Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reintroducing wolves to national parks
Wolf population controls
Protect wolves research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reintroducing wolves to national parks
Wolves According to Western Wildlife Outreach, wolves can live in many different habitats such as: forests, mountains, swamps, deserts, and tundras, their territories can vary from two hundred to five hundred square miles, but can range from as small as eighteen square miles to as large as one thousand square miles (Wolf Biology and Behavior). Thats a lot of range! They can also communicate with each other over long distances utilizing their keen sense of smell. On a good day they can detect lingering scents from a mile away, this can prevent them from unknowingly entering another packs territory. They can also communicate through facial expressions such as, baring of teeth, and pointing of ears (Wolf Biology and Behavior). It is …show more content…
Wolves have many threats to their successful existence for example: disease, natural disasters such as forest fires and floods and humans. Humans are the biggest threat to the wolf population (Wolf Biology and Behavior). We kill their food, we destroy their habitats, we see each other as threats. We have guns and they their instincts, both can be dangerous but the gun usually wins. Nowadays there are protection laws and we are not allowed to shoot wolves, unless they are attacking us, even then depending on the situation you may still receive fines.
Wolves are worshiped as spirits of nature, and are seen as animals of wisdom and guidance by Native Americans (Nina Fascione). Wolves play an important part in their culture. Not long ago wolves lived side by side with Native Americans and were an integral part of the ecosystem. Wolves use to roam nearly all of North America, there were as many as 250,000 to 500,000 wild wolves living in harmony with man (White). What changed? Have you ever heard of the Big Bad Wolf? Well this story originated from Europe where wolves often times had rabies, this and other similar stories reached the Americas shortly after it was
…show more content…
U.S. Fish and wildlife services have made a plan for wolf management, and they definitely see the population growing throughout the years to come, we may never see the numbers as high as they were in 1960 but they have made an remarkable comeback in the last few years (Wolf Biology and Behavior). Some people think they should be hunted as a sport if their numbers increase too much, because there isn't really a predator for wolves they may have to be hunted eventually but if people go overboard we could be back at the
This makes them seem less menacing and scary like the first article makes them look. Sharon Levy says in part "It is only in the two decades that biologists have started to build a clearer picture of wolf ecology….Instead of seeing rogue man-eaters and savage packs, we now understand that wolves have evolved to live in extended family groups.." (ll 19-22) This article also explains the positive overall effects of the wolves moving back to Yellowstone. Not only did the wolves have a new home filled with beautiful elk for prey they were also protected from hunters. This changed the attitude of the wolves as well as their population, of course their population grew and stayed more
Gray Wolf Optimization Gray wolf optimization is presented in the following subsections based on the work in [13]. 1) Inspiration: Grey wolves are considered as apex predators, meaning that they are at the top of the food chain. Grey wolves mostly prefer to live in a pack. The group size is 512 on average. They have a very strict social dominant hierarchy.
The human mind is very powerful, whether were trying to figure out what we don’t know, or trying to persuade others to fear the same as we do. With this fear mankind is set on a path of destruction. To conquer their fears humans often act out by violence. This violent outbreak doesn’t solve the problem but instead makes it worse. Wolves are examples of the ways humans handle their fears. Humans don’t understand the behaviors of wolves and that makes them believe that they are bad and should be feared. Mowats time researching the wolves has led him to believe that it isn’t the wolves who are the ones to blame, but the humans who were the cause of the main problem; the decrease in caribou. Mankind needs to realize that fear is a natural thing that occurs in everything, and we shouldn’t let our fears drive us to make bad decisions that we might regret later.
...I think that repopulating wolves in an area where they might have to deal with people is kind of a feeble-witted idea. Wolves are not an animal with a great reputation, even though they might not deserve that reputation most people do not like. I think that people as a whole would probably rather have deer in their back yard rather than wolves. Therefore, the questions what can happen, what should happen, and what will happen, with the deer problem all three have different answers. These answers will differ due to the area that the deer are in and the peoples' feeling towards these deer. It is too bad that there is not one perfect solution to the deer problem. Maybe in the future there will be, but until then we will have to deal with each problem that comes up individually.
Wolves had live throughout parts of the world for thousands of years before humans just kept rising in population and minimizing the wolves’ population through the expansion of their territories for farm agriculture and industrialization. It is only in the United States where humans completely annihilated wolves; they did this by hunting the wolves down until the last wolf was killed in 1926. However, in 1995, 14 wolves were caught from Canada and release into Yellowstone National Park. This makes it almost 70 years since the wolves have been reintroduced back into Yellowstone National Park (17 July 2009)
When the reintroduction of wolves began in the state of Wisconsin, a goal of 350 wolves was set, and this number was reached successfully in a short amount of time. Once this was reached, however, the population continued to rise dramatically and exponentially, and is now in the upper 600s (Allen). The problems now come down to a few simple questions that have complex answers. Will a regulated hunt get out of control, and a repeat of the past begins? Are the wolves posing any sort of threat in the present? Who or what would a hunt benefit? First, the issue of the past must be addressed. Back in the earlier years of the United States, wolves roamed free, and when farmers moved their livestock into what was then the wolves' territo...
Many hundreds of years ago wolves roamed the entire North American continent with no barriers and very few predators. As settlers moved into the United States, wolves became more and more scarce in the wild of America. As the wilderness areas of the United States declined, so did the population of the wolf, until there were only a few spots in the wild where wolves could still be found.
There have been many different models proposed to describe the processes operating on populations influenced by wolf predation. Some of the proposed mechanisms include the predation limiting hypothesis, the predation regulating hypothesis, the predator pit hypothesis, and the stable limit cycle hypothesis (Boutin 1992). The purpose of this paper is to assess the empirical data on population dynamics and attempt to determine if one of the four hypotheses is a better model of the effects of wolf predation on ungulate population densities. The predation limiting hypothesis proposes that predation is the primary factor that limits prey density. In this non- equilibrium model recurrent fluctuations occur in the prey population.
During 70 years of absence from the Rockies, the Grey Wolf had been protected under the Endangered Species Act that was passed in 1973. Since the wolf is under the protection of Endangered Species Act a person could be punished with up to a $100,000 fine and up to 1 year in jail for killing a wolf. Back in the 1850's there was a major population increase of the wolves in America, this was due to settlers moving west. These settlers killed more than 80 million bison, the wolves started to scavenge on the carcasses left behind.
...y white fur for fur that cost a lot of money. Some people like to sell their teeth for money or make jewelry. Mostly just for the thrill of it. Also to sell the whole wolf for money or cut off pieces of the wolf like head, ears, paws, and tail as a award for that they killed one. So because of all the stuff that people are doing to kill these wolves are making all them all disappear. There are less ad less. There are not in all 50 states as they use to be, they are reduced down to 7 states and Canada, that is how serious there case is now a day.
Gibson, J. William. "The New War on Wolves." Los Angeles Times. 08 Dec. 2011: A.25. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 21 Feb. 2014.
The most likely scenario for wolves beginning to coexist with humans is that a human hunting party came across a very young wolf cub and decided to take it with them. The wolf cub would have been very puppy-like at an early age. The reason that humans would ever take a wolf cub is because the cub would be seen as a valuable resource to humans back then. The wolf cub would become a sort of tool for humans since it is a better tracker, has keener senses, and is faster then humans. The hunters would have figured they and wolves were both hunters and hunted in packs. The humans would share their food with the cub and protect it from being hunted by outside animals, but they would also use the cub to keep them alive by having it track down prey for food. Also, they would probably watch to see if the cub sensed danger in the nearby area so then the hunters could avoid it, too.
He stated, “I never trust the children of the wolf, because they are wild animals. Cunning is the greatest talent for taking advantage of the sweat of other”. The children he was referencing were the descendants of Romulus and Remus; therefore, suggesting Rome being a location filled with wild people that cannot be trusted. However, Rome is not the only civilization who believes wolves are not wild fiends, but rather trustworthy companions. Native American traditionally considered them as a good sign, a protector, strong, courageous, mysterious (Lake-Thom). Native Americans have often held timber wolves in the highest esteem in their culture. In truth, they are many times seen as a sacred animal and featured significantly in ancient songs, dances and stories that have been handed down for generations. Their role in artwork and other cultural items of Native American life was a given and often revered and welcomed. In Christianity, the wolf is represented as a symbol of greed, lust, evil, destructiveness. This may be where Antonio got his perception of wolves because on page 76 of the novel he states he advises his students to read Christ stopped at
This paper will examine a policy perspective article titled “Pendulum Swings in Wolf Management Led to Conflict, Illegal Kills, and a Legislated wolf hunt” written by Erik R. Olson,Jennifer L. Stenglein, Victoria Shelley, Adena R. Rissman, Christine Browne-Nu-nez, Zachary Voyles, AdrianP.Wydeven, and Timothy Van Deelen published in the Journal of the Society of Conservation Biology in September of 2015. There will be emphasis on the thesis of the article under examination, but the main focus will be the issue of wolf management policy and its effects swinging wolf population densities. Firstly, this paper will present a detailed description of the issue of wolf management. Secondly, this paper will provide a description of the policy perspective
Wolves have already been exterminated in many places. However, there may be less danger of such excesses in the future, as wolf control is increasingly based on biology rather than emotion. There is now a greater awareness among people that the killing by wolves of deer and other prey species, which we may want for ourselves, is not a sufficient reason for the extermination of wolves. Sometimes populations of game animals are critically low, so on biological grounds wolf control could be justified; however, control programs are always opposed by ever-increasing urban populations. Proposed wolf culls have become major political issues in many areas in North America. When controls are carried out, they need to be done to meet certain criteria, which are based on sound scientific information and stewardship of wildlife populations.