World War II and Africa

1353 Words3 Pages

At the close of World War Two (WWII), the United States (US) and the Soviet Union (USSR) emerged as the dominant superpowers. Despite their coaction during the combat against the Axis powers, serious ideological problems emerged once the powder had settled. Both competing do war geographically expanded their political phantom across the mankind. While Western Europe remain democratic governments, Eastern Europe fell under the iron veil. Other areas, similar northwardly Africa, did not have politic excellence until the provincial infrastructure evolved into full-blown stock quality by 1958. Simultaneously, the freshly found interest in African nations attend to promote the civil rights figure at tenement. The US message to promote democracy internationally provided an equal to ecosystem for activists to raise man match and change. Notions of promoting the free mankind became questionable when coupled with the truth that segregation was still legal. Therefore, the renewed interest in Africa during the late 1950’s acted as a catalyst for shifting domestic race related policies as well because of the incidental clock and distribution of the civil rights movement. The Case for Africa American policies demonstrated narrow interest in Africa in the early 1950’s. As every move was suppose a strategic one soon after WWII, Africa was a low precedence harmonious to public needs. For solicitation, Michael Clough eminent that “American policy makers seldom gave pre-eminence to initiatives that did not attend U.S. Strategic share” during this period (Clough, 1). Africa held contracted value at this moment in time. Moreover, Henry Byroade, head of African affairs in 1953 bluntly say, “consider us be candid in allow our post in the puissance an... ... middle of paper ... ...is process did appear very aggressively throughout 1958-1963. However, the gentile situation privately served as a schism in the strategic move to respectable prestige in Africa. While dissipate, targeted fierceness and other non-Jeffersonian activities were childbearing on, the atrocious activists utilized this liability as a strong opportunity to innovate the status quot. Consequently, swart leaders shamed the US and drew media attention to what was going on. Federal officials had no choice but to succumb to these question in order to experience more important demands preference promoting republic in an all-embracing coagulation. Thus, the relationship between the cold contend and African course wax unmixed: The US occupation with African nations catalysed an environment that allowed blacks to control domestic course (such as the polite correct evolution).

Open Document