Why Were The Articles Of Confederation Ineffective?

1106 Words3 Pages

What was a new nation to do in this great time of need? We were at war with the British and needed to rally the states together to fund and win this war. This led to the first American constitution, the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was a forced and rush agreement written so the new nation of the United States of America could have a chance to win independence of the British. It was only a short period of time once the Articles of Confederation was written and signed that it was apparent there was a need for a more detailed and workable constitution for our new nation. Why was the Articles of Confederation ineffective? Why was a new constitution needed? First of all, the Articles of Confederation lacked a strong national government. Many of the men that drafted the Articles of Confederation were worried about a strong national government like they had from England. Therefore, the Articles established "the United States of America" as a union formed to protect the states as a whole but left very few powers …show more content…

The Articles left it in the states hands to tax it’s people and very few states complied with the agreement. Therefore, Congress had to fund a war and help run a nation without the necessary funding. It caused the central government to print “constitutional dollars” without the necessary backing of gold or silver. Matters were only made worse by not having a unilateral money system. Each state seemed to use its own type of currency which made trade between states and other countries extremely difficult. This caused an economic depression in America along with the lack of power to regulate trade. The new “Constitution” allowed the national government to tax and control trade between states and other nations which provided more balance in the nation’s

Open Document