Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Roles of women in past societies
Roles of women in past societies
Marriage in ancient cultures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Roles of women in past societies
Women in the Medieval Times had harsher roles and responsibilities than women of the Anglo-Saxon times. During Medieval time women weren't genuinely seen as “important” or “significant” which is actually untrue. At both of these times in history women were the heart of everything. They were the pieces that the puzzle needed to be complete. Some may not of noticed it or think that, but women still are very important in everyday life.
In Medieval times women had a harsh life! Women spent their entire lives being dictated and run to serve their fathers and soon husbands. Women grew up learning from their mothers that you shall always put your husband's first, your husband is always right and that you are to do as they say. The main role for women during Medieval time was childbearing and taking care of the household. It is said by countless historians that several customs of the Medieval time came from the Roman Catholic Church. "Women in Medieval Society - The British Library." N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Oct. 2016.
…show more content…
Numerous women didn't have the favorable fortune of growing up in a wealthy family and having money.
The women's worth was determined by what type of family they were born into. Many were peasants and had to marry around age fourteen and not to someone they truly loved. They had to do strenuous work such as take care of the house, the animals and sometimes if they were unlucky even the yard to help their husbands. Sometimes peasant women weren’t fortunate to marry they had to be servants. When they weren't married, they had to work hard, laborious jobs such as farming or being a paid for really low wages. ("Medieval Women - History Learning Site." History Learning Site. N.p., 2016. Web. 11 Oct. 2016.
) On the other hand, if they were fortunate to be born into a wealthy family, they were luckier. Wealthier women were well-respected, unlike peasant women. Even though they couldn't pick out their husbands, they were able to tell their parents who interested them. Wealthier women were supposed to take care of the house and their kids, while their husbands take care of the land and animals.Wealthier women were well-respected, unlike peasant women. Even though they couldn't pick out their husbands, they were able to tell their parents who interested them. After they got married the noble women were able to worry solely on their family, social ranks and their children. The wealthier women were also able to play games and hunt with their husbands. While peasant women or lower class women usually had to help carry on whatever their family's business was or usually did whatever it was their husband asked. Such as merchants, farmers or even servants. If these peasant women were lucky to marry they would still be obligated to to do their share of work with for their family. Even when they had kids it was a struggle. During this time period medicine and childbearing wasn’t as safe and advanced as today's. Many women either died during childbirth or were able to give birth and then died soon later. It’s said that around 20% of women had passed due to giving birth and not having the proper medication and hospitalization. Around Anglo-Saxon time period men were seen as the Warriors and Head of Households. Women were very overlooked and disregarded. Women undoubtedly had a lot to do when you sit and look back, they were one of the main people to keep towns and families together. They had specific roles such as being the peacekeeper, cupbearers, and the memory keepers. Yes, women weren’t respected, but women of the Anglo-Saxon time didn’t have to serve their husbands, or have to get married at a young age. They were respected more, had more freedom and lenient responsibilities. It's clear to see that during Anglo-Saxon 410-660 women had more freedom than the restraints on women of the Medieval Time 476-1500. Women were never truly acknowledged or even respected as much as they should of been. Although women of the Anglo-Saxon time were somewhat seen as important or had big roles, women of the medieval times had it bad. Women were seen as just typical or standard, but women were the opposite. Without women the men wouldn't be as noble as they are today. They couldn't do what women had to do, or deal with what they had to deal with. Moral of the story women in the Medieval times had it bad!
Medieval England was considered to be a Patriarchy, due to the serious gender roles which cast men as superior to women. Margery Kempe attempted time and time again to break the boundaries of the gender roles put in place by society. The men in her life tried to stop her, and bring her back to the social norms of what it meant to be a women living in the time period: John Kempe, her priest, Christ etc. To analyze Kempe, it is first important to note what was expected of medieval women; “the classical females are portrayed as vessels of chastity, purity, and goodness” (O’Pry-Reynolds, 37). She was not your typical female; she wanted to break free from the strict expectations of women; “Men and women of the medieval period and medieval literature
The role of women in learning and education underwent a gradual change in the Afro-Eurasian world and the Americas between the 11th and 15th centuries. As societies in Africa, Middle East, India, China, Europe, and America grew more complex they created new rights and new restrictions for women. In all regions of the world but the Middle East, society allowed women to maintain education in order to support themselves and their occupations. Women slaves in the Middle East were, however, prized on their intelligence. In Africa, women were trained in culinary arts. In India, women learned how to read and write with the exception of the sacred verses of the Vedas.
Were the Witch-Hunts in Pre-modern Europe Misogynistic? The “YES” article by, Anne Llewellyn Barstow, “On Studying Witchcraft as Woman’s History” and the “NO” article by, Robin Briggs, “Women as Victims? Witches, Judges and the Community,” will be compared, and summarized.
Popular culture depicts Medieval chivalry as a glamorous and high time for women, with knights bending their knees in worship to them in Pre-Raphaelite paintings, and the fairness and virtue of women being celebrated in literature. Chivalry is often understood as the elevation of the lady fair, with men taking upon themselves the task of protecting and defending women. In fact, though, this was not an elevation of women but a limitation of their freedom and an undermining even of their intelligence and strength of will. Medieval chivalry, in essence, subordinated women to men while claiming to elevate women. In Lanval and Laustic, women are shown to have a subordinate status to men in three ways: being painted as temptresses, being subject to protection from men, and being subservient to orders from men.
The roles Anglo-Saxon women played in their society depended on the status they had in their community. As in most cultures, the roles of women in Anglo-Saxon society included mother, wife, caregiver, and teacher. Because Anglo-Saxon women had many different roles, I will only focus here on marriage, divorce, and their daily life in their society.
What if women never established rights? The world would not be the place it is today if that was the case. Women are able to do just as much as men are and even more. What if men were treated the same way as women were one thousand years ago? They would have felt just as the women did, hurt because the treatment between men and women was unfair. The fact that men and women were not treated equally was wrong in many ways, but that was the way of life during those times. In the British culture, from the Anglo-Saxon to the Renaissance time period, the men were respected on a higher level than women, and women were to always be subservient to men, which were demonstrated throughout many works of literature.
Medieval society was completely dominated by men, making a women’s life at the time difficult. Medieval law at the time stated that women could not marry without their parents consent, could not divorce their husbands, could not own property unless widows, could not inherit land if they had surviving brothers, and could own no business with special permission (Trueman, “Medieval Women”). When a woman married a man, he would get any property she owned and she would forfeit any rights she had to him. When the husband dies she would get one third of the land to live on and support herself. Unmarried women who owned land had the same rights as men (Hull). Whenever a woman got into trouble it would be her closest male relative who would appear in court, not the woman herself (Medieval).
The roles of women was an issue in medieval times and in The Canterbury Tales. In A Knight 's Tale, the women were portrayed as objects. To men they didn 't mean much. Women for them were there to help only when needed and didn 't hold an important role in society. Women were treated differently and had not much of importance.
Many of people today feel trapped inside their homes, just how the women of Pre-Industrial Europe felt. Working day in and day out inside the homes, just to keep the family together, and make a little money on the side, these women were an integral part of Pre-Industrial families. Not only were the women important to Pre-Industrial European families, but so were the households. Much of the money was made in the households, and this is where families either succeeded or failed. The household and women of Pre-Industrial Europe played an integral role in the economy of the families, and more importantly, the women of these households kept them running smoothly. Without either of these important aspects of life in Pre-Industrial Europe, it is safe to say that the families would have collapsed, due to a lack of organization and structures. Pre-Industrial Europe, in which the women and the household were “the factories” per se, due to the income they generated, was much different from the Europe we know today. Leading into the Industrialization of Europe beginning in the late 1700's and lasting through the early 1800's, the household played an integral role in the family’s income. Without the household, the families would literally collapse, due to a lack of organization and stability. Within these important family sub-units, there was one married couple, their children, the family’s servants, and in some cases, depending upon the region of Europe, there were grandparents, aunts and uncles. Not only did the father and servants of the house work, but also the women and children. Also, in the case of there being more than one generation of family in a single household, depending upon the region of Europe, the grandparents, aunts, and uncles would also work within the house. Once the children of these households reached a certain age, usually the early teens, they were sent off to work in a house as a servant. These servants were different then the servants of today, as they worked for room, board, and food, not waiting on the family. Once they started to generate income, the teens would save up the money necessary to begin their own family. However, there were the few exceptions; teens that did not work as servants, and ended up marrying into an existing household. This however,...
The Crucible shows that women had no say so in how their life and marriage went. Their husbands spoke for them. The only task women had to worry about was reproducing, praying, and understanding their place in the family. Farming was usually run by the farmer and his wife. The woman usually fed the chickens, collected the eggs, or did the milking. Being a midwife was also very important to the community. It was usually run by two women, who helped with childbirth. Spinning wool and flax into thread was a very important task due to the limitation of fabrics during this time. Children usually helped their mothers tend to the farm, or became servants in homes at a very young age. Working as a servant was done by young girls, until she and her prospective husband had saved enough money to start a business, and or get married.
Throughout the years, rights between both genders has changed and provided women more equally rights similar to men. It took women hundreds of years to gain the same or similar equality as men, and even now there is still inequality in the workplace. Men originally treated women like objects and extremely poorly. It is known that during the Renaissance time period, society was a patriarchal society, in which men were the primary authority. Women were forced to live by rules and standards that were unfair and unreasonable in both the household and in the workplace. Women should have had the same rights as men instead of being treated as a minority and known as incapable for being independent because they did extreme amounts of work that were unrecognized.
Society at this time was dominated by men, making women live extremely challenging and limited lives. The position and status of a woman ultimately depended on that of her husband. She was not given many rights unless it was allowed by her husband. Women had to withstand arranged marriages and there were times they encountered abuse from their spouse. What many people do not see in this society is that women longed for their own empowerment and they wanted to be given the opportunity to create their own success in life without being overshadowed by their husbands. Women were supposed to be seen and not heard. They did not carry a voice in this society. This was a way of life for women "the relations of the sexes were restructured to one of
Understanding the way women both were controllers of and controlled by social, political and cultural forces in the medieval period is a complex matter. This is due to a number of factors- the lack of documentation of medieval women, high numbers of illiteracy amongst women, especially lower class, medieval sources being viewed through a contemporary lens and the actual limitations and expectations placed upon women during the period, to name a few. The primary sources: The Treasure of The City of Ladies by Catherine of Siena and Peter of Blois’ letter to Eleanor of Aquitaine concerning her rebellion, highlight the restrictions women were expected to adhere to, and the subsequent reprimanding that occurred when they didn’t. Women were not passive victims to the blatant patriarchal standards that existed within medieval society, even though ultimately they would be vilified for rebelling.
Women had a very difficult position in society during the Middle Ages. The feudal age was known for its superstitions, and women were often convicted of witchcraft and burned at the stake. Some of the more lucky women held professions of there own, such as blacksmiths, carpenters, and apothecaries....
During the times in which Shakespeare lived, women had certain roles which ensured they were a permanent underclass to men. In Women in Shakespeare’s world by Theresa D. Kemp, Kemp states that “The roles of early modern women included daughters and wives, sisters and mothers; they learned and worked and played but for the most part they were not expected to be school girls (whining or otherwise) As women they were expected to be the slightly beautiful beloved and not the balladeer. Women were not seen as fit to play soldier or the judge. And as keepers of the homes and the households, as in our own time, women withdrawn from a “world too wide” ( 29). This quote from Kemp shows how victorian women were seen a just a pretty face to do as told. They were to be obedient and non opinionated. A woman of that time period was very objectified and used, basically women weren't real people.