas were more revolutionary and his dominant ideas that have helped what we think is the way we do things in todays economy. Smith's influential work, The Wealth of Nations, was written based on the help with the country’s economy who based it off his book. Smith’s book was mainly written on how inefficient mercantilism was, but it was also written to explain what Smith thought was to be a brilliant yet complicated idea of an economic system based on the population and the social ladder.

    Read More

  • Inequality in America

    562 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the United States there are four social classes : the upper class, the middle class, the working class, and the lower class. Of these four classes the most inequality exists between the upper class and the lower class. This inequality can be seen in the incomes that the two classes earn. During the period 1979 through the present , the growth in income has disproportionately grown.The bottom sixty percent of the US population actually saw their real income decrease in 1990 dollars. The next 20% saw medium gains. The top twenty percent saw their income increase 18%. The wealthiest one percent saw their incomes rise drastically over 80%. As reported in the 1997 Center on Budget's analysis , the wealthiest one percent of Americans ( 2.6 million people) received as much after-tax income in 1994 as the bottom 35 percent of the population combined (88 million people). But in 1977 the bottom 35 percent had about twice as much after tax income as the top one percent. These statistics further show the disproportional income growth among the social classes. The gr...

    Read More

  • Inequality And Wealth Inequality

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    Krugman points out how despite the obvious and ever growing gap between the rich and middle class in terms of wealth increase, Republicans tend to vote for tax cuts for the rich and for decreases in funding for programs that benefit the middle and lower classes of society, such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Cutting funds for these services puts the middle and lower classes at even more of a disadvantage than they already were. Meanwhile, the rich receiving more tax cuts means they receive more money, furthering the economic wealth gap and increasing the money they can spend to influence politics. Krugman suggests the solution to the problem is increasing taxes on the

    Read More

  • Wealth Inequality In America Essay

    1109 Words  | 3 Pages

    Inside of this video, this guy really targets an issue nobody has really been presented. He shows charts that talk about how we Americans think our wealth is distributed. We think distribution is doing alright. Americans think that the bottom 40% is getting a bit of money. They also believe that the middle class is doing reasonably well. Unfortunately, that is not the case. In the video, he breaks it down a little bit getter. He shows a graph that shows how money is actually being distributed. The poorest of poor don 't even register on the poverty line. The middle class is barely making it. And then there is this huge difference between "the rich" and the poor. It is proven that the 1% of America has 40% of the entire nation 's wealth ("Wealth Inequality in America."). The bottom 80% of America only share 7% of the nation 's wealth among themselves. The top 1% has 50% of the stocks, bonds, and mutual funds. The bottom 50% of Americans only own 0.5% ("Wealth Inequality in America."). The poor is not just getting by but they are scraping and fighting to get by. Now that it is clear that there is a lot of poor people in America, it is important to figure out how to fix

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Capitalism In Today's Society

    1508 Words  | 4 Pages

    Divisions within the social stratum is a characteristic of societies in various cultures and has been present throughout history. During the middle ages, the medieval feudal system prevailed, characterized by kings and queens reigning over the peasantry. Similarly, in today’s society, corporate feudalism, otherwise known as Capitalism, consists of wealthy elites dominating over the working poor. Class divisions became most evident during America’s Gilded Age and Progressive era, a period in time in which the rich became richer via exploitation of the fruits of labor that the poor persistently toiled to earn. As a result, many Americans grew compelled to ask the question on everyone’s mind: what do the rich owe the poor? According to wealthy

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Paul Krugman's 'Confronting Inequality'

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    The America I grew I up in almost had a equal middle class society ( Krugman 586). In this quote, Krugman is letting the reader know that the middle class society was once his life, and that he can connect with the middle class society. Then, in the next couple of sentences, Krugman goes on to say how he noticed it has changed. From this, it is obvious that Krugman has paid attention to what’s been going on in the middle class society, and that a member of the middle class society could take interest in his statements. A middle class reader would most likely believe what Krugman is saying due to the fact, he has been where the reader is once in his life.  Later on in the chapter, Krugman puts a little of himself in his writing by using the acronym “RDK (rich dumb kids).”  When he makes this statement, it is apparent that Krugman is being honest in his writing. Throughout the chapter, Krugman uses words like I, our, we.  Also, Krugman demonstrates that he actually has knowledge and has studied economics thoroughly. As much as I would like to see the United states give a bigger percentage of GDP to social spending beyond health care, it’s probably have to wait until liberals are stronger in the government and are using it to make people’s lives better and safer ( Krugman 598). It was clear that Krugman’s knowledge is in his writing, so the reader is more likely to trust what Krugman is saying.

    Read More

  • The Distribution of Wealth

    877 Words  | 2 Pages

    Everyone has his or her own ideas of how wealth should be distributed properly. Some people believe wealth should be left to family, left for public services, or become the property of others. Others believe that people should not have excess wealth, resulting in non-existent class distinctions. An alternative view is that wealth is not distributed; instead, the wealthy continue to grow wealthier while those in poverty can not escape it and fall further into a life of poverty. The beliefs discussed above come from three different writers. Those writers include Andrew Carnegie, Karl Marx, and Robert B. Reich. These writers all have different opinions on how wealth should be distributed properly.

    Read More

More about locke essay

Open Document