A CRITIQUE OF SELF DETERMINATION THEORY
INTRODUCTION
The complexity of doing business is ever increasing particularly in a globalised world, that is characterised by reshaping the business world(Thompson 1995).Todays world business leaders could not have sustained their leadership position without due cognisance of the strength of their competitors and ensuring that their employees ability match the needs of their customers. However Hammer and Champy (1993) noted that today’s customers determine the future of organisation by determining what they want, when and they want it.
Essentially the self determination of the founder of easyjet through his transformational leadership has enabled the realisation of the company. Genevieve S et al (2012) highlight that self-determination theory is a motivational mechanism that drive individuals to perceive themselves as displaying transformational leadership behaviour. Evidence suggest that the investment of the founder of easyjet in shipping business failed due to disaster having invested 30 million pounds and sold the business for 1.3billion pounds(Wikipedia 2014).The unique ability that the founder of easyjet possess impact on the employee and perhaps seen as the driving force in sustaining the success. The business model adopted by EasyJet originated from the United State Southwest Airline Co, that was established in1967,its unprecedented success has earned the reputation as the world largest low cost airline. The leadership style in its entirety is only valuable in profit oriented organisation when it is entrepreneurial in nature; therefore leadership within this context recognise that heroic acts of performance by subordinates in organisation is dependent upon the charisma and entrepr...
... middle of paper ...
...desired outcomes. While relatedness in the opinion of Luyck et al.,(2008) is a need of establishment, a connection with important others Genevie`ve..In the workplace, autonomous motivation has been linked to employee performance (Kuvaas, 2009) and commitment (Gagne´, Chemolli, Forest, &Koestner, 2008),Autonomous motivation is a self-endorsement and control of ones behaviour, an initiation of ones volition. It encompasses the ability to freely engage in an action for its inherent satisfaction because the individual concern identified with its value.
CONCLUSION
The self-determination theory suggests that leadership style and vision could motivate subordinates in organisation where such leadership creates an environment that fosters autonomy, develops competence and encourages relatedness through interpersonal relationship for the realization of the company objectives.
Autonomy is the free-will, and/or the independence of the individual to act without guidance from another factor. Competence is having the ability or confidence to perform efficiently. For instance, a competent employee needs little motivation from his/her superior when compared to someone who is incompetent of his/her position. Lastly, relatedness is a need for companionship, or an emotional connection. Employees need to have a common ground and something to relate to their immediate supervisor, this causes workers to feel more equal and comfortable. By maximizing each of these three psychological needs, the individual becomes more self-determined and motivation improves, as well as the reward appears more
Achieving organizational goals is the motivation rather than personal advancement and intrinsic rewards are more motivating to a purposeful leader than external rewards (Yukl, 2013, p. 311). Congruity among behavior, values, and vision contributes to a sense of self-identification with the organizational goals (Bennis, 2009, p. 152). Others in the organization attribute greater charisma to such a leader and will be more open to the leader’s influence.
...leader. Certainly, it has to take into account the implications of completion from both the direct and the indirect competitors. That is why EasyJet centers on the cost management strategy and the differentiation strategy (Hanlon, 2007). Through an analysis of EasyJet Airplane company strategies and performance, it is clear that they are ambitious and strive for the best. They not only survive in an industry that is intensely competitive, as shown through the analysis by Porter's Five Forces, but also succeed in terms of offering their customers the best that they have to offer in terms of value for money. The advantage this airline gains over its oligopolistic competitors stems from flexible ticketing and complete access to all primary routes. However, in keeping airline industry, there is room for improvement and growth as the analysis using Ansoff Matrix reveals.
Faced with changing markets and higher competition, more and more firms are struggling to reestablish their dominance, keep market share, and in some cases, ensure their survival. Many have come to understand that the key to competitive success is to transform the way they function. They are reducing reliance on managerial authority, formal rules and procedures, and narrow divisions of work. In effect, companies are moving from the hierarchical and bureaucratic model of organization that has defined corporations since World War II to what can be called the task-driven organization where what has to be done governs who works with whom and who leads. But while senior managers understand the necessity of change to cope with new competitive realities, they often misunderstand what it takes to bring it about.
Leadership: A company’s philosophy is undoubtedly shaped by its leaders. Sincere leaders who lead with integrity truly inspire employees to do the same. Thus, in order for a leader to come across as genuine or “authentic,” that leader needs to lead his/her organization with purpose, meaning and personal values which are not only communicated verbally, but also communicated through the leader’s own actions. The authentic leader needs to “walk the talk.” With this value-driven leadership also comes the ability to build enduring relationships with people – first, with his/her own employees and, secondly, with his/her customers. Unfortunately, Jean-Cyril Spinetta’s (CEO, Air France) behavior in the case study is not an exemplary model of leadership. If Spinetta will not respect and respond to his best customers, then why should his employees?
Self-determination theory indicates that the three psychosocial needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness improve the quality of motivation. Individuals seek tasks that indirectly satisfy one or more of these needs. In this assignment, you will examine the levels of motivation within the self-determination theory and the factors that need to be present within a performance environment to promote a self-determined state.
The first factor is level 5 leadership. A leader is the soul of the company. Base on the research, every good-to-great company had level 5 leaders during the pivotal transition years. In the book, level 5 leaders embody a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional will (Collins, 2001, p.13). Darwin E. Smith is an example of lever 5 leasers. Smith transforms Kimberly-Clark into the leading paper-based consumer products company in the world within twenty years. Generated cumulative stocks return 4.1 times the general market, furthermore beating its direct rivals Procter & Gamble and Scott Paper. Level 5 leaderships’ ambition i...
Individuals who have high levels of autonomy might pursue goals or activities in which they must complete them individually and control their own environment. These goals and activities can range from individual sports like running track and gymnastics to professional careers that involve major work done by oneself, such as careers in health and medicine. Persons who are employed in medical careers, like nursing, must display autonomous behavior because it provides motivation for them to make decisions without requiring permission from somebody (Senturan et al., 2012). On the other hand, those who display low levels of autonomous behavior will often become submissive towards others and may show signs of obedience when it comes to decision making and protecting their personal independence. These people may be coerced into...
Self-determination theory is one that assumes all humans are born with an innate drive to better oneself, basically becoming self-actualized, which is referred to as full-functioning. In self-determination theory, or SDT, full-functioning is characterized as “being aware and mindful, acting autonomously…, and pursuing and attaining intrinsic life goals” (Deci, Ryan, and, Guay 2013). SDT describes three autonomous behaviors: intrinsically motivated, extrinsically motivated, and emotionally motivated. SDT also describes three psychological basic needs of every human: the needs for competency, autonomy, and relatedness. The need for competency causes people to try tasks slightly tougher than they can currently manage, in order to improve upon
To become a truly effective leader, one must encapsulate the various behaviors related to the aforementioned course learnings in his/her persona and demonstrate such behaviors daily. This course has allowed me to identify four behaviors that all leaders must portray to be effective. The first of which is that a leader must be inspirational. To do so, a leader must set the appropriate vision and direction for the organization and provide a path to achieving defined goals. Additionally, a leader must induce the proper levels of motivation so that each employee has sufficient incentive to work towards the organization’s goals. As discussed in the class, motivation can be accomplished by factors such as rewarding hard work and providing the correct opportunities to employees. While these are motivating in that employees desire to be fairly compensated and to be doing work they deem valuable, inspiration comes more from organizational culture. A leader will be inspirational by setting a tone that appreciates each employee’s contribution, no matter how small in scale it is. Further, employees are inspired when they work collaboratively in a group setting and can capitalize on individual strengths to drive organizational goals.
The objective of this research is to help a company or an entrepreneur understand the business environment better as well as customers’ needs and, therefore, make better business decisions.
Motivation and Leadership are intrinsically linked in the fact that one allows an easement in the process of the other. Without the ability to use the mutual relationship of leadership to influence the motivators of followers, leaders stagnate and are limited by their own inability to accomplish all that must be for real change to occur. In less Rostonian terms (that is, based on Rost (1993)), without a motivated group of followers leaders are stranded and not achieving to a level of excellence. This paper will discuss some areas of importance for motivation in leadership as well as an application to leadership theory and a discussion on personal motivators.
Within this essay a clear understanding and summarization of how contemporary and modern businesses, stating the essential knowledge needed to evolve and adapt in order to thrive (Canton, 2006). The main issues being covered will be marketing in the modern context, production in a global environment, human resources, operations, e-commerce and how a business will need to work together in order to create a more suitable world.
Leaders are those who have a great influence on the lives of many people. This is especially relevant in today’s organizations, which face extreme time changes and an increasingly growing complexity (Yukl, 1998).
Managerial decisions are an important component in achieving the objectives of the organization. The success or failure of a business depend upon the decisions made by managers (Jurina, 2011). Today’s increasing complexity in the world of business brought forth greater challenges for both the firm and its managers. The rapid rate of technological and digital advance as well as greater focus product innovation and processes that influence marketing and sales techniques have contributed to the increasing complexity in the business environment.