Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theme of life life of pi essay
Survival theme in life of pi
How richard parker contributed to pi's survival in the life of pi
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theme of life life of pi essay
The ability to alter the way we do things to make ourselves more suitable for a situation is an essential characteristic of all life on Earth. Changes made to our lives, whether they are consciously made or not, are always stimulated by some external factor. This is exemplified in the book Life of Pi by Yann Martel in which Richard Parker becomes a quintessential animal and plays a key role in the survival of Piscine “Pi” Patel. An examination of Richard Parker's behavioral changes and his interactions with the environment will reveal that he symbolizes adaptation.
For the purpose of this paper, adaptation means the process of being adapted or changing to meet one’s needs. During the later part of the text, we see Richard Parker adapt to meet
…show more content…
Living in a zoo, he is not responsible for finding food. This dulls his animalistic character significantly. When Richard Parker found himself on the lifeboat, he needed to find food as Pi was not willing to provide for him. One way he did this was by killing fish. “Richard Parker was not familiar with sharks...turned and started clawing the shark’s head with his free front paw and biting it with his jaws, while his rear legs began tearing at its stomach and back...Richard Parker’s snarling was simply terrifying” (219-220). During his encounter with a shark caught by Pi, Richard Parker is using his animalistic abilities for what may be the first time in his life. We see that he initially struggles with the sharks because he is not familiar with prey. Admittedly, Richard Parker is an amateur when it comes to living on his own. Nevertheless, his animalistic instincts kick in and he begins viciously “tearing” at the sharks. Described as “simply terrifying,” Richard Parker has now fulfilled the character of the most feared animal on Earth. In just a few lines, Richard Parker has gone from a weak hunter to a menacing predator because he has changed to meet his new requirement for food. Richard …show more content…
Viewing adaptation as the symbol of Richard Parker will allow you to ascertain why he and Pi change their lives depending on the situation. This makes for a better story because it connects the two characters’ journeys. For example, both go out of their comfort zones by becoming animalistic and savage. Failing to see Parker as adaptation will make you miss his connection with Pi and lose the meaning behind the characters changing. Additionally, if you do not see that Richard Parker symbolizes adaptation, you miss a major theme: Humans have an inherent will to survive. Understanding this theme is critical because it explains why Pi makes the choices he does. The theme also has implications for our own lives because it explains why humans change as well as animals. Understanding adaptation will allow you to see the parallels between Richard Parker and Pi in the way that they develop and will reveal a theme that may otherwise be
...uals death by drowning. This is also shown through the psychological lens and the id versus ego. If one fears to go with his gut and always follows societal expectations, he will end up in danger. One should always go with his instinct to survive. Fear leading to death is also shown through the Marxist lens and taming Richard Parker. If one has total control of a situation and is fearless, he will survive. Lastly, this concept is shown through the deconstruction lens and his transformation through a reverse hero’s journey. If one who is prim and proper gets stuck in a situation like Pi’s, he can’t be afraid to revert to old primitive practices such as hunting and gathering. If one fears to do so in such a situation, he won’t live. This is fear versus life in the Life of Pi.
Richard Parker is the character everyone will remember from Life of Pi, if only for the fact that he’s a tiger. He is terrifying, beautiful and apathetic; he’s also possibly half-eaten by sharks at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean without ever having stepped foot in a lifeboat, depending on what story the reader prefers. This poses an interesting question to the reader of the novel; if Richard Parker is only present in one of the stories, the tale with a lifeboat packed with animals, what does he represent in the story devoid of zoo animals entirely? An examination of Richard Parker’s comparison to other characters and actions will reveal that he symbolizes an animalistic side of the titular character. For the purposes of this essay, “animalistic side” means the side of Pi that behaves more like an animal than like a human, and is also willing to do whatever it takes to survive.
...ction of Richard Parker kept Pi aware, by showing Pi the reality of the current situation, assisted him with making the right decisions, committing certain actions, and is his sub-consciousness, his id that fights for survival. In Martel’s Life of Pi, Pi’s coping mechanism has been proven more useful in his projection Richard Parker rather than his beliefs in his religions, which has done nothing for Pi and was useless at that time. Humans and animals are very alike in certain aspects. When it all comes down to survival, humans and animals are almost alike. The human mind brings back the inner id from the human consciousness while in drastic situations to help them cope with it in order to survive. The human psychology has a very interesting way of creating coping mechanisms.
In Yann Martel’s novel Life of Pi, the narrator and protagonist Pi is placed in a life or death situation which tests his beliefs and morality. The novel also does a great job representing the relationship between human and animal behaviors and the socially accepted behavior created by our modern day society. In my opinion due to the drastic changes in Pi environment it molded his ways thinking and his actions in a particular way that he was not accustomed to until the end, this can be proven through Sigmond feuds theory of humans behavior.
This alternate ending plays a key role in understanding how to view the novel through Freudian lenses. Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis clarifies many troubling issues raised in the novel Life of Pi. Martel’s novel is about the journey of a young man being forced to test his limits in order to survive the unthinkable predicament of being lost at sea alongside an adult Bengal tiger. Life of Pi starts out by introducing an anonymous author on a quest to find his next big story and goes to a man by the name of Piscine Molitor Patel who supposedly has a story worth hearing. Patel begins his story talking about his childhood and the main events that shaped him such as his family’s zoo, the constant curiosity in religion he sought as a young boy and also how he got his nickname Pi.
Imagination played a large role behind the scenes in the book Life of Pi. “This was the terrible cost of Richard Parker” As the reader, this passage makes you think that Richard Parker was a burden for Pi, that there was nothing positive that came from this tremendous creature. Richard Parker was more than just an idea that Pi thought up, Richard Parker was Pi’s Conscience/himself. The first line of this passage represents imagination, since Richard Parker is Pi’s imagination it would translate to this was the terrible cost of my imagination. When Pi witnesses Richard Parker attack the cannibal he says “Something in me died then that has never come back to life” This has a more spiritual meaning than a literal meaning in the way Pi says it. This means that when he “imagines” this man being killed this shows how cruel life can be even when he looks to god for answers. The reason that Richard Parker is Pi’s imagination is because during the course of this book Richard Parker mimicked exactly what Pi did. For example the moment that they bot...
Pi realizes a part of growing up is learning to accept leadership and that nothing is easily given, especially in the Pacific Ocean. After a lifetime of vegetarianism, Pi had to finally kill flying fish for food, resulting in an emotion and mental breakdown (Martel 183). This action challenges Pi’s beliefs, yet, must be overcome. He soon realizes that...
... Yann Martel’s novel, Life of Pi, he uses symbolism to show who or what something symbolizes and how that affected Pi survival extents, like Pi living with two carnivorous animals, a hyena and a 450 pound Bengal tiger. All of these animals and objects in the novel symbolize someone or something, like the tiger symbolizes Pi, the orangutan symbolizes Pi’s mother, and the hyena symbolizes the cook. All of this affected Pi’s survival by Pi staying the water with Richard Parker in the boat, breaking his religion of Hinduism and eating any meat he could find to keep himself and Richard Parker alive, and risking his life to tame Richard Parker to get some control over the boat. Pi went to some great extents to survive his journey to cross the ocean and it was all affected by this.
In Yann Martels Life of Pi, the protagonist Pi Patel faces many challenges throughout his journey and transforms from a boy to a man, this necessary passage from youth to adult requires the loss of innocence. At a very young age Pi is taught a lesson by his father to never trust an animal, he takes this lesson with him after his whole family drowns in the pacific ocean on a sinking ship, and he is left alone on a life boat with an adult tiger.
...creates the character of Richard Parker to justify his actions that he considers to be savage. He even separates parts of the boat to use as a boundary between his idea of humanity and savagery. “It was time to impose myself and carve out my territory” (Martel 202). This part of the text implies to me that Pi is making the boundary between his humanity and his actions that he sees as savage. Richard Parker’s territory in the story is the bottom of the boat and under the tarpaulin. I see Richard Parker’s territory metaphorically as Pi’s savage side. Pi’s territory in his story is on top of the tarpaulin and on the raft, which I see metaphorically as the humane side of his personality. By making this separation, Pi is addressing the issue of what is savage and what is not within himself.
The most significant level is psychological because it is very important to a person’s emotional and physical survival. In order for someone to survive, he or she must have a positive mind with faith and determination in every action they take, Despite the fact that having high hopes with slim chances of survival is not as easy as it seems. “In its general form such a requirement insists that important relations (survival, identity, psychological connectedness)”. (Brennan 225). Trying to survive, Pi has to struggle with himself mentally: he has to go against his ethics like rectitude and religion pledge. To do that easily Pi finds his animalistic part which he called in his story as Richard Parker. May be because of his religious grounds he would have never done things like killing people eating fish or cannibalizing humans as done with just imagining himself as a Bengal tiger and he admits that “If I still had the will to live, it was thanks to Richard Parker. He kept me from thinking too much about my family and my tragic circumstances. He pushed me to go on living. I hated him for it, yet at the same time I was grateful.” (Martel, 219) This quote shows that he used this imagination to kill his loneliness boredom...
As the reader examines the novel Life of Pi by Yann Martel, the reader recognizes the similarities between the story of the animals and the factual story. The main character Piscine Molitor Patel, known as Pi, goes through many struggles once he is stuck on a lifeboat in the Pacific Ocean which are shown between both of his stories. Throughout the novel, Martel describes to the readers the relationships the Pi has between the animals in the story of animals and the real people in the factual story. In Life of Pi, Pi meets many different animals on his journey on the lifeboat that influence him in many ways, including the zebra, which represents the Taiwanese sailor; the hyena, which represents the chef; Orange Juice, the orangutan, which represents Pi’s mother; and the Royal Bengal tiger, Richard Parker, which represents Pi himself.
The saying “desperate times call for desperate measures” holds truth to an extent. In the award winning novel Life of Pi by Yann Martel, drastic measures are taken by characters in order to survive while stranded on a lifeboat in the middle of the ocean. Through his journey, main character, Pi Patel, endures many hardships and witnesses several deaths. Significantly, the death of the zebra accompanying Pi and the other animals establishes a generalization of human nature being sophisticated yet inherently vicious according to methods of survival.
Territorial dominance is the most prominent motif in this book. In the book Pi must know how to deal with Richard Parker and making a territory for him to be in. He needed to differentiate his area from Richard Parker’s and give him some space too. Animals are territorial creatures and will guard its territory with its life. They define their boundaries carefully and establish dominance over every piece of it. Since the boat is very small for the things on it, the differentiation in territory provides a peace between Pi and Richard Parker.
He managed to survive alongside Richard Parker, an adult tiger, every day that he was out at sea. He pushed through mental challenges that he never could have imagined having to deal with. He handled physical complications that no 16 year old should even have to think about. In the novel, Life of Pi, author Yann Martel portrays the idea that no matter how hard challenges in life may seem, if an individual perseveres through them, they will get through it. He displays this idea through Richard Parker, and mental and physical challenges that Pi faces.