Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities between Plato and Aristotle
Similarities between Plato and Aristotle
Aristotle's influence on
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Similarities between Plato and Aristotle
William James Durant, a prominent American author, historian and philosopher, published The Story of Philosophy in 1926. He thought of philosophy as an all-encompassing study and endeavored the unification and humanization of all historical knowledge, which had grown too vast and had become infinitely categorized into miniscule specialties, in order to vitalize it for modern day use. Durant was a gifted writer of magnificent prose and also a storyteller who had harvested an incredible readership. His brilliant writing, which, rather than being dull, formal academic jargon, is witty and colorful, even catering to the senses. Durant’s publisher, Max Schuster, remarked that Durant's writing pleaded “to be read aloud”; it was also remarked that Durant’s fluid technique resulted in "prose so beautiful it rivals poetry.”
Durant’s profoundly varied studies culminated in his authoring of a book that concerned the universal history of human philosophy. What inspired the fantastic scholar Plato to plant his novel notions into the mind of Aristotle, and what led the resultant influence of Aristotle to impact Alexander the Great? This is one of the innumerable gems of history covered in Durant’s manuscript The Story of Philosophy: The Lives and Opinions of the Greater Philosophers. One of the most striking aptitudes of Durant’s work of historiography is its quality of identifying numerous celebrated western philosophers and providing psychological profiles for these figures, thereby describing their teachings and thoughts applicable to the metaphysical world. Such men were absolute geniuses and influenced the totality of humankind’s sentiments in such a way as to irrevocably alter the course of history, either for the better or worse.
In his...
... middle of paper ...
...ion of racism and prejudice.
Will Durant’s book The Story of Philosophy is indeed a historical, philosophical, and remarkably literary treasure. It provides valuable insight into the minds of men that were instrumental to the philosophical realm and, perhaps more imperatively, assisted in the shaping of humanity as it is today in terms of morals and basic foundations of thought. This piece of historiography truly finalized my studies for the past three years in a marvelous and proper way as Durant’s works have been such a pivotal keystone in my academic maturation; to leaf through one of this eminent historian’s crucial masterworks was immeasurably rewarding, as I could, from time to time, detect hints of his natural and charismatic writing style that bears an often humorous and distinctly human, rather than mechanical, character despite its undeniable objectivity.
ABSTRACT: Vico's concept of the Heroic Mind forms the pedagogical basis for his view of the liberal arts in university education. It is also the key to understanding his humanist critique of Cartesian epistemology. This essay studies Vico's Heroic Mind concept as revealed in his 1732 De mente heroica Oration, discusses the nature of Vico's challenge to Descartes' view of the human person and of knowledge, and points out the development of Vico's ideas on mind, education, and knowledge from his earlier works. Vico's writings not only offer a portrait of eighteenth century European intellectual and cultural thought, but also prophesy the change, disruption, and dehumanization that result from the exaggerated emphases on rationality as the end of all knowledge divorced from other physical, emotional, natural, or historical contingencies and from a neglect of the de mente heroica concept at the foundation of the humanistic world view. His understanding of the state of learning, wisdom, and culture in his own age as well as his exposure to the aversion of the Cartesian mathematical paradigm which discounted the Heroic Mind issues forth in an understanding of the forces driving modern technological society and the problems plaguing contemporary consciousness and life. He has influenced and inspired much modern thinking in sociology, politics, anthropology, language, pedagogy, literature, psychology, and even science. It is the concept of the historical and cultural evolution of the Heroic Mind which Vico passionately pursued in his monumentally creative The New Science.
Plato, author of the Phaedo, was the second member of the brilliant philosophical flourish of ancient Athens that began with Socrates, continued through him and then culminated with Aristotle. Thou...
Aristotle 's great-souled man is not only an inaccurate depiction of greatness of soul, honour, perfect virtue and human excellence, but also a hypocritical, short-tempered and insensitive human being. Aristotle describes the great-souled man as being the ultimate person but as Fetter points out in Aristotle’s Great-Souled Man: The Limited Perfection of the Ethical Virtues, we see that there are many flaws in his account. This article looks at the contradictory statements being made about Aristotle’s great-souled man by loyal readers of his works, other philosophers and metaphysicians before Aristotle’s time who seem to have a sense for the worth of honour. We see that nearly all of Aristotle’s statements regarding the great-souled man can
The mindsets of people in society are often heavily influenced by the conflicts and circumstances that are common within the time-span in which these people lived. In times of war, people may be more patriotic; in times of pestilence, people may be more pious. Whether cynical or optimistic, the understandings of these mindsets allow for a better insight into how theses people lived their lives and the philosophies that guided them. In the case of the philosophers Plato and Epictetus, their philosophies sprang up amidst collapsing cities and exile. Plato and Epictetus’ philosophies differed due to their individual experiences in that Plato believed that all is not what it seemed, while Epictetus believed that what was presented should only matter if they are within an individual’s concern.
Philosophy can best be described as an abstract, scholarly discourse. According to the Greek, philosophia refers to ‘love of knowledge’. This is an aspect that has involved a great number of clever minds in the world’s history. They have sought to deal with issues surrounding the character of veracity and significantly exploring the endeavors to respond to these issues. This paper seeks to compare and contrast the philosophy of Aristotle with that of Confucius. This is with a clear concentration on the absolute functions of these philosophies and how they take care of the particular responsibility of a person and the broader society and the resultant effects on societies (Barnes, 1995).
The. The "Aristotle". Home Page English 112 VCCS Litonline. Web. The Web.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig; G. E. M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte (eds. and trans.). Philosophical Investigations. 4th edition, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. Print.
Moore, Brooke Noel., and Kenneth Bruder. "Chapter 6- The Rise of Metaphysics and Epistemology; Chapter 9- The Pragmatic and Analytic Traditions; Chapter 7- The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries." Philosophy: the Power of Ideas. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2011. Print.
This paper will focus on a modern worldview that uses theories and other ideas presented by the great minds of the past. I will seek to explain why some philosopher’s ideas have become engrained in our thoughts without us even realizing they exist. My goal is to invert the title of this class, A Brief History of Imagination, by using imagination to explain why many historical events occurred.
ABSTRACT: In Vico’s New Science wisdom is understood in a double sense. On the one hand, wisdom means the poetic wisdom that provides intelligibility for the peoples of the nations during their early stages of development. On the other hand, wisdom means the noetic knowledge gained by the Vichian scientist who contemplates concrete historicity in the light of the New Science. By means of an examination of three principle aspects of Vico’s science, and by looking to his conception of the origin of the most rudimentary institutions of humanity, primordial piety— fear of the mythic other— is shown to be the origin of poetic wisdom. And, by focusing on the necessity of surmounting the conceit of scholars and the conceit of nations for a science of universal history, philosophical piety— openness to the wholly Other— is revealed as the ground of philosophical wisdom. This paper sets out to show how Vico’s science of the principles of humanity is, at the same time, a science of the unity of piety and wisdom.
In the field of philosophy there can be numerous answers to a general question, depending on a particular philosopher's views on the subject. Often times an answer is left undetermined. In the broad sense of the word and also stated in the dictionary philosophy can be described as the pursuit of human knowledge and human values. There are many different people with many different theories of knowledge. Two of these people, also philosophers, in which this paper will go into depth about are Descartes and Plato. Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy and Plato's The Republic are the topics that are going to be discussed in this paper.
Coplestone, Frederick. A History of Philosophy- Greece and Rome. New York: Image Books,1962. (pgs 64-70).
Abernathy, George L., and Thomas A. Langford. Introduction to Western Philosophy: Pre-Socratics to Mill. Belmont: Dickenson, 1970.
Melchert, Norman. The Great Conversation: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy. 4th ed. Toronto: McGraw Hill Companies, 2002.
Gilbert, Allan H. "The Aristotelian Catharsis." The Philosophical Review 35.2 (1926): 301-14. Web. 5 Apr. 2014.