Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Zachman framework strengths and weaknesses
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Zachman framework strengths and weaknesses
The Zachman framework is an enterprise architecture framework that does provide a formal and also highly structured way of viewing and also defining an enterprise or organization. This architecture framework usually have a two dimensional classification matrix of 36 cells that is usually based on the intersection of six kind of communication questions in its columns (where, what, why, when, who and how) with six rows levels of reification (Scope, technology model, business model, system model, components and working system) and actively transforming most difficult ideas into a more concrete ideas (Fishman, 2003). The matrix of this framework usually constitutes the overall set of descriptive representations which are relevant for describing something in an enterprise or organization. Therefore in real sense, Zachman framework is really a logical structure which is intended to give an overall representation of an IT enterprise. This architecture framework usually allow uses of multiple perspectives and also categorization of business artifacts. Zachman framework is therefore used by various level of management to gather and refine principles mostly from the older methods and then restructuring them into new ideas based on the business strategies and objectives (Ramadan, 2003). This framework usually incorporates independent tools and methods that are usually used by IT.
Most managers in many businesses view Zachman framework as a set of guidelines that assist their business in the management of complex and also evolving IT enterprises. Many business in industry such as construction, aviation, computers, transportation and other complex industrial products have admitted that they use Zachman framework as their fundamental str...
... middle of paper ...
...ecture is IBM. In fact Zachman framework was really invented by John Zachman in year 1980 for IBM organization although today it is open to public domain for use by other organization (Zachman, 1986). This framework usually borrows a lot form business design principles in architecture and also in manufacturing and that’s the reason why it help in viewing an enterprise and all its information systems from a different angle. Most large organizations face challenges in responding to change and this is mostly due to lack of proper internal understanding of the complex structure and also all components in different areas within the organization. But now, this is reducing because Zachman framework helps in providing a better means of classifying an organization’s architecture. ZIFA organization is the one which does represent and promote Zachman enterprise framework.
Enterprise is an internationally known car rental, with more than “7,000 neighboring and airport locations throughout North America and Europe. Enterprise is the largest car rental brand in North America, well-known for its great rates, award-winning customer service and picking up local car rental customers at no extra cost” (About). Enterprise offers great leadership opportunities to its employees and helps them become entrepreneurs. They provide over 1 million job opportunities worldwide, this private company thrives its self in customer service because they thrive on being personable by creating relationships not just transactions
Lego managers used the same approach they used for their blocks. They created a modularized and standardized architecture for their information systems, making it possible to expand at a faster rate and add capacity and functionality as it was needed (Pearlson, Saunders). They implemented...
The structural frame considers that right roles and relationship for people working in an organization to be one of the main keys to success. According to Bolman and Deal (2008), organizations are characterized by goals and objectives, well defined structure and division of labor, various forms of coordination and control, rational conduct and policies. These features help to make an organization more efficient and improve its performance. When an organization faces problems, they are resolved through analysis and restructuring.
By incorporating managers from around the organization, FrameworkS provides a process that successfully incorporates knowledge from a wide variety of sources. Managers are able to bring a variety of perspectives and experiences to deal with the problem at hand. The knowledge brought into focus is greater with these additional individuals involved.
Organizational structure is one of the three key organizational assets that could contribute to the effectiveness of operations of any organization (Zheng, Yan and Mclean 2009) It is joined together by different flows of information, decision processes, hierarchy of authority, specialization and working materials. (Enz 2009; Mintzberg 1980) Furthermore, it also determines the operating workflow, control of information, decision-making in the organization and the line authority (Mintzberg 1980). The facets of the organizational structure, the relationships that exist within it, and how the business processes (Bititci et al 2011) are controlled, determine the managerial style that should be utilized in addition to the strategies the organization could implement. Going further, a company’s organizational design and the parts that constitute it are seen as a contributing factor to superior performance, which ultimately provide an organization with competitive advantage over its competitors. (Enz 2009; Zheng, Yang, and Mclean 2009)
Two main imperatives for managers are pointed out by Venkatraman and Henderson: First, similar to business strategy, IT strategy has to consider both internal as well as external aspects. Second, both internal/external alignment as well as functional integration must be taken into account. Only one of them is not sufficient.
Contemporary management of the business. 7 ed. of the book. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. McComb, S., Schroeder, A., Kennedy, D., & Vozdolska, R. (2012).
Organizational structure is the way that an organization arranges people and jobs so that work can be performed and goals can be achieved. Good organizational design helps communications, productivity, and innovation. Many organization structures have been created based on organizational strategy, size, technology, and environment. Robbins and Judge (2011, p. 504) listed three common structures: simple, bureaucracy, and matrix. In this post the author will describe the matrix structure, and discuss its advantages and disadvantages.
The book suggests creating an “organizational architecture” which describes a framework identifying three critical aspects of a corporation.
In any organizations management would have to contend with any unavoidable changes that might take place. New machines, equipment, unstable business environment etc. can bring these changes. Successful implementation of the product therefore depends on the ability of the management to deal with the changes and resolve any emerging conflicts there from.
What's e-business? It is the transformation of every business process through using the internet and associated technologies. In this transformation, each part of the business becomes a part of an intrinsic network, which enables employees, suppliers and customers of a given enterprise to conduct their tasks. People usually try to make a point in differing e-business from e-commence, but as I see, e-commerce is a part of the e-business category, and an important one.
Working for a company where the single most paramount objective is to maintain the networks of other organizations makes it clear that management expects not only technology but cutting edge technology and cutting edge leadership to improve business. The company’s current technology is indeed meeting business needs everyday with its processes, systems, distribution of data, database management, telecommunications, and digital electronics. The Information Technology (IT) industry is one that is becoming increasingly important in the global economy and globalized world. Management in most companies expects technology to improve production, innovation, effective and efficient decision making, critical thinking, as well as its competitive advantage. The bottom line of revenues and profits are also expected to be improved with new and improved technology being infiltrated in the organization. Information technology, in general, plays a significant and specific strategic role in the management of organizations. Within the body of this paper, based on personal experience in the workplace, examples will be provided of how management at Quality Technology Services expects technology to improve business. Discussions will also be highlighted on how the company’s current technology is meeting or not meeting business needs.
Zulkhairi Md. Dahalin( 2012) claims the lack of a systematic and structured approach to analyze the user requirement independent of specific technology and IT solution can contribute to failure in implementing the user-desired business
Managerial decisions are an important component in achieving the objectives of the organization. The success or failure of a business depend upon the decisions made by managers (Jurina, 2011). Today’s increasing complexity in the world of business brought forth greater challenges for both the firm and its managers. The rapid rate of technological and digital advance as well as greater focus product innovation and processes that influence marketing and sales techniques have contributed to the increasing complexity in the business environment.
Organizational structure within an organization is a critical component of the day to day operations of a business. An organization benefits from organizational structure as a result of all it encompasses. It is used to define how tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated. Six elements should be addressed during the design of the organization’s structure: work specialization, departmentalization, chain of command, spans of control, centralization and decentralization. These components are a direct reflection of the organization’s culture, power and politics.