Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thesis statement william shakespeare about authorship
Shakespeare's influence on the audience
Shakespeare's influence on the audience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Many people have heard of the name William Shakespeare, or at least read some of his great literary works. However, there are some people who believe that the great William Shakespeare did not write everything that was acclaimed to him. This theory is the basis for the Authorship question, the question of whether or not William Shakespeare wrote all of his literature or did someone else write it under his name. The authorship question has garnered a lot of attention over the years and many a writer of the period has been believed to be the ghost writer behind Shakespeare. Even many respected authors and scholars believe that William Shakespeare did not write his own works; however, there remains a lack of evidence and a lot of guess-work in …show more content…
Some even dispute the claim that someone born into a lower class family like Shakespeare would have advanced knowledge of the royal court. David Kathman says to this [1] “…points out that nobody in Shakespeare’s day, or for centuries afterward, thought that the plays displayed an accurate knowledge of royal courts.” It seems to be clear that while there is some mystery around his authorship, a lot of the arguments for it being someone other than Shakespeare can simply be disproven, or are blatantly incorrect. Some even go as far to try and prove that he had little to do in the theater world. They state that there is very little documentation of him as a writer, except for what exists to put the name William Shakespeare as the front man for the true writer. However, a lot of this conjecture and just plain wrong, several actors and friends of Shakespeare supported him as an actor and a playwright. There are several things that tie him to the literary and theater world. There is even a legal document that claims that Shakespeare is a great poet! In a legal document wrote by William Camden, in which he argued Shakespeare’s right to bear arms, he lists in him the document as the greatest poet of his time. However, this is mostly ignored by anti-Stratfordians, who instead cite Shakespeare’s will as another piece of evidence. In Shakespeare’s will, disregarding the part that was interlined later about fellow actors buying mourning rings, he doesn’t mention theater, but instead mentions the disposal of his large estate. Many people find it weird that he failed to talk about several of his unfinished works, or anything else to do with theater. However, this is just probably due to the will being written before the unfinished poems were started, and Shakespeare wanted to focus the will on what to do with his possessions rather than what he had done in life. But the
They compared it to the said to be authors and the writing did not match their writing. This proves that Shakespeare was the writer of his plays and poems. Second, it has been proven that Shakespeare received a good education. He attended King Edward VI School, Stratford-upon-Avon (Did Shakespeare Write His Plays?).
Abstract: The debate over the legitimacy of the authorship of Shakespearean works has been disputed for centuries. While many scholars have held beliefs that Shakespeare's works have been written by figures such as Christopher Marlowe, Francis Bacon, William Stanley, and others, the most heated debate today is between William Shakespeare and Edward DeVere, the Earl of Oxford. Each side of this debate has many followers, the Stratfordians, or those who claim Shakespeare to be the true author, and the Oxfordians who believe that true credit should go to DeVere. My paper, far from being a complete analysis of the possibilities of Shakespearean authorship, attempts to summarize and rationalize the arguments of these two groups. It would be impossible to include all arguments and evidence in a paper such as this. Full books have been written on aspects of the debate I will not even mention, or may just barely touch on. Hopefully after reading this paper, however, you will have a little better understanding of the debate of authorship. As I am not in any respect a scholar on the subject I shall not attempt to make a conclusion as to which of these men is the author, but rather to inform and explain the many arguments on both sides of this debate in the hopes that the reader can learn a little more about the ongoing debate and form an opinion of his or her own.
The works of Shakespeare are some of the most respected in English literature. They have set the standard for all the great writers who followed. Although these works have been attributed to William Shakespeare of Stratford, they could have been written by anyone. The definite authorship of a work is always uncertain, but these works are particularly contested. There are those who believe someone besides Shakespeare of Stratford wrote the works, while others believe his identity, as a whole, is a conspiracy. Clearly the author of a work is important, but some wonder if knowing the author’s identity is really worth all the fuss. The works of Shakespeare will still reign at the top of English literature no matter who wrote them. Therefore, the question of authorship may not even be relevant.
There are clues that the Earl of Oxford is the real author, of the Shakespeare plays. “Their evidence for Oxford as author is as questionable as their belief is impassioned”. They discovered, for example, in a 1578 address to Oxford by fellow poet Gabriel Harvey, a tell-tale clue: Harvey says, “Thine eyes flash fire, they will shakes spears…..”[emphasis added] – an unmistakable reference to the Bard! Unfortunately, this is a rogue translation of the Latin words,...
Consequently, some conserves say that the Earl of Oxford would be more suited for making the plays that Shakespeare wrote. According to Joe Nickels “In 1987 a moot-court debate on the Oxford-Versus-Shakespeare controversy was held at the American University. It was presided by three U.S. Supreme Court Justices… Stevens pointedly concluded the ‘the Oxdordian case suffers from not having a single, coherent theory of the case’ (qtd. In Bethell 1991, 47)” (Nickells sec 4). This means that the Supreme Court Justices did not support the theory of the Oxdordian, and would not support the theory that the Earl of Oxford could make Shakespeare’s plays. This helps to understand why the Earl of Oxford could not have made Shakespeare’s outstanding play. With all the evidence that is presented there would be no doubt that only Shakespeare could write the plays. In addition to Joe Nickells, Alexa Stevenson quotes “The most popular answer of the anti-Stratford theories are that the plays attributed to Shakespeare were written by the Earl of Oxford … Oxford died in 1604, and significant evidence indicates that some of Shakespeare’s work was produced years later” (Stevenson para 5). This explains why Earl of Oxford could not write Shakespeare’s plays, because he was dead when more were written. This shows conserves that Oxfo...
Scholar Diana Price in her article, "Shakespeare's Authorship and Questions of Evidence" takes an independent, serious and thought provoking role in investigating the answer to a question of over 400 years: Was Shakespeare of Stratford really responsible for writing all those stories and sonnets?
When education is concerned, no one truly knew whether or not Shakespeare wrote his plays. According to the article “The Education of William Shakespeare”, “William Shakespeare would have attended King Edwards VI Grammar school in Stratford-Upon-Avon.” ("The Education Of William Shakespeare” sec. 1). On the contrary, an article written by Dutch Steven states, “Shakespeare was not educated enough and Stratford- Upon-Avon was too backward of a place to have produced a play write of such caliber.” (Dutch, Steven para. 1). Needless to say, the true education of William Shakespeare cannot be determined because the evidence proving his schooling contradicts itself. If the true records of Shakespeare’s education were found, would it prove he wrote the plays? Why are the records of his education scrambled and inconclusive? This leads readers to believe different stories that may or may not be valid. Therefore, there is not solid evidence that Shakespeare had a strong enough education to author such elaborate plays. To conclude, there is not solid evidence that Shakespeare authored the plays.
There is evidence to deny that William Shakespeare authored his plays. Research has most likely shown that the Earl of Oxford was more knowledgeable about writing Shakespeare’s plays. According to Paul Hechinger, “There are websites and even whole societies devoted to the proposition that the Earl of Oxford wrote Shakespeare’s plays”(para.4). Paul Hechinger believes that the Earl of Oxford had more knowledge from the evidence he researched to make it more realistic than Shakespeare writing the plays. There are no records indicating that William Shakespeare ever went to school, making the Earl of Oxford more believable to have written the plays.
“William Shakespeare (26 April 1564 – 23 April 1616) was and English poet and playwright, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world’s preeminent dramatist” (vodppl.upm.edu 2). He was born in Stratford-Upon-Avon, UK, he also passed away in his hometown. “When Shakespeare died in 1616 the event was barely noticed” (Epstein 7). “Shakespeare’s family was initially prosperous but began having financial difficulties in the 1570’s” (Allen 325). “Shakespeare gained his education by attending the local grammar school, King’s New School, where the curriculum stressed a classic education of Greek mythology and roman comedy”(shakespeareinamericancomunites.org 1). He never carried his educational career to a higher level as in a university. “William Shakespeare was not recognized as an actor, poet, and playwright until 1592” (Allen 346).
One of the largest mysteries of current time is the debate over who the author of the plays commonly attributed to William Shakespeare really is. Commonly termed as the “authorship problem,” many skeptics believe that the William Shaksper of Stratford (the spelling of his name originally) could not have been the true composer of the plays he is traditionally attributed with. Although the thought of someone besides Shakespeare composing the plays is not popular with the American and European world, there are excessive theories concerning the truth behind the possibility of the works being authentically his.
His career bridged the reigns of Elizabeth I (ruled 1558-1603) and James I (ruled 1603-1625); he was a favorite of both monarchs. Indeed, King James paid Shakespeare's theater company the greatest possible compliment by endowing them with the status of king's players. Wealthy and renowned, Shakespeare retired to Stratford, and died in 1616 at the age of fifty-two. At the time of Shakespeare's death, such luminaries as Ben Jonson hailed him as the apogee of Renaissance theater. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Shakespeare's works were collected and printed in various editions in the century following his death, and by the early eighteenth century his reputation as the greatest poet ever to write in English was well established.
Shakespeare’s plays and sonnets are big contributors to today's literature, but we still don't know the truth about who actually wrote them. There is many conspiracy theories that suggest William Shakespeare didn't actually write his plays, some believe William Stanley, Christopher Marlowe, or Edward de Vere may have have just used William Shakespeare as a pen name. Each theory has good points but they also all have parts that are not possible and don't make sense. What theory is true may never be answered due to the fact that the events happened so many years ago and there isn't much documentation from shakespeare's time.
Queen Elizabeth had such a great impact on the performing arts and what they are today. She had been fond of many different poets and play writers, although she seemed to take to William Shakespeare the most. He was born just 6 years after she had ascended the throne so by the time they were able to meet performing arts was at it’s peak. This helps us to assume why Shakespeare was so fond of the arts being that we do not have much documented about his life. Shakespeare is one of the most mysterious men in the history of literature the events in his life were not very well chronicled. Although, he still had a large impact on literature during the Elizabethan Era.
Ever since the author's background has been questioned, scholars and other people have debated over who wrote the famous plays and sonnets that have the name William Shakespeare signed on them. Many alternative candidates have been presented, such as Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford. However, these people do not have strong or valid arguments to support their theories. Based on biographical evidence, Shakespeare, not Edward de Vere, most likely wrote Shakespearean works. The arguments for other candidates like de Vere are not strong enough to show that Shakespeare did not write Shakespearean works.
Though William Shakespeare is recognized as one of literature's greatest influences, very little is actually known about him. What we do know about his life comes from registrar records, court records, wills, marriage certificates and his tombstone. Anecdotes and criticisms by his rivals also speak of the famous playwright and suggest that he was indeed a playwright, poet and an actor.