Workfare: A Critical Examination

2840 Words6 Pages

Introduction
This essay will examine the technique of workfare as a way of governing the poor. Workfare is a widely contested area which evokes many conflicting opinions at both the political and the public level. The following quote comes from Dan Hodges, a British commentator writing for The Daily Telegraph, and gives an interesting insight in one of the discussions workfare poses. Hodges writes about the way several proponents of workfare (including David Cameron, the British PM in 2012), who are quite successful themselves with their careers, condemn unemployed citizens to do anything but pleasant jobs without getting a reasonable compensation:

‘What rule says workfare must be the same old hardy staples: stack a shelf, clean a floor? If we want to really open people's eyes to the opportunities of work, why rely on Tesco and Sainsbury? We should be co-opting the Apples and the Microsofts, the BAs and the Virgins, the Jaguars and the BMWs. And instead of boycotting firms that provide the placements, we should be making business participation mandatory. David Cameron says the opponents of workfare are "snobs". Fine. Then it's time we saw someone on a workfare placement getting into the back of his Land Rover and carrying a couple of those red boxes for him. Similarly, if Sir Stuart Rose is really concerned about the "lack of backbone" from firms pulling out of the scheme, he can set an example by appointing another personal assistant for a couple of months’ (Hodges, 2012).

This essay will cover an analysis of arguments from both proponents and opponents of workfare. In addition, there will be looked at the emphasis supporters of workfare place on the notion of ‘work ethic’. First, the concept of ‘workfare’ will be unpacked. ...

... middle of paper ...

...w, 9, 1, 19-43.

Handler, J. (2004). Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Western Europe: The Paradox of Inclusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodges, D. (2012, March 1). ‘The attacks on workfare just don't stack up; The scheme should be mandatory - for our top companies as well as the unemployed. The Daily Telegraph, page 22.

Mead, L. (1993). The Logic of Workfare: the Underclass and Work Policy. In W. Wilson (Ed.) The Ghetto Underclass. 173-186, London: Sage.

Peck, J. (2001). Workfare states. New York: The Guilford Press.
Wacquant, L. (2009). The Prison as Surrogate Ghetto. In L. Wacquant (2009) Punishing the Poor: the Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.

Wacquant, L. (2010). Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare, and Social Insecurity. In Sociological Forum, 25, 2, 197-220.

Open Document