William Golding Lord Of The Flies Argumentative Essay

503 Words2 Pages

William Golding's claim that human nature is inherently defective connects strongly with the complex fabric of human nature. His most famous work, "Lord of the Flies," reflects the complexity of human nature when the rules of society are abolished. Golding's investigation reveals disturbing facts about human nature by going into the depths of the human mind. To support Golding's claim, this article will analyze the proof offered in "Lord of the Flies" and add to it with new information from different settings. As Jack represents the most terrible habits inherent in human nature, Golding portrays his descent into savagery. It's evident that he is driven by a desire for dominance and power when he declares, "We must have rules and follow them." …show more content…

Furthermore, historical data repeats Golding's claims, reinforcing the idea that human nature is defective. The horrific events that have occurred throughout history, such as wars and genocides, serve as disturbing reminders of the extent to which human nature can descend. Particularly, the Holocaust serves as a horrifying example of the evil that can exist in the human heart. Studies in psychology, like the Stanford Prison Experiment, provide more information about how adaptable human behavior can be in different situations. These real-life examples support Golding's thesis that human nature is essentially defective, corruptible, and easy to manipulate. Moreover, philosophical ideas on human nature offer a more comprehensive framework for comprehending Golding's claims. Philosophers who have long acknowledged the conflicts between civilization and basic preferences, such as Friedrich Nietzsche and Thomas Hobbes, have struggled with the split component that makes up humanity. In his popular description of the natural world as a "war of all against all," Hobbes emphasized the core conflict in relationships between

Open Document