Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of the tragic hero
Characteristics of the tragic hero
Characteristics of the tragic hero
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
William Wallace is the epitome of a tragic hero. One key characteristic found in tragic heroes is that they all have a character trait that is the root cause of their downfall in the end. Wallace had more than one of these traits, but the one that is most prevalent is his stubbornness. One example of this would be when he was being tortured, he had multiple opportunities to show mercy and stop the torture, yet he chose to stick by his beliefs even though it caused him pain. he repeatedly put some self in situations where he knows he will be hurt, but he continues on, knowing that he is fighting for a just cause. Wallace is the cause behind to the defeat of the insurmountable evil Edward Longshanks. His refusal to call mercy will being tortured
turn to many people to his side. His death inspired many people to finish what he had started. his death brought both Scottish Nobles and commoners together to defeat the British. His strength in battle as well as in death inspired many people to rethink all of what they had been taught. because of his actions, people began to see things from the Scottish point of you, and realized her poorly they were being treated. It is because of the reasons stated above, that William Wallace is the epitome of a tragic hero.
“Consider the lobster” by David Foster Wallace and “Letters from Birmingham Jail” by MLK Jr. apply rhetoric such as pathos, logos, ethos, and diction in order to create a firm persuasive essay. In Wallace’s article the audience is questioned about the morality behind killing and cooking a lobster, while in MLK’s article we are persuaded to take action about social injustice and inequality. Both authors try to prompt their readers with different types of rhetoric, but together they apply pathos more than ethos and logos.
Stevenson discusses his journey as an attorney for the condemned on death row. He speaks of
...ad a strong character trait; he was stubborn, smart, and brave. He was a strong individual that had a complicated family issue. An issue that he was unsure if the issue could be resolved if he was back with his family, instead he left and decided it would be better to confront the issue through another approach. The approach he took to resolve the issue was time; sometimes there are problems that a person will encounter that takes time and perception, not to just jump into a situation when unsure of the true nature of the situation. We all dwell differently, some people like to talk about their problems but some people don’t. Others just like to keep their personal feeling or emotions private or maybe try to figure their emotions out on their own time at their own pace, and I believe that Cristopher McCandless was one private individual with those character traits.
The one author whose style I could appreciate most and who I could connect with best in “Doubletakes” was David Foster Wallace. His ability to capture one moment that most people would normally take for granted and to freeze this moment like it is occurring in slow motion, taking into account all five human senses (touch, sight, smell, taste and hearing), color imagery, similes, metaphors and all of his unique description of the scenes surrounding the actions of the main character really make him stand out in my mind. By taking an event so seemingly trivial (for example the act of climbing up and jumping off of a diving board in Forever Overhead), Wallace forces his readers to appreciate all aspects of life, especially the minor details. This is what appeals most to me about Wallace because I too like to point out small, seemingly insignificant events in my writing and put them under a microscope so to force the reader to think more seriously about mundane actions.
The 1960's were characterized as an era full of turmoil. During this era, one of the most controversial topics was the fight over civil rights. One of the key political figures against civil rights movement and pro-segregation was George Wallace. Wallace represented the racist southern view. Many Americans were segregationist, but Wallace was adamant about the topic. Many established political figures were assassinated, during the 1960's. Martin Luther King, JFK, and RFK were all positive visionaries caused controversy throughout that decade. George Wallace was against the modern government, pro-middle class, and against civil rights. Wallace and many other visionaries were cut down to early in life. Wallace was not killed by the assassin's bullet but his political career was changed. The attempt on Wallace's life left him a broken man in a wheelchair. People remembered the George Wallace who smoked his cigar and denounced the State Department as communist. Wallace was a feared politician who lived in a state full of beatings and problems. Racism was the norm and Wallace took full advantage of this ploy to gain political attention.
The commencement speech given by David Foster Wallace in the autumn of 2005, is a very deep speech that examines the whole idea of a Liberal Arts education at an extremely deep and intellectual level. In the 22 minute long speech Wallace talks about how higher education not only teaches you to think but “how to exercise some control over how and what you think.” (Wallace). Wallace later in his speech stresses the importance of this level of thinking by saying “if you cannot exercise this kind of choice in adult life, you will be totally hosed” (Wallace) What he means by saying this is that if you cannot think at a higher level and make sense of real world problems your life will become meaningless and you will become dead inside your head.
So great was his sway over Alabama that by the time he had been in office
This rhetorical device of ethos gives Wallace good credibility as a writer. He explains how his beliefs are not logically correct and this gives the reader a sense of credibility that Wallace is not biased. This type of rhetorical device was not used in Singer’s writing piece. I believe Singer couldn’t include this type of rhetorical device because it would have taken away the scholarly aspect of his writing. Next, Wallace asks the reader their point of view on the issue of killing lobsters. Wallace asks questions such as “Do you think much about the moral status and suffering of the animals involved?” (p.20 Wallace) and “Do you ever think idly, about the possible reasons for your reluctance to think about it?” (p.20 Wallace). These questions make the reader stop and think about their personal beliefs on the issue. Even I myself started coming up with questions whether it was morally right to kill lobsters. Furthermore, Wallace’s stylistic type of writing makes it easier for the reader to understand his point of view. I believe Wallace uses this writing style to give the reader a sense of personal connection with
5. The chemicals department must become more profitable. Until this can happen, the 2 other departments (electronics, plastics) should acquire their materials from a source that is the lowest cost to the company. If the above recommendations fail to improve the profitability of the chemicals division, it should consider changing management or even selling off this division.
Carter gives an account of Wallace's campaign style. Wallace is portrayed as a man that uses scare tactics. He doesn't have the element of policy on his side. Political campaigns can often disrupt the cohesion of its community. Carter gives reference to how Wallace used his beliefs, intertwined with what the people he represented wanted to hear. "But Wallace, more than any other political figure of the 1960s and early 1970s, sensed the frustrations-the rage-of many American voters, made commonplace a new level of political incivility and intemperate rhetoric, and focused that anger upon a convenient set of scapegoats." (Carter 6)
"It was as though in those last minutes he was summing up the lesson that this long course in human wickedness had taught us--the lesson of the fearsome, the word-and-thought-defying banality of evil" (252).
In Grand Opening by John Hassler, Wallace Flint bears the weight of misfortune, his resentment and blame become his ultimate fall.
He breeds anger in Clarence and the populace, not of himself, but of Edward and the rightful heirs. "We are not safe, Clarence, we are not safe,"3 he exclaims as his brother is hauled away to the tower. He preys on the "hateful luxury And bestial appetite"4 of the citizenry, catapulting himself to the thrown over a heap of bodies: deaths that hang on his head. But, it is Richard's attitude that his end goal of the crown justifies the murderous means that so closely links ...
had Clarence killed so that he could have an uncontested line to the throne. Shakespeare also said that Richard killed young
Marquis get what he wanted, he did many reckless acts and did not think through situations before