Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Apartheid in South Africa -- Historical Context
Negative effects from imperialism
Negative effects from imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Apartheid in South Africa -- Historical Context
Imperialism in South Africa
Throughout the course of Africa’s history, imperialism is one of the biggest transformations that could have happened. More specifically, South Africa. Though it happened almost one hundred and eighty years ago, we are still capable of seeing the different impacts it had on modern South Africa. You should care about the effects of imperialism because you can still see the different effects imperialism has had on South Africa. But, did imperialism have a positive or negative impact on modern South Africa? I believe that though imperialism has had some positive impacts, most of the outcomes were negative. I believe this for several reasons.
To begin with, no one has ever really been treated equally. Everyone who was non- white was segregated until 1994. This was called apartheid. Apartheid was a system of discrimination based on your race. If you were colored, you were required to follow certain rules. This included; carrying a pass (or legal documents), following specific curfews, and understanding that you were never going to be equal to white people. While the country was mostly made up of colored men and woman, all the power was held by governing white people. While the policy was lifted in 1994, thanks to a man named Nelson Mandel, the entire country still struggles for equality. An example of how it’s still not equal is jobs and money. Since the apartheid, the rise of unemployment has doubled. And a lot of the times, white people refuse to higher colored men because of their racial differences. And even if you are given the opportunity to work, your salary is still lower than white people. This has impacted South Africa because most of the population is colored. About 9 % of the ...
... middle of paper ...
...s imperialism. While it’s true, that imperialism did bring education to Southern Africa, only selected citizens were chosen to receive that education a couple decades ago. The reason why this is important is because it’s one of the reasons poverty still exists today. While education is being given out today, a few decades ago it was scarce for men of color. So those who didn’t receive education before received lower paying job or no job at all. This is just another challenge that South Africa is trying to face that is still connected to imperialism.
In conclusion, you are still able to see the different affects that imperialism had on South Africa. While there were some positive effects of imperialism, most of them are negative. I think Southern Africa would have been better off if Great Britain hadn’t tried to interfere in their country. What do you think?
So in conclusion, imperialism did Egypt more bad than good. It seems that they were right to try and prevent European dominance. Imperialism did improve on the general economic state of Egypt, and some other benefits that are similar to other colonies, like longer life expectancies. But with that came even more disadvantages; the major ones were the famines and the taxes, and the more general problems like new diseases being introduced, culture breaks, etc. Based on simple statistics, it can be established that imperialism did more harm than good for the colonies. Without imperialism, we wouldn’t live the same way we do now, but was it worth the countries and lives that were ruined during the process?
It is important to have some information about the organization that the strategic planning will cover. This section of the strategic plan gives a rapid review of the organization in order to understand the circumstances that the organization is performing in.
When one thinks of imperialism they often refer to the concept with very strong feelings. The general population will either agree with it or disagree. There tends to be no middle ground. The best way to look at imperialism is with an impartial mind. If one looks at imperialism with an open mind then they are able to see both the strengths and the weaknesses that it harbors. Throughout history one is most likely able to name several circumstances where imperialism took place and also point out the obvious aftermath of. Imperialism tends to have a greater good behind it, but unfortunately may have been executed poorly.
Modern imperialism can be described that is was never good. When a nation took over a smaller nation for economic, political, or social reason, they were imperialistic, creating the oppressors and oppressed system of the mother and colonized nations. As expected they changed the modern world plenty and pretty much made it a harder world to live during that time. It depends on a person’s point of view. Some may think it was positive overall, but it only led to things in this world that were negative. Even though modern imperialism occurred more than 100 years ago, it still affects us on how our nations were broken down.
A true saying is “Colonization often does more damage than contribution.” Colonialism encouraged Africa’s development in some areas, but in many others it severely damaged the natural progress of the continent. If colonialism was never imposed on Africa, Africa’s developments would be significantly different and many of the problems that the continent faces now would not exist today. In conclusion, at first it seems that colonialism has both positive and negative effects, but the truth is it only damages the colonized nation.
When the Europeans arrived in Africa, many would of thought that imperialism wasn?t fied because the Europeans were enslaving the Africans. As stated in David Diop's An Anthology of West African Verse, "And in the Conqueror's voice said, 'Boy! A chair, a napkin, a drink.'" Stated blatantly, the "conqueror" is a European, and he is commanding an African to serve him. Forcing Africans into slavery certainly doesn?t justify European imperialism in Africa, however, there are many reasons as to why imperialism actually was justified.
Throughout the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, almost every country in Africa was imperialized by other countries in Europe. To imperialize is to conquer another country, whether it be in the means of politics, economics and/or culture, and control that land. The aftermath for the imperialized country was either beneficial or harmful. The amount of African countries that a European country imperialized varied. Great Britain imperialized fifteen countries in Africa, including Egypt in 1882, Sierra Leone in 1808, and the Union of South Africa in 1910. Although Great Britain’s reasons to imperialize were selfish, Britain helped each country progress afterwards.
When the Age of Imperialism began in 1875, it effected Africa in many ways. Nowhere was the competition for colonies more intense than in Africa. Europeans went after North and South Africa splitting up the continent. Egypt and Sudan were taken over by Britain to obtain the Suez Canal. Imperialism helped to develop Africa’s economy and turned it into a continent of colonies.
Even before the eve of the Revolution, the colonists constantly had the image of independence lingering in the back of their heads. The colonists felt that they were first on a loose leash, and as that leash tightened over the years, the colonists began to understand their true culture and identity. As time passed, the colonists developed a greater sense of their identity and unity as Americans and by the eve of the Revolution, even though at first the colonists were unorganized and had problems with being united, they remained determined to gain their identity and unity as Americans.
British imperialism on India had many positive and negative affects on both the mother country, Britain and the colony, India. Many people would argue which effects were more prominent in these countries and some would agree that they were equal. But in both cases there were actually both.
During Imperialistic times South Africa was a region of great resources that was greatly disputed over (Ellis). Europe’s main goal during these times was to compete against each other and played a “game” of which country can imperialize more African countries than the other. Imperialism was a curse to South Africa, because many wars, laws, and deaths were not necessary and would not have happened if South Africa were not imperialized.
Apartheid consisted of a set of unequal laws that favored the whites (“History of South Africa in the apartheid era”). The Race Classification Act, which divided everyone into four race groups, whites, blacks, coloreds, and Indians were the first of many major laws (Evans, 8). Hundreds of thousands of black South Africans were forced to leave their homes and move into special reservations called “homelands” or Bantustans that were set up for them (Evans, 8). There were twenty-three million blacks and they were divided into nine tribal groups, Zulu, Xhosa, Tswana, North and South Sotho, Venda, Tsonga, Swansi, and South Ndebele, and each group were moved into a separate homeland (Evans, 8). Another major law was the Groups Area Act, which secluded the twenty-three million blacks to 14 percent of land, leaving 86 percent of the land for the 4.8 million (Evans, 9). Under apartheid laws a minority ...
Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and then colonized those countries to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling countries to use the weaker countries for their resources. Colonizing other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries “scrambled” for Africa, it seemed as though Africa had no say in anything. During the 19th century, Europe found a way to use Africa for their own growth and power. Using Africa for their resources, the Europeans colonized Africa without a second thought. European imperialism in Africa had a negative impact because of social disarray, cultural loss, and death it caused.
An overwhelming majority of African nations has reclaimed their independence from their European mother countries. This did not stop the Europeans from leaving a permanent mark on the continent however. European colonialism has shaped modern-day Africa, a considerable amount for the worse, but also some for the better. Including these positive and negative effects, colonialism has also touched much of Africa’s history and culture especially in recent years.
I define history as important events that have happened in the past, and the ones that are presently happening. At some time or another everything will be considered history. History tells a story, whether it’s written, painted, carved, or sung; a collection of events that someone explains to you that is usually important.