Written Constitution Pros And Cons

A constitution allows the country to organizes, distributes, and regulates the authority of the federal government. Also, the constitution guide the country on the structure and the principles governing their relations with the citizens. Written constitutions allow the citizens to familiarize themselves with the laws that is affected. When the American Revolutionaries was over, the United States broke free from Great Britain and wanted to rebuild their nation as a solid foundation. The American citizens wanted their country to be a democratic society rather than a dictatorship. James Madison introduced to the First Congress the first 12 amendments, which ten of those became the Bill of Rights in 1789. The benefits of having a written constitution in the United States of America is that it clarifies roles to limited the authority on government officials

Article V of the Constitution can be amended. For example, a vote of two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate is required; however, followed by 38 states would need to ratify an amendment. Also, the United States Supreme has the authority to decide whether or not the new changes will not be violating the Bill of Rights. Another disadvantage of having a written constitution is that the language written can be easily taken out of context, which leads to confusion between citizens and the government. The United Kingdom is known to having an unwritten constitution, but their laws, policies, and codes are developed through common law. Researchers stated that minorities and individual citizens are less likely to be protected against legislative infringement by Parliament if the higher form of law is no longer in power. A unwritten constitution can lead citizens to not enjoy their freedom or take part in a self-governing process. Additionally, an unwritten constitution can be easily change, which leads citizens to study more of their new