If I were to direct Woyzeck, and could arrange the scenes in any particular order I would start with Act One Scene 14. In this scene little girls ask Marie to sing with them but she declines. Then the Grandmother tells a story; "Once upon a time there was a poor child with no father and no mother, everything was dead (105)." The classic phrase "Once upon time" serves as nice introduction to the piece, and begins the play from a point of innocence. Having said that there is also an inherent darkness present in the Grandmother's story. The lonely child mirrors Woyzeck and his fight for existence in a lifeless world. Following this scene, I would go to Act Four Scene One: Woyzeck tells Andres about a vision. Woyzeck says that a "fire's raging around the sky, and a noise is coming like trumpets( 94)." This vision clues the audience into the uneasiness that is present in Woyeck's inner thoughts. Additionally this scene establishes the importance of the Woyzeck and his psyche at the beginning of the play. There is a sense of danger and mystery present in the scene which provides a build for the rest of the scenes to jump off of ( in other words this scene serves as inciting incident). Next, I would have Act Four Scene 8 where Woyzeck describes his vision to the doctor. The doctor ends up ridiculing Woyzeck for peeing in the street, questioning his vision, and asking him if he has been eating his daily dose of peas. This scene would logically come next because it acts as twisted diagnosis of Woyzeck. This scene exemplifies the hostile relationship that exists between the doctor and Woyzeck, and eludes to the theme of dehumanization present throughout the play. After this scene, I would put in Act Four Scene Two and Three. In Act Four Sc...
... middle of paper ...
...t draft). This section reaches the climax of the whole show where Woyzeck ends up stabbing Marie. It's important that scene come towards the end of the play. Not only for logical purposes, but by this point the audience has witnessed Woyzeck's journey and there understanding for what driven Woyzeck to this point of insanity. The denouncement occurs with Act Three Scene One and Two. The professor reaffirms Woyzeck pitfall existence, but continues to advice Woyzeck to eat his peas. Finally, Woyzeck ends up dying in pond. Woyzeck dies due the conditions he was placed in; this story brings the idea of natures power to the forefront and how it can shape a person. Woyzeck was a person who had very little control, and he often philosophized as an attempt to understand his own existence. This story brings in the idea of dehumanization and how it can murder the human spirit.
...ns a victim of the disease of corruption that sweep Denmark, and thus must die in accordance with the play's finale. That every main character that had grappled with corruption most fall to it.
To conclude, the author portrays Blanche’s deteriorating mental state throughout the play and by the end it has disappeared, she is in such a mental state that doctors take her away. Even at this stage she is still completely un-aware of her surroundings and the state she is in herself.
The encounter with the gravedigger is clearly a turning point for Hamlet in which he realizes the two truths that are the theme of the play: death is inevitable; death is universal. By thus dramatizing the theme and placing a statement of it on the protagonist's lips, Shakespeare conveys this message to the audience. The statement of Hamlet's theme by its main character is borne out in his subsequent speech and actions, bringing about the restoration of order that is the conclusion of a Shakespearean tragedy.
The scene that introduces the audience to Matthew Harrison Brady, in Inherit the Wind, (Dir. Stanley Kramer. With Spencer Tracy, Frederic March, and Gene Kelly. MGM. 1960) uses dialogue, composition, camera work and music to develop Matthew Brady. Kramer reveals important information about the plot of the film in this scene. The scene opens with a bird's eye view shot of the town of Hillsboro, and focuses in on the movement of the parade below. The camera comes to rest on the convertible that transports Brady and his wife. The town of Hillsboro welcomes the well-known politician. He will serve the town by being the prosecutor in a trial about evolution, similar to that of the historical Scopes Trial. This scene, where we first meet Brady, reveals his strong character, and the role of savior that the town expects him to play. Through the development of Brady, Kramer also introduces us to the issues of religion and politics. Stanley Kramer, the director, introduces the audience to two key ideas in the very first shot of the scene. He does this through the use of background tools, like music and scenery. As the camera fades in from the previous scene, music begins to play, and a group of women sing a religious hymn, "Give me that old time religion." The extremely loud music continues for the duration of the parade. At first the audience doesn't know the source of the music, but as the parade comes to an end, the camera focuses on a group of militant looking women, who march and sing. This song draws the audience into the impending controversy over religion. It expresses the entire town's point of view on the issue. The audience can see that religion affects the soc...
In Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s world, however, things couldn’t get much worse with the main figures, knowing that the end of them is programmed in the title of the play. As adaptation, ‘Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead’ happens to be locked in the end set in the initial play. This causes a deep pessimism sense in the play that cries over the absence of change and action, based on the knowledge of the audience that the only change possible will happen to cause the protagonists death.
Throughout my high school career, I’ve never worked with anything that has made me think so much. Sure, you can watch the play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead at face value, have a few laughs until it stops being funny, and then go on with your life. But you aren’t getting out of it all that Tom Stoppard intended. This play is so much more than just an accompanying work to Hamlet. It fleshes out the characters of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern in a way that makes you consider your own life! And if you really want to take anything from this play, you need to understand the messages it contains. This is a challenge to some, because of how deeply they contrast with the play at face value. But, if you can look deeper, you will a couple things about life. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead by Tom Stoppard contains the three messages of life being chaotic, taking charge of your destiny, and knowing your identity.
Polonius death is some what a butterfly affect. Once Hamlet kills Polonius is when the whole play shifts and Hamlet truly does seem mad. After Polonius death Ophelia goes mad herself expect she’s is not acting but is truly mad. Her madness eventually leads to her death by suicide in the river. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are sent by the king to England with Hamlet to have Hamlet killed because he has killed Polonius. While sleeping Hamlets changes the letters so that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern hand England their own death warrants. Hamlet then returns to Denmark to find out about Ophelia’s death and to see that Laertes is back home and knows the truth of his fathers murder and wants to duel with Hamlet.. Laertes and the king have plans to poison the tip of his sword so that with any single cut Hamlet would be dead. Laertes cannot cut him during the dual So the king tries to offer Hamlet a drink of poisoned wine but Hamlet refuses. Laertes finally gets frustrated and walks up and just cuts Hamlet but just before this Gertrude accidently drinks from the wine glass meant for Hamlet and hints to Hamlet that the king did it. Hamlet with rage runs a sword into the kings chest and forces him to drink the same wine that killed his mother. Moments later Hamlet himself falls over and passes
... as it unfolds. It is saddening to see these characters fail again and again to understand each other, and themselves. Within our own lives however, we are not so different from the characters of the play. Many things are beyond our comprehension, and it is easy for suffering to arise when people are without understanding. Alas, Shakespeare has given us fair warning of the tragedy that could spring from incomprehension. It would be unwise to take this warning for granted; perhaps a pursuit of greater understanding will correlate with less tragedy among our lives.
In conclusion, at the start of both novella and play, the authors, Shakespeare and Stevenson present to their protagonists are honourable men of high respect. However, the audience and readers gain a sense of evil lurking beneath their layers. As the play and novella develops, it is clear that the evil core starts to manifest itself. Macbeth is ashamed from his change on the contrary, Jekyll is fond of his. During the course of their paths destructive, malicious and deadly acts are executed. They both started a journey to benefit their lives however, ironically leads to their death. A journey where they falsely believed they would prosper and achieve; unfortunately reaching them sorrow, pain and anguish.
Throughout the story Chopin uses many ironic instances and symbols to illustrate the meaning of several major aspects of the story, we learn a lot more of the main character Mrs. Mallard and we come to an understanding that she did not recognize a world outside of herself.
Claudius, the wise man, is not so wise anymore. His short amount of time being King, 9 people died, including King Hamlet, Hamlet, Queen Gertrude, Laertes, Ophelia, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, Polonius, and Claudius, him self, all because of his selfish ways. First he wanted to become King, and have a gorgeous wife, because he was envious of his brother. He wanted it all, but no one gets it that easy. As soon as anyone got in his way of his brilliant plan, he wanted to destroy them. Claudius did everything in his power to save his ass. Although poison was a metaphor in this play it is also clear that poison was literally being used as well. Unfortunately for Claudius though, saving his own ass killed everyone around him, including the ones he loved, therefore left him with nothing and now he is the one who is truly dead.
The Shakespearean play of Hamlet captures the audience with many suspenseful and devastating themes including betrayal. Some of the most loved characters get betrayed by who they thought loved them most. The things these characters do to the people they love are wrong, hurtful and disappointing. These examples lead to the destruction of many characters physically and emotionally. The characters in the play who committed the act of betrayal end up paying for what they have done in the form of death, either from nature, their selfishness, disloyalty and madness. The act of betrayal truly captures and displays the play of Hamlet as a sad tragedy.
Many messages are revealed throughout Tom Stoppard’s play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead including the use of language, the question of identity, and the uncertainties of life or death. The use of language throughout the play is remarkable and basic words have many different meanings or representations. Also, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, or Guildenstern and Rosencrantz are always getting confused showing that no one knows who they are and it makes them question their identity. Lastly, both life and death both hold many uncertainties and we can never be sure of anything. We don’t know if the life we are living is real or if it is just a dream and we don’t know what happens after death. Yet, these are just a few messages from a play that contains thousands of metaphors.
The preeminence of woe has the potential to devour the vivacity of oneself. This faring of one’s internal afflictions is embedded in Shakespeare’s illustrious tragedy of Hamlet, most notably through the ceaseless complexity of the protagonist. Through his timeless mastery over the intricacy of detail, Shakespeare propels Hamlet, inconsolably stricken with the matter of demise, through interminable depression thereby initiating his fabricated, subsequently candid, lunacy ultimately contributing to his utter ignorance and culmination of life in order to reveal the calamity bestowed in the excessive contemplation of decease.
In Act III, Scene I, he says, “To die, to sleep.—ay, there’s the rub, for in that sleep of death what dreams may come when we have shuffled off his mortal coil, must give us pause.” This theme undoubtedly shines through Hamlet’s soliloquys. This theme is also apparent in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. The “game of question” evokes deep thought in the reader. Questions such as “Is there a God? “ (43), “Is there a choice?” (43), and “Who do you think you are?” (44), are posed. As the rules demand that only questions are uttered, none of the questions posed are truly answered. This game provides the spectators with a new viewpoint to the existing theme of uncertainty and meaninglessness. Rosencrantz’s and Guildenstern’s deaths are not incorporated in either of the plays, thus leaving the audience to question what had truly occured. The meaninglessness in their deaths reveal the lack of control they have over their own fate is more evident in Stoppard’s play. They recognize the lack of answers in their lives and are constantly questioning their surroundings. In the final scene, Rosencrantz expresses frustration that no explanation is provided about their lives, nor their deaths. Upon realization that Guidenstern’s life is as meaningless as his death, he attempts to kill the Player. As he runs a sword through the Player, he shouts “If there are no explanations for us, then let there be none for him” (Stoppard 96). Even the certainty of death is meaningless and Stoppard’s play aids in the exemplification of this theme though the in-depth depictions pf Rosencrantz and