Summary Of Women's Right To The Suffrage By Susan B Anthony

1312 Words3 Pages

Women had been discriminated for almost one hundred years during the year of 1873. Susan B. Anthony, a women’s rights activist voted in the 1872 presidential election, and for this was arrested. A year later, she gave a speech, “Women's Rights to the Suffrage,” that changed not only history, but women’s rights ever since. In, “Women's Rights to the Suffrage,” Susan B. Anthony persuades her audience that women have the right to be involved with the government according to multiple credible sources. She argues that if the constitution is correct, both genders have made this nation what it is, so, we aren’t following our own rules. Then she adds; because we are doing this incorrectly, this democracy is actually a dictatorship since the government …show more content…

In continuation Anthony adds; even though women are considered citizens according to Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier, we haven’t recognized them, but discriminated them. This speech by Susan B. Anthony is most compelling because she used ethos, logos, pathos, and other rhetorical devices to reach out to the audience’s hearts and minds. Anthony convinces us throughout the speech that women already have the same rights as men. Her biggest main idea explains that both genders built this nation, therefore we need to respect the men and the women, and their unalienable rights of which we haven’t ensured. “The preamble of the Federal Constitution says:,” Anthony’s idea of connecting her argument with the Constitution: the backbone of our country, made this point unforgettable and relatable. This allusion made people think, could this be true, why do people disagree with her? Doing this gave her both credibility (ethos) and attention of hearts (pathos). …show more content…

Anthony’s main arguments comes up in the middle of the speech. It claims that this government we call a democracy is actually an oligarchy made of rich, educated, white men, and all males ‘rule’ over females and the less wealthy. So, Anthony claims our government has become a dictatorship due to how and who runs this country. This statement impacted the central idea because it almost summed up the entire point of her speech. By all means she was arrested for voting as a woman, so this charge justifies her feelings about her experience. Giving these titles out was a big opposition due to the way she delivered her idea. Her long sentences showed she had a lot to say, and supported her opinion with a great deal of confidence. “To them this government has no just powers derived from the consent of the governed.” In this sentence, Anthony uses her vocabulary to broaden the meaning of a word or phrase, giving her logos. Derived means, that came from, and consent translates to permission. So, to rephrase, she said; for women, this government has no fair powers that came from the permission of the citizens. By broadening this statement, she got ethos, which gave her respect for her thoughts. This credibility she attained through this claim made a difference because the audience could have contradicted with Anthony, doing nothing for her cause. She used repetition in her speech as well, “to them this government...to them this government is not a democracy. It

Open Document