Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of media in our everyday living
Effects of media in our everyday living
Impacts of media in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of media in our everyday living
WHich Is Better MOVIE OR BOOK In my opinion, the movie is ultimately better than the book. even though the book has more explaining about the thoughts and things in the 2 worlds, the movie attracts more attention as it has more suspense and action which everyone loves to see. The only disadvantage of movies is that the characters have no thoughts, and if movies have them, the audience would most likely understand the characters more. I think u would not like going home after watching a movie then asking questions to your brothers or sisters asking a load of questions would you? They won’t like it too! Even so, the movie is always ultimately better than the book. Books are very popular before the movie comes out because they have the original writing and idea. If you did not know, all movies do not exactly follow the book’s idea. The developers made So that the movie will have more suspense, because if not, movies won’t be so popular nowadays. Sometimes authors makes their books so …show more content…
It helps to attract more attention from the audience. It is because people may review the movie on websites, so the movie can earn more money(Of course). The second advantage is that there is action found in any parts of the movie. Action is essential to keep the audience awake, having suspense with it is even better. For example, in the book, Coraline is supposed to have a tea party when she was with the other mother’s hand. Instead, in the movie, it depicted Coraline And Wybie Fighting the hand. The third advantage is that we all know, a book, is full of words. A movie has people talking in it. In books, it my say, “Mr.Bobinsky has a funny accent, which made Coraline snigger at it when she hear it.” The readers may want to find out how the funny accent really sounds. But of course, movies definitely must have disadvantages, as they aren't
This is my view on the movie and book. I likes the movie better the book because the
Second there is more detail in the book than the movie. Well, I think that more detail is better because the more you know the better you understand the movie or
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
I like the reading book better than watching the movie because there are more facts in the book than the movie. Maybe I just like reading books better than watching movies. That’s my opinion. What’s yours (if you’ve read the book and seen the movie)?
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
I wish people were to get jealous of me, all I get is their pity. and he had a career ending blow to the head, In the book he was kicked somewhere which pretty much ended his life. This difference makes people hate the book or the movie. Another interesting difference is Bernard’s role.
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
It is a fool-proof system born to ensure absolute safety…but when it crumbles, would you go against everything it stands for just to save it? This is the platform that Philip K. Dick, author of the sci-fi short story "The Minority Report" (MR), has given us. Set in a futuristic New York City, we see Police Commissioner John A. Anderton as the founder of a promising new branch of policing: Precrime, a system that uses "Precogs" (mutated and retarded oracles) to predict all future crimes. However, the system appears to backfire when Anderton himself is accused to kill a man he's never even heard of. The movie adaptation by the same name also centers on a younger Chief Anderton, a respected employee of Precrime, predicted to murder a complete stranger who he was unaware existed. Amidst scandal, betrayal, and distrust, both Andertons must run from the justice system they've worked so hard to put in place, and admit to themselves, as well as to society, that a perfect system cannot be born of imperfect humans. Though the basis of the film's plot and major conflict stayed true to the story's, many changes were made to the personalities and roles of the characters, as well as the nature and detail of the main conflict and the sub-conflicts.
One thing that can make a book good is characters. In the book, there were many more animals in the farm. The movie did not show many animals except for the main animals. Even thought this is a small difference, it can be noticeable. In the book, Mollie was a character.
First of all, the movie is concise and more meaningful than the original book. Take an easy example of Macbeth, the movie
From reading the book and watching the movie, I think the book was more insightful, but the movie was more entertaining. The only problem with the movie is that you don't know what is going through Chance's mind and his background information. The movie does help make some things clearer by seeing it, instead of just picturing it in your mind. The added scenes in the movie helps to put some humor into the story and make it more entertaining. By just watching the movie, some people could be confused if they don't know some background on Chance. I think that by reading the book, you can understand the story better and by watching the movie you can enjoy the story better.
A movie that came out in 2002 was Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. This movie was based off the best-selling novel, which was written in 1997 by J.K. Rowling, called Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. If you were to read this book and watch the movie you would find many differences, but the main difference between the two is that the book gives more information to the reader than the movie gives to the viewer. If someone was to watch the movie instead of reading the book, that person would not be able to have an accurate perception of the book because so many things in the book are changed in the movie or parts are left out of the movie completely. This is mainly because the book has more characters and chapters, which are able to keep the reader informed and interested. Still, the movie is shorter so that people who want a quick summary of the storyline can get it,
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie and saw many differences? Well you can also find lots of similarities. In the book “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and the movie “Tom and Huck” there are many similarities and differences having to do with the characters personalities, the setting, the characters relationships with one another and the events that take place.
Also, books usually have more characters and give continued suspense so that the reader will be hooked or addicted to finish the book to find out the story. On the other hand, movie producers need to eliminate so many details about the story in order to squeeze everything into one to two hours. Due to this, those people who love detail information about stories usually prefer books than movies as movies does not have a detailed information about the story. Furthermore, reading books can not only enhance the reader’s vocabulary and creativity, but also increase their reading and writing skills, while watching movies only provides entertainment (Lee, wordpress.com).