Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The legend of william wallace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The legend of william wallace
William Wallace’s effect on Scotland
The British Isles during the fourteenth century was an extremely hectic and war torn place. England was controlling Scotland through brutality and force. Scotland desperately wanted their freedom from the English. Even though Scotland wanted freedom, no one had the initiative or bravery to form a resistance; Until William Wallace started to resist the English. William Wallace played an extremely important role in the development of both Scotland and England through his role as the protector of Scotland. William Wallace was a very selfless man who centered his life on the well-being of Scotland.
William Wallace’s resistance began in Lanark in the late thirteenth century (“Lanark Museum” 1). William Wallace
…show more content…
had committed some crimes and was considered to be an outlaw; for this reason law enforcement was pursuing him. In 1297 the British soldiers surrounded both William Wallace and his wife, although William Wallace managed to escape, the soldiers captured his wife. In an effort to coax William Wallace out of hiding, the British Soldiers had his wife executed (“Events” 1). After William Wallace killed the soldiers he killed the sheriff, as shown by this quote, “Wallace broke into Heselrig’s bedchamber and hacked the English sheriff to death (William Wallace 1).” This was the event that began William Wallace’s rebellion. From that moment on William Wallace was fighting for Scotland’s freedom. After William Wallace’s wife was killed and he had killed the sheriff of Lanark; William Wallace began an attack across Dumfriesshire.
“William Wallace was joined by Sir William Douglas and led his men in a devastating raid across Dumfrieshire (“Events” 1).” With Douglas’s help Wallace was able to move across the countryside killing Edward’s Supporters and capturing castles for his rebellion. While Wallace was rebelling in the south, another uprising was occurring in the North. Sir Andrew Murray was leading a successful rebellion against the English in the North. After Wallace’s attacks in the south of Scotland were done; He decided to move his forces north to attack. With both Wallace’s rebellion in the south and Murray’s rebellion in the North intensifying; England was beginning to have a larger and larger problem on their …show more content…
hands. William Wallace and Andrew Murray met in the late thirteenth century. In order to make their rebellion more effective, they decide to join their forces against the English oppressors (“Events” 2). Combined, William Wallace and Andrew Murray had taken back the majority of Scotland. Because they had been so successful in their rebellion, they now faced the entire English army. Soon Wallace and Murray’s men would be put to the test. The first major battle was The Battle of Sterling Bridge. The English had to cross Sterling Bridge in order to negotiate with the Scottish. The First time the English crossed the bridge they returned because their leader had slept in and he ordered them back until he was ready. The next time the English crossed they crossed in order to get a message from the Scottish leaders. They expected the message to be that Wallace and Murray were surrendering, so they were ordered back across the bridge. When they realized that Wallace and Murray had not surrendered they crossed the bridge a third time. This time when they crossed the Scottish attacked. Because the Scottish New how the English were going to cross the bridge they massacred the English (“Events” 2). “The Scots suffered one significant casualty, Andrew Murray, who was badly wounded and died two months later (BBC News 1).” Other than that loss the Scotts won an overwhelming victory. Because of his great victory at the battle of Sterling Bridge Wallace was named protector of Scotland.
Wallace was in charge of Scotland’s government while he was protector. Wallace launched an invasion of England and began ransacking the English countryside. The majority of Wallace’s invasion was focused on Northumberland (“William Wallace’s Invasion” 4). William Wallace continued his invasion for about a year without any opposition from England, but the English eventually had enough time to regroup and form a resistance to the Scottish invasion of England. The next major battle for William Wallace was the Battle of Falkirk. Wallace had been evading this battle for weeks because he feared the outcome of the battle. In this battle William Wallace and the Scottish had the better positions and better training. The Scottish army looked to be in better shape, but the English vastly outnumbered them. The Scottish were dug in front of a patch of woods and had very good position. They had driven stakes into the ground and were in formation behind them. But because the English force was so large the Scottish were quickly overwhelmed (“Events” 3). They fought valiantly but could not overcome the sheer numbers of the English. “Thousands of Scots died, but William Wallace was able to escape with most of his commanders (“Events” 3).” The Battle of Falkirk marked the decline of William Wallace’s
resistance. After the devastating loss at the battle of Falkirk William, Wallace resigned as protector of Scotland. John Comyn and Robert Bruce now assumed guardianship of Scotland. Even without William Wallace the resistance in Scotland continued on. The Scottish people continued to push for freedom and eventually convinced the Pope to side with them. The Pope told them that King John was coming to their aid with a French army to help the resistance. The rumor that King John was coming with a French army kept the Scottish spirit high. The rumor raised hope for them. But Robert Bruce did not want King John to come back and take the crown so in 1300 he resigned as guardian. Eventually in 1302 Robert Bruce Joined King Edward of England (“Events” 3). The Scottish Army continued to furiously resist the English. The English launched a counter invasion and the Scottish Army moved north until the English had to retreat because of winter. The next battle that occurred, the Scottish won very easily. They snuck into the English camp while they were sleeping and killed many of the English soldiers (“Events” 3). However, the Scottish luck would soon run out. With England constantly attacking and always pushing into their country, the Scots were in a very weakened state.“The Final blow actually came from France, when the king of France was forced to sign a treaty with Edward, one that did not include Scotland (“Events” 4).” When the treaty was accepted the resistance in Scotland stopped. There were very few people who still resisted England. When the treaty was accepted most Scottish leaders accepted the terms given to them by King Edward. When the French signed a treaty the Scots realized that there would be no help from King John (“Events” 4). Because of this, hope for freedom was lost. Even through all of this William Wallace still resisted the English. In the end though, William Wallace’s dream for a free Scotland would not be realized. On August 3, 1305 William Wallace was betrayed by Sir John Menteith. Menteith turned him in to the English. William Wallace was declared a traitor and was brutally tortured, as illustrated by this quote, “He was dragged four miles through London to Smithfield. There he was hanged, as a murder and thief, but cut down still alive. Then he was mutilated, disemboweled and, being accused of treason, he was probably emasculated (BBC News 2).” Even though William Wallace did not succeed in giving Scotland it’s freedom, he did make England recognize Scotland as a threat. William Wallace dramatically altered the course of both Scotland’s and England’s history when he launched his rebellion. Without his rebellion Scotland may not have become a country. Wallace played a key role in giving the Scottish people hope for their freedom. He also inspired people to be much more prideful of Scotland. He inspired an entire country to rise up against their captors, and for this William Wallace will always be remembered for.
William Wallace is considered a legend in Scotland. For years, England and Scotland were at war, and behind many of the battles for Scotland’s independence was William Wallace. While the information about him, like any good hero, might be over exaggerated by some historians, what’s true is that he gave the country hope that Scotland could be free from English Tyranny. For years after he died, others took his place in saving Scotland from English rule.
Bush, Michael. ‘Up for the Commonwealth’: the significance of tax grievances in the English rebellions of 1536, English Historical Review 106 (1991).
...e gun, it seemed, the greater the owner‘s pride in it.” (McCullough 33) The Continental army certainly did not look like an army yet these people were brought together in this fight for freedom and prevailed even winning the support of Americans who had no hope the British would be defeated.” Merchant Erving had sided with the Loyalists primarily because he thought the rebellion would fail. But the success of Washington‘s army at Boston had changed his mind as it had for many” (McCullough 108). The reader must comprehend the power of this accomplishment for the rag-tag army. “Especially for those who had been with Washington and who knew what a close call it was at the beginning-how often circumstance, storms, contrary winds, the oddities or strengths of individual character had made the difference- the outcome seemed little short of a miracle.” (McCullough 294).
In the early years of the Seven Year’s war, the British struggled, suffering a significant defeat at Fort Duquesne and surrendering at Fort Necessity. (Davidson p.102-3) Their defeats were largely due to incompetent leadership and the British’s policy decisions. For example, General Braddock alienated the Native Indians, which then aligned with and fought with the French. The North American colonial troops despised commanding officer General Campbell, the Earl of Loudon. Many men we...
To set the stage for this battle, we must first understand what the British were thinking at the time. The British had not ...
The eventual breakdown of severing relations between Charles I and Parliament gave way to a brutal and bloody English Civil War. However, the extent that Parliament was to blame for the collapse of cooperation between them and ultimately war, was arguably only to a moderate extent. This is because Parliament merely acted in defiance of King Charles I’s harsh personal rule, by implementing controlling legislation, attacking his ruthless advisors and encouraging public opinion against him. These actions however only proceeded Charles I’s personal abuse of his power, which first and foremost exacerbated public opinion against his rule. This was worsened
The history books should be re-written as to include Major-General James Wolfe as one of the founding fathers of our country. During the Seven years War he served as part of the British military and was the commander-in-chief of the British, American, and Highlander forces at the Battle of Quebec. His plan of attack up the Anse du Foulon to the Plains of Abraham was not only incredibly daring, but highly effective as it was this decisive move that allowed Wolfe’s army to capture the city of Quebec. He caught the French forces completely off guard and was therefore able to even out the numbers to almost completely even fighting forces. The question that lies ahead of me in this paper is to answer a two part question to the best of my ability with the research I have done. How was James Wolfe able to lead the English forces, which were outnumbered 4 to 1, to victory? Was this victory at the Battle of Quebec truly a victory of a madman?
Many suspect that they were with Washington only to maximize the hate on both sides of the battle. They went against Washington’s orders to not be the aggressors. Soon large units of British and American soldiers were sent to settle what should have been small battles. The French however were prepared to fight back and even had the Indians as allies to help with upcoming battles. In July, Braddock’s army which consisted of over 2000 British soldiers rode west with George Washington and came upon 250 plus French soldiers with over 600 Indians allies. Nearly 1000 British were killed, unlike George Washington who was unhurt during the battle was soon promoted to commander of the Virginia army for his bravery. (Roark 146)
The large retaliation attack mounted by the colonists ended the immediate English threat in the region. Adam does not play a major role in the outcome of the battle, however the battle plays a major role in Adam’s development.
William had a youth of clean life and of much natural piety, while the years of storm and stress through which he passed gave him an endurance of character which lasted to his life's end. During the time of anarchy in Normandy he became a skilled military leader and defeated his enemies, uniting his duchy. Once he began fighting, rumor has it that he never lost a battle. In 1047 a serious rebellion of nobles occurred, and William with the aid of King Henry of France, gained a great victory at Val-ès-Dunes, near Caen.
The Seven Years War was a big deal to the French, Indian nations, and British. William helped out the most in this conflict and had Brittain win. I can say this because on page 122, (the last paragraph) of “The American Journey” textbook, it states that “Great Britain's fortunes improved after William Pitt came to power…” This proves that William Pitt did have the techniques to defeat the French. But people might say that he made things worse, because...
The two sides come to an agreement, Britain surrenders to France, and they are lead towards the Atlantic Ocean so that the British can be returned to England, “with pride”. On the route there they are ambushed by a very large band of Indians...
William's first plan of attack was a success. A couple days before the battle started, Duke William and an army of Norman men ported on Pevensey Landing (Ibeji). Pevensey Landing was an embankment around the harbor with a castle at the top of the hill (Ibeji). As soon as the Normans set ashore, they started burning the surrounding areas only to make King Harold come down with an army of men to protect the people and fight off the Normans (Ibeji). As this strategy lessened Harold's army (Ibeji). As the next couple days passed Harold only had an army of 5,000 men, as William had an army of 15,000 archers and cavalry (Ibeji). The day of battle came as King Harold had the greater advantage fighting do...
In 1642, King Charles raised his royal standard in Nottingham, marking the beginning of the English Civil War. The next ten years saw the Cavaliers (supporters of the King) and the Roundheads (supporters of the parliament) engaged in a vicious battle for their respective leaders with the Roundheads ultimately victorious. This essay will attempt to explain why civil war broke out in England while summarizing the story behind the antagonism of the two parties.
“Have not a furnace for your foe so hot that it do singe yourself.” (Mabillard 1). The Wars of the Roses was a furnace that was boiling, it caused many changes for England from rebellions and overthrowing multiple kings and queens, to new dynasties and causing England to change for the better with ambition and thus becoming what it is today.