Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of literature on society
Impact of literature on society
Literature and its impact on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of literature on society
Many tragedies have occurred during the last century. William Faulkner believes the greatest tragedy of the last century is that modern writers no longer write of the spirit. On the other hand, in his memoir, Angela’s Ashes, Frank McCourt asserts the Catholic Irish childhood is far worse. However, both tragedies are related as McCourt’s emotional account of his misfortunes exemplifies the profound influence of literature that Faulkner desires other writers to have. In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, William Faulkner sets the standards of good literature that Frank McCourt adheres to through his writings of suffering and compassion. William Faulkner claims it’s the writer’s duty to focus on the universal feelings of love, honor, pity, pride, compassion, and sacrifice. Unfortunately, modern writers no longer concern themselves with “the problems of the human heart in conflict with itself” (Faulkner). These authors only wish to illustrate the story, thinking the lesson lies in the conclusion. However, the greater morals remain with the characters’ responses to these adversities, so the story is only a vessel in which the “universal truths” are conveyed. Using the emotional appeals of the story, the author must “help man endure by lift his heart, by reminding him of the courage and honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and sacrifice which have been the glory of his past.” All people have felt and understand these emotions, but by ignoring them, modern writers have not left a “scar” on readers. Faulkner hopes to enlighten these young writers so that they continue the meritorious work of helping man to endure. Without Faulkner’s standard of good literature, all emotion will be lost in modern informative literature. F... ... middle of paper ... ...orgive oneself for one’s mistakes (343). Although the reader is reminded of the shame of his past, the author, through the character’s consolation, lifts his heart to its prior honor, honor, and compassion. Frank McCourt does as Faulkner suggested and helps the reader endure his own pain mirrored by the character’s confrontation with adversity. In this coming of age story, the reader not only experiences the characters’ suffering and compassion but also shares these emotions with the characters. Faulkner asserted that this connection is essential for good literature, and Frank McCourt succeeds through his writings on suffering and compassion. With the emotional turmoil of the characters, the reader hopes for reconciliation for both the character and himself, so Faulkner’s good literature shows the reader previous falls so that he may prevent his own and prevail.
Upon listening and reading William Faulkner's Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, it is immediately deduced that he provides his vast audience of the epitome of himself. William Faulkner is not someone, but everyone. His humanistic approach to writing and thought has allowed him to hide complexity within simplicity, and for this, he is memorable: his work is a true testament to the unbreakable nature of the human spirit in the face of enormous hardship and consequence; a look into the human mind that is simultaneously interesting and uninteresting. This, along with so much more, is prevalent in this speech, which perfectly conveys the responsibilities of the writers in 1949.
Many people believe that the importance of family is crucial. The memoir Angela’s Ashes is written by Frank McCourt. It examines the poor upbringing and the relationships within the McCourt family during the 1930’s. Through the use of descriptive language, dialogue and characterisation, it supports and opposes various values including the importance of family and the impact it has on the relationships enclosed in the memoir.
On December 10, 1950, in Stockholm, Sweden, one of the greatest literary minds of the twentieth century, William Faulkner, presented his acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize. If one reads in between the lines of this acceptance speech, they can detect a certain message – more of a cry or plead – aimed directly to adolescent authors and writers, and that message is to be the voice of your own generation; write about things with true importance. This also means that authors should include heart, soul, spirit, and raw, truthful emotion into their writing. “Love and honor and pity and pride and compassion and sacrifice” (Faulkner) should all be frequently embraced – it is the duty of authors to do so. If these young and adolescent authors ignore this message and duty, the already endangered state of literature will continue to diminish until its unfortunate extinction.
In Frank McCourt’s memoir Angela’s Ashes, the connection between tone, syntax, and point of view combine to create an effective balance of humor and pathos. This is shown through the perspective of little Frank McCourt. Sometimes it is human nature to try to make a tragedy seem better than it is in order to go on with our lives. Frank’s struggle to make his situation as a poor, Catholic, Irish boy more bearable, is demonstrated through the positive tone, powerful syntax and childlike point of view.
16. James Hinkle and Robert McCoy, Reading Faulkner: The Unvanquished. (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 1995), 141.
In his Novel Prize Address, Faulkner states that an author must leave "no room in his workshop for anything but the old verities and truths of the heart...love and honor and pity and pride and compassion and sacrifice." He accuses his younger contemporaries of ignoring these noble spiritual pillars while pondering the atomic doom of mankind with questions like, "When will I be blown up?" Such physical fears, far from conflicts of the heart, are what plague his bomb-obsessed contemporaries. Yet Faulkner stands, seemingly alone, in opposition to this weakness; he "decline[s] to accept the end of man" and in rebelling, fights for the old universal truths and the glories of the past. In classical style, he brushes away passing fears and fads, settling for nothing less than the "problems of the human heart in conflict with itself." Nothing else is worth writing about and Faulkner's work is living proof.
Faulkner opens his acceptance speech by establishing himself as a humble and modest person, acknowledging that the Nobel Prize, “was not made to me as a man, but to my work.”(line 1) He appeals to the audience by dedicating his speech to the young men and women of the time. Faulkner proceeds by questioning people’s willingness to write with raw emotion, declaring that the tension caused by the Red Fear and Cold War does not nullify a writer’s ability to use the old verities and truths of the heart in their writing. Using his own work as an example, Faulkner argues that in order for a piece of literature to be valuable it must illuminate the universal truths, and embrace the verities of love, honor, pity, pride, compassion, and sacrifice. Expanding
"When I look back on my childhood I wonder how I survived at all. It was, of course, a miserable childhood: the happy childhood is hardly worth your while. Worse than the ordinary miserable childhood is the miserable Irish childhood, and worse yet is the miserable Irish Catholic childhood." Thus begins the highly celebrated memoir by the name of Angela's Ashes, written by Frank McCourt. In this book Frank McCourt writes about his childhood, how his parents meet in New York and then decide to return to Ireland. He describes what it is like to be at the bottom of that city's tough social hierarchy, giving vivid descriptions of how class imposes severe limitations and restrictions. It is this topic, this theme, to which I will be giving the most attention.
McCourt never downplays the fact that he suffered from acute hunger and deprivation in his youth. He once described this autobiography as "an epic of woe." Nothing about the author's boyhood was easy. But Frank's world is not one of self-pity. Although the protagonist endures a troubled upbringing, it is one that instills in him strong moral values and a healthy sense of humor. McCourt's prose style is ambitious in its scope, yet detailed in his focus; it is prosaic in order to capture everyday life, but poetic in order to evoke a homeland.
Any one who’s ever visited the south has a true appreciation for the writings of William Faulkner. Everything ever written by William Faulkner has a trace of the South that can be felt by just reading his words. Growing up in Mississippi, Faulkner was exposed to the Deep South and everything it had to offer, both good and bad. Through his writings, William tackles some of the most difficult issues of his time period and sheds light to the every day issues going on in the South. William Faulkner set the precedent for future generations, and he will arguably never be contested in his southern style. Without William Faulkner, American literature would be blind to the truth of the South and all its glory.
Brooks, Cleanth. "William Faulkner: Visions of Good and Evil." Faulkner, New Perspectives. Ed. Richard H. Brodhead. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, 1983.
Faulkner, William. "A Rose for Emily." Literature: Reading, Reacting, Writing. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Compact 4th ed. Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers, 2000. 81 - 88.
In William Faulkner’s compelling short story, “Barn Burning”, a young boy named Colonel Sartoris Snopes, or Sarty, faces the difficult conflict between his deep desire for justice and his obliged loyalty to his family–specifically his father, Abner. In using a limited omniscient narrator, Faulkner focuses on the main character of Sarty through his thoughts and firsthand experiences, while also producing a greater amount of necessary information to the reader. Sarty’s thoughts during the four days that transpire in the story discern his sense of morality and contrast it to his father’s actions, while the more enlightened aspect of the narrator provides details about the future of Sarty. Faulkner explores a person’s ability to separate from
Faulkner, William. A Rose for Emil and Other Stories. New York: Random House, 2012. Print.
Faulkner covers the concept of mental instability occurring due to a shift in personality as he describes how Darl goes to a mental institution after burning down the barn. By having Darl get taken away, Faulkner shows how society will ostracize people if they do not abide by social normalities. Faulkner also shows how being unaccepted by society can cause a person to lose sense of themselves by showing Darl’s thought processes after he was taken. Darl’s thoughts consist of inquiries toward himself, asking, “[w]hy do you laugh?” repeatedly and not knowing the answer (Faulkner 254). These ways of thinking show how trauma has such a prominent role in altering the way a person behaves. Because if Darl was his usual self, he would be able to find meaning in his behavior. Rationalizing his behavior is a characteristic Darl proved to be capable of when convincing Anse to allow him to make the three dollars at the beginning of the novel. This further shows how negative experiences can impact the way a person behaves by making them lose sight of