Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments for trophy hunting
The ethics of eating animals essay
Arguments for trophy hunting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments for trophy hunting
When the term roadkill is used, there isn’t pretty imagery associated with it. Thoughts of mangled deer and flattened rabbits aren’t the kind of thing you want to think about on a regular, especially when it comes to food. This doesn’t mean people do not eat roadkill, but that category of people is small because the majority of the population can’t get past the meat's origins. In terms of ethics, roadkill is a perfectly fine source of meat. It was accidental food, not the intentional slaughtering of cows or pigs. Most of the smaller animals are definitely unsalvageable but the big game like deer or elk is what really matters when deciding if roadkill is a viable food source. Due to their size and how little damage the body takes upon impact
Deer have been roaming planet Earth for over three million years, and man has been consuming the meat of these animals since the beginning of human existence. When human beings were hunters and gatherers, wild animals were on the menu. Society has changed so drastically over centuries to where many people view hunting and the consumption of wild animals such as deer a wrong thing to do. Venison is a high quality meat that not many people have tried or would think to have in their daily diet. There are many facts and benefits that society can appreciate about the consuming of deer as an everyday protein in people’s diets.
“The animals are reducing the number of trees and seedlings and affecting which species will survive, forestry experts say” (NBC news). A wildlife professor estimated that deer cause at least $750 million in damage to the timber industry. This becomes a big impact on the economy. “We view it as problem of our own making,” said Laura Simon, field director of urban wildlife and sanctuaries program for the Humane Society of the United States. “We have created an ideal landscape for deer.” (NBC news). Deer are said to eat anything and everything, this is especially proven when farms have their crops
In conclusion, eating meat is still unethical, because even with these changes that the cattlemen and ranchers have done over the years, trying to improve the industry, it cannot make up for the damage done. There are animals still suffering and being tortured and more should be done to help them. These are some of the reasons I have for not eating meat; it’s my own personal choice. And I choose to be meat-free.
Therefore, in the story of Mad Max, the moral distinction than can be drawn is unjustified for numerous reasons. Peter Singer would agree with me on this matter, as he suggests in his text “The Case for Animal Liberation” that some of modern day tactics that are being used to kill animals cause tremendous amount of pain to non-human animals. These animals are being prisoned and tortured while in process of being prepared as meals for humans. Others assert there to be nothing wrong with meat consumption, mainly because they do not understand the pain the animal goes through. Yet, as stated earlier, these animals do go through cruelty and suffering.
In conclusion predator killing is acceptable and should stay legal for three main reasons: it would control species from overpopulating, it would keep them from destroying farmland and from killing farm animals, and if done legally it won’t lead to any mass killings or extinction of animals. Predator killing has happened over thousands of years and will continue to happen for thousand more, as long as the citizens of america allow it too. People need to get busy killing predators and protecting farm animals who can’t protect themselves.
Is horse slaughter really necessary? Much less humane? No. The answer is no. Horse slaughter is completely unnecessary and far from humane. Every year over 100,000 horses are brutally killed for human consumption (ASPCA). There is a bill that has been presented in the U.S. Senate called the Safeguard American Food Exports (SAFE) Act. The SAFE Act would not allow horse slaughter industries to operate in the U.S. and would ban horses from being shipped to other countries for slaughter. Horse slaughter needs to be ended because it’s inhumane and cruel, no horse deserves to go there, and there are plenty of other options to horse slaughter.
Horse slaughter is the solution to the overpopulation of horses. It is better for the horses to be slaughtered then for them to be abused or neglected. Horse slaughter provides a meat source, raises the economy and the entire body is used. If people did not ride horses they would be treated like livestock rather than pets. The slaughterhouse is the only home for horses without one.
Deer population has increased to levels that must be controlled. As the deer population grows so does the need for more habitat land to provide them food and shelter. The need for more habitat land is required for healthy deer, but there is less and less land available. Woodlands and rural farm lands, which are present habitat for deer, are disappearing as urban areas expand. More human- deer integration can be expected as housing developments and urban expansion continues to move in and take over deer habitat. Deer auto accidents are a result of an over population of deer being squeezed into less habitat, in which people have also invaded. The price of deer- auto accidents costs the people in forms of higher car insurance, taxes, and some even their lives. Hunting is one way people can help effectively control deer population and give back to the community instead of taking from it.
...e Animals and Satisfy Meat Eaters?” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21.6 (2008): 580-96. Web. 3 Apr. 2014.
What many people don 't know is that many animals and habitats are being destroyed because of the careless human race. I feel that it is crucial that humans intervene in the destruction of animals species and their habitats the same. After all, most of the destruction is that of our machines and mass production. I mean what would happen to all the species that become endangered from our mistakes such as careless environmental endeavors. Did you know that there are many things that we could do to help, but people just put them to the side because they feel that it isn 't important to reduce, reuse, and recycle? Such menial tasks literally take thirty seconds of our time to call and order a recycling bin. (www.worldofwildlife.org>xspecies)
The topic of hunting has always been filled with controversy, excitement and trepidation for the environment. Both sides have varies ideas as to what is wrong and right. I realize that many people do not understand why people have to hunt or why people do hunt. One of the questions that kept coming to mind is why so many people are against hunting when their ancestors hunted and without hunting many of them would not be alive today. This question is relevant because many people are becoming to be worried that animals are in pain when being hunted and that it is unfair for people to hunt selfless animals with modern weaponry, and with many people going against the right to own guns.
The world is made of balance. People, who are taking wild animals and trying to make them as pets are destroying the planet. They do not realize that once the species is gone, the ecosystem that it supported will become sick and die. I know it is happening over seas in Africa and South America, but never thought it would happen in the United States. The article, "Windsor man charged with smuggling 51 turtle in his sweatpants," written by Eric Andrew-Gee from The Star opened my eyes to understand the problem.
Should the torture of an innocent animal go unpunished? No, it should not; the real question is to what extent should the perpetrator be punished? The most basic definition of animal abuse is the intentional act of inflicting physical pain, suffering, or death on an animal; this includes monstrous neglect (the act of withholding food and water) that causes an animal to suffer, die, or be put in imminent danger of death. Currently, animal cruelty offenders are not punished to the extent that some believe they should be. Animal cruelty should receive mandatory jail time because the abuse towards an innocent animal is deemed inhumane and oftentimes is a precursor for violence against humans.
Every person has the ability to make their own choice of whether to eat meat or not. However, eating meat is directly tied to negative health effects, pollution leading to a depletion of ozone, and the depletion of hundreds of thousands of acres of land “wasted” on animal production when they could be used to solve the hunger crisis or lower emission levels. What humans eat is no longer a matter of choice; it has become a matter of life and death. Literally, the future of the whole planet rests on the decision of whether or not to eat meat. If humans chose to eat less meat the world that wouldn’t have to suffer the consequences (outlined above.) Vegetarianism is one possibility, as is Veganism; however the world would be
Numerous people believe that a vegetarian diet is unhealthy for the reason that one is not consuming enough protein since there is a decrease in the consumption of meat. However, meat is not the only source of protein. Nuts and grains contain great amounts of protein, and by eating these in the place of meat, one not only gets protein, but avoids the harmful carbohydrates and fats that are in animal meats. Consuming supplements can also help gain nutrients if the diet is not providing enough. There are countless amounts of nutritional supplements that one can purchase, including fish oil and omega 3s. These can be fairly cheap if purchased at the right place, and easily give bodies the nutrients they crave to function.