Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chinese and western culture
Chinese and western culture
Chinese and western culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Marble Portrait Bust of a Woman with a Scroll in early Byzantine Empire and Figure of a Seated Court Lady in Tang Dynasty of China are two female statues presenting at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Although they come from different cultures and time periods, use different materials and manufacture techniques, they share some of the similarities. The most obvious, the intentions of their artists seem the same – to reflect the status of women in the society at their time.
Both realistic and nonspecific figures, and were made in the golden age of arts, politics and economics, these two statues represent the highest level of craft making of each period. Marble Portrait Bust of a Woman with a Scroll (Bust below) was created in Constantinople, late 4th-early 5th century, the first golden age of Byzantine Empire. It was only a few decades after Constantine the great constructing his new capital splitting from the Eastern Roman Empire, the society and the culture was pushed up into a new stage, especially in religion. Eastern Orthodox, as a main faction of the Christianity and the main religion of the empire, influenced massively in every aspect of the society, especially in the arts of architectures, sculptures and paintings. But against the major trend that almost all the female sculptures are religious (Virgin) or deities, the Bust depicts a secular figure – which is suggested in the description that “Perhaps as the funerary monument of a leading member of the imperial aristocracy.”
As same as the bust, Figure of a Seated Court Lady (Court Lady below) also came from a heyday of arts and religion. It was created in 8th century, the Kai Yuan prosperous period of Tang Dynasty. The major trend for the form of art at that time was Bud...
... middle of paper ...
...s of Kasaya in Buddhism. 可能还加点
Other than these similarities, there are also some of the differences. The biggest contrast is the texture. As an early example of Byzantine’s sculptures, Bust was influenced by Roman culture referred to its texture – marble, and was derived from the features in Hellenistic style. The creamy white polished surface is the most typical material that used in engraving art in Europe. Switch to the Chinese sculpture, the texture of Court Lady is earthenware with three-colors glaze, in which the Chinese refers to “Sancai”, representative the most popular and highest-level form of art in Tang Dynasty.
Works Cited
http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/468716 http://www.jstor.org/stable/3269176 http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/66.25
http://www.ollisandoostermeijer.com/chinese_antiquities/tang_dynasty_028.html
These two statues are famous to the Egyptian art era. They represent the woman’s position and the man’s position at that day and age. Traditionally, the rulers of Egypt were male. So, when Hatshepsut, Dynasty 18, ca. 1473-1458 B.C., assumed the titles and functions of king she was portrayed in royal male costumes. Such representations were more for a political statement, rather than a reflection of the way she actually looked. In this sculpture, she sits upon a throne and wears the royal kilt and the striped nemes (NEM-iss) headdress with the uraeus (cobra) and is bare chested like a man. However, she does not wear the royal beard, and the proportions of her body are delicate and feminine.
In this paper I am exploring “Portrait of Augustus as general” and “Khafre enthroned”. From exploring and getting to know the Statues in my Art History Book I have compared these statues (Kleiner, 2013). The first and most obvious similarity between the two is in the artists’ idealization and immortalization of their subjects. Both Khafre and Augustus are portrayed in an idealized manner, designed to give the impression of nobility, timelessness, and divinity. The two statues were the political advertisements of their times that showed the public images of reliable leaders who one
The difference between an archaic statue such as Kroisos (fig. 5-11) and a classical statue such as Doryphoros (fig. 5-42) may not seem very great in a single glance. In fact, you may not notice any differences in that one glance. Yet, if you were to look at them closely, you can see that these two statues actually have very little in common.
Both sculptures represent Mary holding the dead body of Jesus. According to our textbook, “This figure group represented a challenge for sculptors, because the body of the adult Christ had to be positioned across his mother’s lap,” (139). Both of the sculptures were created through carving. This is a “subtractive process in which a block of material is cut away to reveal the desired form,” (Carving).
The Statue of a kouros and the Portrait statue of a boy both depict similar subjects, however are greatly different in how they accomplish this task. Through detail, or lack there of, the Greeks and Romans are able to display a certain value they have in its members. These two statues were made about 500 years apart and approach the sculpting process quit differently. The Greek statue seems to use geometric exaggerated lines to form the body while the Romans use a more realistic approach and sculpt the body with a more rounded finish. Statue of a kouros, from about 590 B.C and Portrait of a boy, from about the first century, do not share any great technical aspects and are basically nothing alike.
"Statuette of a standing maiden [Etruscan] (17.190.2066) | Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History | The Metropolitan Museum of Art." The Metropolitan Museum of Art - Home. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Feb. 2014.
In regards to subject matter, both pieces of sculpture are of leaders, Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II were the pharaoh and queen of Egypt around 2500 BCE., and Caesar Augustus was the Emperor of Rome from September 23, 63 BCE to August 19, 14 CE., shown in this work as a general from Primaport, Italy.
I learned about many significant artwork and artist in this class. This class provided me with a better understanding of the history of the world Art, but also helped me understand the development of art style. However, among all of these precious pieces of artwork, there are two special ones that caught my attention: The Chinese Qin Terracotta Warriors and The Haniwa. Each of them represents the artist’s stylistic characteristics and cultural context. Although they represented different art of rulers, historical values, and scenes, there were visible similarities.
Pablo Picasso is certainly a genius who has left an indelible mark on his time. Consequently, many artists all over the world have had their own career influenced by his work. Among those artists can be listed Willem de Kooning, a Dutch American painter, and the Cameroonian artist Koko Komegne. For instance, both artists have had their early work, and later their career impacted by Picasso’s cubism. While de Kooning spent hours looking at each detail of Picasso’s paintings, Koko Komegne learnt to paint by reproducing the master’s artworks. Another thing both artists shared with Picasso through their career was the woman as subject matter. Unsurprisingly, de Kooning and Komegne have extensively painted the woman in their own career. Among all those pieces, Seated Woman, 1940, from Willem de Kooning and Toilette, 2006, from Koko Komegne are very similar; the characters on both pieces are ladies, and they have the same pose. However, although the two paintings are similar in term of descriptive subject matter, de Kooning and Komegne draw from their environment and their personal style to highlight their specificities.
Egyptian art is infamous across the world - classified by the monumental pyramids, and the Sphinx. Although these are both valid forms of Egyptian art, they do not make up the entire artistic history of the country. On the contrary, perhaps the most replicated example of classic Egyptian art, from the Old Kingdom, can be found in their rendering of the human form. An interest in portraiture developed early in Egypt. (Gardner, 75) Whether painted on pottery, or cut into rock, the figures all had notably Egyptian characteristics. "The seated statue is one of only a very small number of basic formulaic types employed by the sculptors of the Old Kingdom." (Gardner, 75)
The Byzantine mosaic was an early Christian predecessor whereby it clear cuts the religious tales drawn from the bible. There was a combination of forces between the political and religious authority which gave the emperor power over the architecture and art of Byzantine Empire. The Roman Empire was collapsing due to the interruption by German tribes hence they were not able to teach manners and morals according to the artistic and cultural ways of the mosaics hence they were unable to determine art of the early Christianity while the art of Byzantine
Both of these pieces of art have much in common. Their functions are almost identical. Both were used to mark burial sites and to honor the deceased buried there. The body language of both the pieces’ figures are similar, with one seated and several others standing around them. Neither has color, but unlike the grave stele, the funerary banquet does show some degree of emotion. The figures in the banquet scene have slight smiles. These pieces played an important role in their times, honoring those who had passed on to the afterlife. For both of these people, it was important to memorialize them very similar to our practices today.
The first vessel I chose, named “Zhui” gui, is from West Zhou dynasty, which was probably cast around 900 to 850 B.C.E. Basically, this vessels consists of two distinct parts -- an oblate bowl with two handles symmetrically by the side and a huge square base at the bottom. Starting from the bowl, it’s decorated organized but not delicately. The ornaments can be mainly divided into three parts. The top and bottom patterns are almost the same, looking like a band with plenty of coiling-type clouds, which each two of them reverses both upside down and mirror-symmetrically, except for a raised head of an antelope-like animal lying in the middle of the upper band, having its long horns curling inward. The middle part is more complex. One can easily identify two raised prominent eyes of a taotie, a motif commonly found on Chinese ritual bronze, symmetrically lie on each side of the central...
Byzantine art had many basic characteristics. The first was expressionistic using color and emotion. Many of the are lacked depth in a two dimensional fashion. The art was symbolic in nature, decorative, detailed. The figures are stiff and ...
Looking at these four images alone, I can seem many similarities between the Maitreya 1 and Gupta sculptures and the Gandharan and Maitreya 2. The Maitreya 1 and Gupta sculptures are both broze, they both have similar poses, similar clothing and even similar drapery styles. These two are definitely not archaic styles but I also would call them hellenistic nor classical styles. They are like a hybrid of the three styles, because you can see the drapery but it doesn’t look realistic, it just looks lines added to the toga to make it look like it’s drapery. But like in hellenistic and classical sculptures you can see where the body is, especially on the Gupta statue. As for the Maitreya 2 and Gandharan statues I can see a more hellenistic/classical