Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is youtubes effect on the music industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is youtubes effect on the music industry
Over four billion YouTube videos are viewed each day. They have to pay operating cost pay for employees and pay people to literally take down videos that don’t fit into the YouTube standard. YouTube is free for most videos and all they ask is for the viewer to watch part of an ad in which after around 20 seconds you can skip the commercial which might pay for the free viewing. YouTube should continue the previously decided royalties to keep them financially safe. One has to remember that not all content on YouTube produces any form of money. Since certain videos receives payment artists have begun to become aggravated. YouTube has recently been getting heat from certain big name artists, such as Katy Perry, Rod Stewart, and Deadmau5, wanting more money and accusing YouTube of getting a free ride from videos the artist does not have control of (lyric videos, fan videos, etc.) Some artist believe that YouTube should be paying them more for having their music content on their network. Though YouTube is basically providing free advertisement for their music many do not believe its advertising at all. And many fans visit the site to research the music then decide to purchase it or not from another source.
Furthermore, each
…show more content…
YouTube pays a royalty toward every view for contracted artists. Yes, YouTube pays a sixth of what Spotify or Apple. Apple music has 17 million subscribers and Spotify having 40 billion. But YouTube has more views then both apple and Spotify in turn the artist is still making a large sum of money. YouTube only gets money if the viewer watches the ad for 30 plus seconds or clicks on the link on the ad. Commercials on YouTube are what make the content have a monetary value. More views of a video more of a chance the advertisement will produce funding that pays the artist. But the artist makes a point what about the creative value, the intellectual property, of their
Sponsorship and advertisement music more or less do good for artists. From loss of money from album sales, advertising and sponsorships in music often put money in the artist's pocket. This is good for most artists struggling from album sales to make a living.
An “analyst” was quoted in the case (in 2002) as saying that “people will pay for music on the Internet, eventually.” This person was skeptical of the willingness of consumers to pay for
Does selling songs to a commercial company really worth it? Singers started selling out their music to companies that use their songs in their commercials. Some musicians highly disagree with selling their songs to commercials, but other think that it is very beneficial to them. They say that the commercials help them gain popularity, they get highly compensated which helps them support the band and after all it is the band’s chose to have their song in a commercial. Artist’s music should be used in advertisement.
...'t become free." Of all industries that have been revolutionized by modern technology, few have been hit as hard as the music industry. This digital era has unfortunately for music producers, made it easier than ever for consumers to get music access without paying for it. Stealing music, let alone anything in existence, is strictly against the law. Despite the legal offense of the matter, stealing music over the internet betrays the recording artists who create it. Inescapably, stealing music threatens the occupation of the thousands of working people who contributed to producing the music. In all, this sweeping music thievery is detrimental to the entire music community, and to those downloading illegally. There is a great deal of uncertainty about how copyright laws should function in the digital world, but the laws themselves are clear. So please, enjoy the music.
The fact is that buying a song or album won't affect the original artist in the slightest (economically speaking). If an artist is famous, it generally means that he/she is affiliated with a major record label, and therefore not autonomous. This is where the swindling comes in. Brian Reed proclaims that "A low-end royalty deal only pays 30 cents per album sale" (Who Really Profits From Your iTunes Downloads?). If one hundred full-length albums are purchased each day on this contract (which is outrageous, especially for an up-and-coming artist), the performer will make $10,950 in an entire year. If the musician is part of a band or group, then that profit still has to be split evenly amongst members. Nobody can live off of $11,000/year in the first place, so how is one supposed to support his/herself? The answer is simple: he/she must find a second job.
ever wanted the rest of the world to see what you look like and how you speak, and as if you 're directly talking to them ?
First of all it’s successfully fighting against piracy, and turns former pirates into music consumers. Because there’s no reason why one would steal music when it can be easily “taken” for free in an absolutely legal way that benefits not only music consumers but artists too. And even though you can use Spotify for free more and more people are getting premium membership and paying the $9.99 monthly fee in return to get add free music streaming and the availability to listen to music offline. But some major labels are pushing Spotify towards limiting freemium membership, to convince more people to pay monthly fee, Ek refuses to do it, for obvious reasons – people will always find ways to get music for free, so if they won’t get it on Spotify they will find other places to do it and most likely in an illegal way. But still quite a few well known artist like Radiohead’s Thom Yorke, Taylor Swift, Johnny Marr and many others who are against Spotify, stating that it’s paying pennys for artist and that they are giving up their music for free, and staying with iTunes rather than Spotify. iTunes, in my opinion, is good for short term income, as when people buy a song they can listen to it as many times as they want and artist don’t get any more income from that song after someone have bought it, where as if an artist have their songs on Spotify even after 20 years
There has been controversy as to whether music should be free or not. As for the people who love to listen to music all the time, they would agree that the music should be free of charge. Benefits of free music are that you can listen to music fan free, helps out bands to be known, and reaches the crowds in less time and boots the popularity of the song; however, there are drawbacks, such as CD & MP3 gross sales decline, it’s an insult & harmful to artist and in all actuality, you are paying the record labels.
Overall, I am disagreeing with music downloading as a good idea, which couldn’t 100% protect artists. Many artists can take advantages of it and become famous, but did you know they still cannot get reciprocally benefit. The problem now is that the government has to administer strict law to stop illegal downloading and websites that provide it. If people cannot follow the rules, the free music downloading should be restricted.
Spotify is operating on “mixed advertising/freemium business model”. The freemium business model is based on idea that the company offers simple and basic services for free for the user to try and more advanced or additional features at a premium [3]. One important role in Spotify’s business model is having advertisers who generate revenue that is used to finance costs of free subscription. In other words, without ads, there would be no free music.
Online education is a booming trend in the education world. It is something different than the traditional classroom. It is allowing student around the world the opportunity to get an education. Online education allows student to have a more proficient and cheaper way of learning. Having multiple ways to give a student an education allows all learning types to find their own way of learning. Education changes lives but it can be difficult for students to get to a classroom to sit through an hour class 4 times a week, this can be for many different reasons. There are many doubts about online education, but this a new world without borders it is a new opportunity for people from all over the world to get an education.
...llegally is actually helping them. The fans who listen to the music are the ones whose opinions matter the most and the ones who shape the music. So when one downloads a song, they are making that song become more popular. Tom Durrant points out, “Without it, we wouldn’t have Spotify and a summer full of packed out arenas” (Durrant). These downloads, even though they may be illegal, are what is making these songs and artists so popular. It can also be argued that “illegal downloads boost legal downloads” (Rothman). Some people believe that others download music illegally for the songs they never would have spent money on. It can also be argued that if the music had not been there for illegal downloading, most people would not have even listened to that music at all. But the main problem in the matter is still that illegal downloading will cause more harm than good.
Youtube is a website designed to share videos online. Its intention was to post and share video content but quickly became a website to share anything through a video. Millions of people have created an account to allow them to share what ever they wanted to the rest of the world. Sending a video file via email could often be very large causing a lot problems but when Youtube came, they made it easy to share videos without having to send large files. Youtube revolutionised video sharing on the internet, making it easy to watch full length feature films, commenting and rating on them without having to download large files that requires a lot of time. Youtube was founded in February 2005 by Chad Hurley, Jawed Karim and Steve Chan. Youtube used Flash Video and HTML5 to allow users to create and post videos as easily as possible. As Youtube got more and more popular the term ‘viral video’ became a well know term, it refers to a clip that’s been liked and shared so much that its been sent and seen by millions and possibly billions of people worldwide. If a Youtube channel is popular enoug...
Imagine someone born in the early 1900’s entering a modern-day classroom. They would likely be confused as to what televisions, computers, cell phones, and other electronic devices are. It is also likely that they would be overwhelmed by the instant access to information that the internet provides. Digital media has become a large part of people’s everyday lives especially with the rise of digital media in classrooms. Digital media is growing so rapidly that people who are not adapting to this shift in culture are falling behind and becoming victims of the “digital divide”, this is leaving people misinformed. Digital media has a large effect on the way that people communicate, this is especially evident in the way that students interact with
Society is feeling the impact of the shift in educational options. However, while there are more opportunities for students, there is another door opened for inequality to take place. As technology advances, a social phenomenon is beginning to change the way that Americans are obtaining college degrees. Approximately 3.2 million students were enrolled in at least one completely online class in the fall semester of 2005 (Clark-Ibanez & Scott, 2008). The effects of technological advances within the educational setting are having an impact on the way in which students are learning, leaving some students with limited options.