Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Worldcom case study answers
Worldcom case study answers
Worldcom case study answers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Worldcom case study answers
WorldCom & Bernie Ebbers Case Study Keith Tewell University of the People The notorious saga surrounding WorldCom and the actions of its CEO, Bernie Ebbers, could be described as poor decision-making, greed, denial, deception or all of the above. In the final analysis, the driving factor behind the deviant behavior that lead the company to ruin was the business strategy of WorldCom's CEO, Bernie Ebbers (DiStafano, 2005). As CEO, Ebbers avoided internal company conflict at all costs, and he ultimately avoided the reality that WorldCom, once the dominant company in the telecommunications industry, was in serious economic trouble (Principles of Management, 2015). Ebbers autocratic style of management and top down approach …show more content…
Employees who played along were rewarded; others were threatened. Company employees who tried to bring initial problems to Ebert’s attention were discouraged, and Ebbers made it clear he only wanted to hear good news (“Principle of Management,” 2015). For example, WorldCom’s accounting department, headed by CFO, Scott Sullivan, knowingly underreported line costs and inflated revenues with bogus accounting entries. Sullivan later testified that Ebbers had repeatedly put pressure on him to meet Wall Street expectation, even as the firm's finances were crumbling (Teather, 2005). Ultimately, corporate deviance is the result of how a corporation is lead, how employees are motivated, the nature of the work, and the degree of individual …show more content…
& Brown, M. 2005). As CEO of WorldCom, Bernie Ebbers had the skills and opportunity to guide the company successfully with ethical leadership. From a social learning perspective, Ebbers’ key mangers would have observed and modeled his positive ethical behavior if he demonstrated it. In turn, subordinates of the managers would do the same. WorldCom could have survived. But Bernie Ebbers’ relentless and insatiable quest for financial growth got in the way of exercising sound ethical principles and standards. His charismatic influence and destructive deviant behavior is what eventually lead to the collapse WorldCom. Admired leaders who are seen as trustworthy, and who treat employees fairly and considerately, will develop social exchange relationships that result in employees reciprocating in positive ways (Trevino, L. & Brown, M. 2005). The corporate culture at WorldCom created by Bernie Ebbers was one of fear, intimidation and deceit. Unfortunately, because of his deviant corporate philosophy - positive reciprocation like this was not a part of
When it comes to the audit objectives, the public and the auditing profession maintain varying expectations. The public expects the prevention of fraud to be the auditor’s responsibility. However, the auditors believe that they are responsible for fraud detection, but not obliged to find all of it. In addition, the public views the fraud by the characteristics displayed by management and employees. For example, WoolEx Mills’ management wanted to exude a prevailing financial position and to uphold reputations. By committing financial statement fraud, it made the company look successful even though Sales and cash flows were decreasing. The public would view these particular characteristics as pressures to why the company committed fraud. Greed, recognition, and influences also impacted the public’s view of Wool Ex Mills’ fraud scheme. The CEO used authority to influence employees to take part in the fraud scheme. The public would see that the CEO utilized power to manipulate shareholders, which impacted their trust with WoolEx Mills (Cohen, Ding, Lesage, & Stolowy 2015) (Krishnan & Shah
Leaders who treat their employees with fairness, honesty, and provide frequent, accurate information are seen as more effective. According to Robbins and Judge (2014), “trust is a primary attribute associated with leadership and followers who trust a leader are confident their rights and interest will not be abused” (p.193). The old General Motor Corporation had eleven different CEO’s from 1923 until 2009 each with their own unique leadership style, which directed employees toward the organization goals. Unfortunately, many of the top level managers under the CEO’s had the tendency of filtering out information that did not match up with their pre-conceived notions about a particular issue and they lacked upward communication. One consumer goal of General Motors was to build trust in the company so people would be repeat customers, but building trust between employees and establishing an ethical culture was not a top priority of the organization. Goal directed leadership alone is important, but differs from a structure of leadership based on ethics. It is important to note, that effective leadership may not be the same as leadership founded on ethical principles. Business competence must exist, along with personal leadership accountability in ethical decisions. Within the General Motors organization, ethics and leadership did not interconnect; there were misalignment between the
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
Enron was the model for rapid growth in the 1990’s but part of the culture and ethics of Enron was disturbing. Falsified documents, cutthroat competitiveness among employees and accounting schemes that hid the truth of the company’s indebtedness were just a few examples of the lack of business ethics within the organization. Perhaps a more virtuous management team could have saved Enron from collapse.
the social world of Enron. The fact that they took the form they did and to such a pronounced degree are certainly troubling and perhaps surprising. What should not be surprising is the role such ritualization processes played in the development of this type of deviance, given recognition of their importance in social relationships and organizations.
Rather than being sticklers for following GAAP accounting principles and internal controls, this company took unethical behavior to a whole new level. They lied when the truth would have been easier to tell. It is almost as if they had no comprehension that the meaning of the word ethics is “the principles of conduct governing an individual or a group (professional ethics); the discipline dealing with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation”, (Mirriam-Webster, 2011). To be ethical all one has to do is follow laws, rules, regulations and your own internal moral compass, all things this company seemed to know nothing about.
In modern day business, there can be so many pressures that can cause managers to commit fraud, even though it often starts as just a little bit at first, but will spiral out of control with time. In the case of WorldCom, there were several pressures that led executives and managers to “cook the books.” Much of WorldCom’s initial growth and success was due to acquisitions. Over time, WorldCom discovered that there were no more opportunities for growth through acquisitions when the U.S. Department of Justice disallowed the acquisition of Sprint.
WorldCom began as a small provider of long distance telephone service. During the 1990s, the firm made a series of acquisitions of other telecommunications firms that boosted its reported revenues from $154 million in 1990 to $39.2 billion in 2001 (Lyke and Jickling, 2002).
This shows how a lack of transparency in reporting of financial statements leads to the destruction of a company. This all happened under the watchful eye of an auditor, Arthur Andersen. After this scandal, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was changed to keep into account the role of the auditors and how they can help in preventing such
They were committing fraud by creative accounting, acting illegally when using insider trading and shredding their documents relevant to the investigation. Next, consider the stakeholders. Anyone who owns stock in the company would suffer, along with every employee. Under the values bullet we can assume that they have none. Greed and power got the better of every one of them.
The Tyco accounting scandal is an ideal illustration of how individuals who hold key positions in an organization are able to manipulate accounting practices and financial reports for personal gain. The few key individuals involved in the Tyco Scandal (CEO Kozlowski and CFO Swartz), used a number of clever and unique tactics in order to accomplish what they did; including spring loading, manipulating their ‘key-employee loan’ program, and multiple ‘hush money’ payouts.
Richard Breeden focused heavily on the role governance played in the downfall of WorldCom and his report details several central objectives that he hoped to achieve with his proposal. His initial objective was to change the way the executives were compensated to better protect the shareholders’ interest. He tries to accomplish this by limiting equity share, capping CEO compensation, and limiting severance pay. The fraud that WorldCom engaged in could be traced to the executives, but was ultimately the result of improper board governance. Because of this, Breeden wanted to redesign the board and how it was structured, along with major changes to the Auditing, Governance, and Compensation committees.
Moreover, the auditors had looked out the attitude or rationalisation of the company to justify the fraudulent action. The top management may behalf on their own interest but not the behalf of shareholders to maintain or raise the stock price of the company. In Cendant case, the CUC’s management allegedly inflated earnings by recording increasing revenue and reducing expense to meet expectation.
In many circumstances, employees’ behaviors are likely to follow their leader. Enron’s leadership has been extremely influential due to exemplified charismatic. For example, Heffrey Skilling and Kenneth Lay, CFO and one of executive member in Enron, greatly encourage employees to follow their lead. Their incompetence accounting profession directly affects lover level of employees. Eventually, those manipulating accounting activities affect company collapse. Once leadership has done unethical professional accounting behaviors, unethical acts become accepted. Employees have many reasons for remaining quiet. While Enron still have ethical internal rules, when leadership in Enron did not abide and did not provide corresponding example of employees to follow (Prentice 2003, p. 417). Which eventually make Enron’s become one of the largest corporate scandal frauds.
Dowd (2016) runs above and beyond with the clarification to state accounting fraud incorporates the change of accounting records in regards to sales, incomes, costs and different components for a profit motive, for example, boosting organization stock prices, getting ideal financing or maintaining a strategic distance from obligation commitments. Dowd is of the feeling that covetousness, absence of straightforwardness, poor administration data and poor accounting interior controls are a couple of explanations behind accounting fraud. (Dowd,