Through out the world today health care is a major issue in just about every country. Britain and France are no exception to this rule. Since a very long time ago there have been long standing battles between the people and governments as to how far the governments must go to provide adequate health care for its people. For the upper and middle classes health care usually comes with no problem but for the lower classes they are forced to depend on government assistance.
In France health policy making takes place largely at the national level. These actions revolve completely around two agencies called the social security and the finance. I found that international health care can be very different but at the same time very similar to the United States and in the following paragraphs you will see why.
French citizens have had comprehensive health coverage for many years, and France can be looked upon as an example of an active system. The French healthcare system is based on free enterprise and the freedom for patients to choose their own doctors. Securité sociale, the compulsory health insurance plan in France, finances or reimburses the health care of almost all French citizens. Taxes are deducted from workers' paychecks and, after medical visits or pharmaceutical purchases, the government reimburses recipients anywhere from 60 to 100 percent of their medical expenses. Complementary coverage is also available for an extra charge. Most doctors (about 99 percent) sign an agreement with securité sociale setting the rates of their services, but some doctors may charge higher fees. #
Health care is accessible and affordable for French citizens, but is more costly for the government. As in the United States, the social security system faces a constantly increasing deficit, resulting in a quest for new ways to fund medical care. Currently, French health care policy is looking for a reform mechanism that will create a more affordable system without losing the ideals of free enterprise, freedom of patient choice and a quality system accessible to all French citizens.
Pharmacies in France are specialized facilities which work closely with clients, ensuring safe products and providing professional advice. Pharmaceutic...
... middle of paper ...
...split over the question of collaboration with the private sector. Although 58% of respondents thought there should be "a fair amount" or "a great deal" of collaboration between the public and private sectors, 36% did not look upon such a relationship favourably.
When asked where the money should come from to fund the NHS, 83% of respondents said the funds should come "almost entirely" from tax revenue.
In Conclusion, the health care systems in both countries have their strong points as well as their weaknesses but I would still much rather have our own health care system. I hope these facts about the different systems will help you better understand them.
Bibliography
Cowell, Alan (2001, September 1) Health Care Gap Has British Looking Abroad The New York Times
Klein, Rudolf. 1995 The New Politics of the National Health Service, 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
Wilsford, David. 1991 Doctors and the State: The Politics of Health Care in France and the United States. Durham: Duke University Press.
An analysis of the US and Canada’s systems reveals advantages and drawbacks within each structure. While it is apparent that both countries could benefit from the adoption of portions of the others system, Canada’s healthcare system offers several benefits over the US system.
Wekesser, Carol. Health Care in America: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego, CA. Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1994.
Health care in France and The United States: Learning from each other. Paul V. Dutton, Associate Professor of European History, Northern Arizona University Research Fellow, HHS Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
... of Health Care Systems, 2014: Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. (2015). Retrieved June 04, 2016, from http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2015/jan/international-profiles-2014
During the study of various reforms that were proposed and denied, both the GOP and Democrats attempted to find a balance that would guarantee the success of their proposals. Years of research, growing ideologies, political views and disregard for the country's constitution sparked an array of alternatives to solve the country's healthcare spending. The expenditure of US healthcare dollars was mostly due to hospital reimbursements, which constitute to 30% (Longest & Darr, 2008). During the research for alternatives, the gr...
Niles, Nancy J. Basics of the U.S. Health Care System. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 2011. Print.
“Patients have an extraordinary degree of choice among providers” (Rodwin 1). Not only are individuals allowed to select their doctor, but also doctors are able to choose where they want to work and whether it is in the private or public sector. In this way, the French still maintain their ideas of liberalism in their healthcare, while maintaining a system that cares for each of its citizens. It also prevents the lack of choice that exists in some national healthcare systems and is a concern for countries considering a variation of one of these
Reese, Philip. Public Agenda Foundation. The Health Care Crisis: Containing Costs, Expanding Coverage. New York: McGraw, 2002.
Park, Han. Broken system: The U.S. has failed at health care. 27 Oct. 2007. 16 November
Newman, Alex. “Examining Healthcare: A Look Around the Globe at Nationalized Systems.” The New American. 15 Sep. 2008: 10. eLibrary. Web. 04 Nov. 2013.
Niles, N. J. (2011). Basics of the U.S. health care system. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
Stephen Jonas, Raymond G, Karen G, “An Introduction to the US healthcare System” 6th Edition, Page 118, 25 May 2007
In France, healthcare relies on the “preferred doctor” scheme, which “represents a soft form of gatekeeping.” Patients would generally obtain a diagnosis with their GP, and then are referred to specialists for further care. However, patients have the option to neglect their GP’s referrals and instead take advantage of “direct access to specialists or other GP’s” (Chevreul K 75).There are no networks of doctors and hospital, as is the case in the American healthcare system, although patients seek other providers would only face “lower levels of reimbursements” (Chevreul K 54). As a result of France’s universal healthcare system at the statutory level, patients are not restricted by the doctor and hospital networks, whereas American patients are coerced to choose a provider as dictated by their private insurance. As a result, “France is generally perceived as a country with an extensive patient choice,” bolstered by the fundamental principle that it is “a patient’s right to choose [a] health professional and hospital” (Chevreul K
During the course of conducting research, reality is that there is no clearly defined system, that would adequately address our nation’s requirements in implementing a universal policy. Each nation’s health system on a global scale faces a myriad of issues regardless of the health care policy being utilized. Yes, some are more favorable than others, but all, regardless of the applied policy are facing a crisis with costs and the ability to continuous financing of said programs.
Switzerland is predominately known for its great health care, rated as best in the world. This is largely due to how it is organized. Reorganization began in the 1994 with the Federal Heath Insurance Act, which came effect in 1996. The system is basically organized into 26 cantons, which are equivalent to US states. Each canton is responsible for the health care of the people in that region and insurance companies operate on a regional basis (James). The government decides on what policies will be covered, and sets prices of the cost of medial charges (McManus). In addition, with in the system there is a complex way with how access, quality and cost are organized.