Women Should Not Be Allowed In The Military

686 Words2 Pages

Women in Combat Roles Should women risk their lives and join the army? A combat is a fight or a battle which takes place in war between two military forces. Around the world there are certain criteria for admission to the military, such as physical fitness and age, but the majority of the countries add gender to it. Some countries allow women to join the combat while other countries did not accept women in military. Recently, women participation in combat has become a controversial issue between people. Some people believe that women are weaker than men emotionally so, it is difficult for them to join the combat, while others claim that there must be equality between men and women so, women should be given the same opportunity. In reality, women should not be allowed to have a combat roles in military in their home country because women are physically weak and they have domestic duties. …show more content…

It is widely known that, men are physically stronger than women and it is proven medically that physical weakness is due to the hormonal differences. Testosterone is a hormone which is responsible for muscle strength and mass. The main function of it is to promote muscle development and increase muscle protein synthesis. Originally, men have elevated levels of testosterone than women; that is why women are less muscular than men. Consequently, women cannot join the combat because they are weak so, they cannot defend themselves. Furthermore, women pass through difficult stages in their lives which makes them weak such as pregnancy and menstrual period. As a result of all these, the weakness of women do not allow them to join the

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Megan H. Mackenzie's Essay 'Let Women Fight'

    986 Words  | 2 Pages

    The military is trying to find new ways to recognize the fact that women now fight in the country’s wars. In 2011 the Military Leadership Diversity Commission recommended that the Department of Defense remove all combat restrictions on women. Although many jobs have been opened for women in the military, there is still 7.3 percent of jobs that are closed to them. On February 9, 2012, George Little announced that the Department of Defense would continue to reduce the restrictions that were put on women’s roles. The argument that “women are not physically fit for combat” is the most common and well-researched justification for their exclusion from fighting units. It has been proven if women go through proper training and necessary adaptations, they can complete the same physical tasks as any man. Though there seem to be many reasons from the exclusion of women in the military, the main ones have appeared to be that they do not have the strength to go through combat, would be a distraction to the men, and that they would interrupt male bonding and group

    Read More

  • Rebecca Zissou Women Warriors Analysis

    628 Words  | 2 Pages

    Women should be allowed in combat roles in the armed forces because they are just as capable as men. To begin, women such as Shaye Haver and Kristen Griest, graduates of the Fort Benning Ranger School, have shown that they can meet the same physical requirements as men. Nevertheless, these women still weren’t allowed to serve in combat positions despite the rigorous training they completed that involved grueling obstacles they had to complete all while carrying 100-pound gear. Does that make any sense to you? It didn’t to me and it certainly didn’t to women like Sgt. Patricia A. Bradford who said “If you have to be able to lift a certain amount of weight in order to do a certain job, then the weight is not going to know whether you’re male or female.” (Women at Arms: On the Ground.). In fact, in some instances women have proved to be even more

    Read More

  • Women and the Draft

    813 Words  | 2 Pages

    With society’s past and present it is apparent that women are still not equal even if they have the title. Men are observably stronger and have a different mentality in situations than women. This is not to say that women should not be in the military but they should have the choice that way they can accept the responsibility and train themselves mentally and physically to achieve the responsibility and respect needed to fight for our country.

    Read More

  • Women in the Military: The Combat Exclusion Law

    1366 Words  | 3 Pages

    Should women serve in combat positions? The Combat Exclusion Law has dealt with this question since the 1940’s. As time continues, the question remains. The military has increased the percentage of females allowed to be enlisted and commissioned in the services as well as increasing the positions allotted to them (Matthews, Ender, Laurence, & Rohall, 2009). Keenan posits “women have served with distinction in … the Revolutionary War…as volunteer nurses and were only occasionally in the direct line of fire…four nurses evacuating 42 patients while the Germans bombed their field hospital…” (the DoD Combat Exclusion Policy) pg. 21.

    Read More

  • Women's Roles in the Military

    1295 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before World War I, women assisted the military during wartime mainly as nurses and helpers. Some women, however, did become involved in battles. Molly Pitcher, a Revolutionary War water carrier, singlehandedly kept a cannon in action after a artillery crew had been disabled. During the

    Read More

  • Frankenstein and the Portrayal of Women by Mary Shelley

    1002 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e many reasons why they are weak. One main reason is, the story itself takes place in a patriarchal society that gives the story a setting that it is male-dominated. Women in society are still commonly stereotyped to be weak fragile creatures and when they act like a man or do an action that is quite normal when males do it, it is considered extraordinary. An example of this would be when Hillary Clinton ran for president and so many people saw Clinton as extraordinary for competing but if she was a male it would be normal. In opposite terms, when a male does something that normally women would do, for example cooking, it is seen as different and even at times looked down upon. Although women are opinionated this way societies are always changing, but even though there is no distinct society that is fully patriarchal, many cultures still show patriarchal features.

    Read More

  • Women in Combat

    1219 Words  | 3 Pages

    When it comes to combat assignments and the needs of the military, men take precedence over all other considerations, including career prospects of female service members. Female military members have been encouraged to pursue opportunities and career enhancement within the armed forces, which limit them only to the needs and good of the service due to women being not as “similarly situated” as their male counterparts when it comes to strength or aggressiveness, and are not able to handle combat situations.

    Read More

  • Women´s Responsibility in the Military: The Right to Fight

    1232 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many women around the world have big responsibilities in the military, and although some people may disagree, I believe they can handle anything a man can handle when it comes to being on the battlefield. Some people think that women should not be able to fight in the military, where as other people think they should be able to fight in the military. Each supporter and non-supporter has their own reasons. Some of the reasons for the non-supporters are because of their gender. They think that because they are women, they cannot handle the challenges that being on the battlefield brings. Women are willing to fight, and they know what can happen, they know exactly what can happen. They are willing to fight for their country, and I believe they should be able to. The men that fight for our country are against women fighting in combat. They believe that women are not capable of doing what they do to defend and fight for our country. The men feel that they cannot trust women to help back them up at war simply because of the fact that they are women.

    Read More

  • Darwin’s Evolutionary Gender Theory Flaw

    1514 Words  | 4 Pages

    “It is not probable that the greater strength of man was primarily acquired through the inherited effects of his having worked harder than woman for his own subsistence and that of his family; for the women in all barbarous nations are compelled to work at least as hard as the men” (234). Men may usually be stronger than women but it’s not necessarily always true. Women could be just as strong as men if the cultural and beauty standards were different and if it was what women desired. This idea has evolved from social factors being implemented more than evolution or biology.

    Read More

  • Women in the Military

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    The problem of women fighting in combat along with their male counterparts is not a one-sided problem. Elizabeth Hoisington has earned the rank of Brigadier General in the U.S. Army, leads the Women’s Army Corps and believes that women should not serve in combat because they are not as physically, mentally, or emotionally qualified as a male is and that ...

    Read More

  • Should girls play on boys' sports teams?

    1221 Words  | 3 Pages

    Females can be strong but they have to work at it much harder than males because males are just naturally stronger. This is because, “Men are 50 percent stronger than women in brute strength” (drjamesdobson.org). Men are stronger than women because the sex hormone testosterone, is found in high levels in men which gives them a head start in building muscle, “The sex hormone has anabolic effects, meaning it promotes muscle development. Secreted by the pituitary gland, testosterone binds to skeletal fiber cells and stimulates the growth of proteins, the building blocks of meaty muscles” [source: Roundy](science.how...

    Read More

  • Military Women Should NOT Be Allowed in Combat Positions

    1676 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men.  The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't  have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done.  Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations.   It would be a great mistake to allow  women in these stressful and dangerous situations.

    Read More

  • Women in the Military

    1465 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gender integration in the military has always faced the question of social acceptance, whether society can accept how women will be treated and respected in the military. Throughout the history of the military, our leadership has always sought ways in how to integrate without upsetting the general public if our females were captured as prisoners of war, raped, discriminated or even blown up in combat. My paper will discuss three situations pertaining to the first female submariner, fighter pilot and infantry graduate. I will also discuss some of the arguments that male military leaders and lawmakers opposed the integration of women: lack of strength, endurance, and the disruption of unit cohesion. I will end this paper with my personnel experience as a female NCO responsible for other female subordinates within my command and share some of their experiences while deployed in combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Read More

  • Should Women Serve In Combat?

    675 Words  | 2 Pages

    Across the history, women Suffer from luck of their right. Culture and civilization was not respect women and put them in the lower layer in their social pyramid. Kill them were they alive, while other give them a life with a lot of misery and obstacle, which is the same thing or killing them better than these life . At the few previous centuries, the world growth and become more opening. people understanding that they are needing women in a lot of job outside their home as men. Sadly, when we came to combat sector, we stop thinking logically. It is men major one hundred percent . If we look to the book (1001 things everyone should know about women's history) which written by Constance Jones (2000) we can find that only 88013 women among history had the ability to take part in military by give a variety of services. Some country actually these day try to make it happen. For instance the first country was allowed women in military was Norway around 1985. Then, it followed by thirteen other countries. It still small percentage compared with the world. It is the right of women to join army and take part in combat, because they are capable as men in adapting with situation. Also, they have equally amount in cerebration and they have the right to decide their own destiny.

    Read More

  • Women in the Military

    1113 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some people will argue that the physical differences between men and women are substantial enough to dismiss women from infantry. In the Army, women do not have to score as high as the men on the physical fitness test, further backing the argument about physical strength. Women, on average, have less upper-body strength, less muscle mass, and a lighter skeleton, which could lead to an increased risk of structural injury (Owens). If women were assigned to the front lines, they may not be capable of doing the physically demanding jobs such as handling Howitzer munitions (Owens). There is a feeling of a double standard because men are held to higher physical fitness requirements than women.

    Read More

More about Women Should Not Be Allowed In The Military

Open Document