Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The negative effects of plastic bags
The negative effects of plastic bags
The negative effects of plastic bags
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The negative effects of plastic bags
Hawaii just became the first state in the U.S. to completely ban plastic bags from being distributed at grocery store check-outs. California attempted to pass a similar ban that's now being delayed, and at least 132 cities in 18 states have banned plastic shopping bags.
The U.S. is late to this party -- the whole EU, China, India, Australia, Rwanda, and many other countries have already instituted full-on bans on plastic bags. Plastics have a huge environmental cost, and this is one simple step we can take toward fixing it. Here are 9 reasons we should ban the bag:
[listicle order="up"]
[item]
Plastic bags last forever (literally), and we use SO MANY OF THEM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koETnR0NgLY
Approximately 100 billion plastic bags are thrown away in the U.S. every year, which is the equivalent of dumping almost 12 million barrels of oil into the environment. Globally, we use an estimated 1 trillion plastic bags every year -- nearly two bags per minute. The average "use-time" for a bag is 12 minutes, but plastic doesn't decompose. Like, ever. So after just 12 minutes of use, plastic bags continue to haunt us indefinitely.
[/item]
…show more content…
[item] Plastic bags kill marine life -- slowly and painfully https://youtu.be/csfQ6StBWcU Every year, tens of thousands of seals, whales, birds, and turtles die from plastic bags in the ocean.
Lots of animals, including sea turtles, mistake the plastic bags for food because they resemble jellyfish.
One study found that one in three leatherback sea turtles have plastic in their stomachs -- and it's usually plastic bags. When a sea turtles swallows a plastic bag, its digestive track gets blocked, which causes the turtle to become buoyant so it can no longer dive for food. This causes thousands of sea turtles to slowly starve to death while floating on the surface of the ocean.
[/item] [item] Even when you "recycle" plastic bags, they often still end up in landfills and oceans https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj5F2TD8nsA Plastic bags jam and damage the sorting machines used at most recycling plants. As a result, unless you're taking your bags to a plastic bag-specific recycling facility, they're going to a landfill -- or into the ocean. Even worse: There is almost no market for recycled plastic bags, and because of issues surrounding cleanliness, sorting and high costs, many bags sent to plastic bag recycling facilities still end up in landfills. Only 3% of plastic bags produced are ever actually ever recycled. [/item] [item] Producing plastic bags is also brutal on the environment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CfL5xl2N1Q Plastic bag production requires petroleum, a non-renewable resource. Drilling for petroleum wreaks havoc on the environment, and plastic bag production uses up an estimated 8% of our oil resources. [/item] [item] Plastic bags are making the Great Pacific Garbage Patch bigger by the minute https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLgh9h2ePYw According to Ocean Conservancy, plastic bags are among the top ten pieces of garbage collected on beaches around the world. And thanks to converging ocean currents, there's now a floating island of plastic garbage that's now two times bigger than Texas in the middle of the Pacific ocean. Even scarier, ecologists recently discovered that about 70% of plastic in the ocean sinks to the bottom instead of floating, so there's even more (maybe a LOT more) than the massive amount of plastic we can see floating around in the ocean. [/item] [related_link href="http://www.mtv.com/news/2138168/9-reasons-earth-day-matters-more-in-2015-than-it-ever-has-before/" text="9 Reasons Earth Day Matters More In 2015 Than It Ever Has Before"] [item] The plastics industry is sleazy as f*ck https://youtu.be/qpyXaaQRk-U Remember all those years the tobacco industry tried to convince us all by any means necessary that cigarettes aren't actually bad for your health? The plastics industry is up to similar tricks, making claims that that plastic bags are really just fine for the environment, and sponsoring ads that try to convince people to vote against bag bans in local elections. They're even funding studies to try to convince us that reusable bags are bad for our health. Mother Jones reports that a "plastics-industry-backed study at the University of Arizona prompted fears after finding E. coli in 12 percent of tested reusable canvas grocery bags -- though the lead author of the report told NPR that the bacteria found would not make the average healthy person sick. The report also found that more than 99.9 percent of bag bacteria can be killed by machine or hand washing..." [/item] [item] Poisons from plastics is creeping up the food chain -- and starting to poison us https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjT8GG0ETQg Although plastic bags never biodegrade, they do break down into smaller and smaller particles until they're tiny enough to enter the food chain -- tiny plastic particles now outnumber plankton 6 to 1. Eventually, that leads toxins from plastics up the food chain and back to us. Inuit women have been found to have exceptionally high levels of toxins like PCB, a chemical compound used in plastic, in their breast milk -- because they eat more marine mammals from the top of the food chain than most of us. Non-Inuits aren't safe either: 93% of Americans over the age of six now test positive for BPA, a chemical found in plastics that is definitely not supposed to be found in humans. [/item] [item] Reusable tote bags are hella cute https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5qzquNaxCA Trendy, reusable shopping bags are a way better look than plastic, and they come in sizes that fold up into pouches small enough to keep in your pocket, bag, or car. You can also make your own totes out of old t-shirts, or hunt for cool vintage totes at thrift stores and online. [/item] [item] Bans are incredibly effective at reducing plastic bag waste https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgTXgPtJiQg Four years after China banned them, there were 40 billion fewer plastic bags put out into the world. It's estimated that a U.S. ban would mean 253 billion fewer bags in landfills (and oceans) every year. Plastic bags weren't even introduced to grocery stores until 1977, and they've already caused so much damage. It's time to get rid of them before they can do any more. [/item] [/listicle]
Using plastic bags were something everyone feels bad using. We use them everyday in some form or another, but we tend to forget the bad that they do. Plastic bags should not be used or allowed in the U.S because it tends to do more harm than good in our society or world.
...stic breaks down into smaller bits that are not as easy to spot. These small pieces are then consumed by the oceans small organisms that are also the bottom of the oceans food chain. Once it enters the ocean food chain, plastic and its toxins can then be transferred to humans through the ingestion of seafood. The Midway Islands in the Pacific Ocean are home to many different bird species including the world’s largest number of albatrosses. Plastic items and waste materials are washed onto shore and mistaken by the birds as food. A wildlife manager by the name of Matt Brown cut open a dead albatross and found the contents of its stomach to have a large amount of plastic items including a part of a toothbrush, a bottle cap, and pieces of an old fishing net. Brown agrees with most scientists that it is going to take effort from society as a whole to fix this issue.
Which means their obviously bad for the aquatic marine life environment & are cause many different forms of damage for them & us as one. On p.g. 23 of The New York Times upfront magazine “Birds,fish, sea turtles, & others are getting tangled in plastic bags or mistake them for food & choke”. Someone else might argue that they could the plastic bags in landfills instead of oceans. But that counter- argument is flawed because you’re just polluting by burning plastic which is bad on our part we’re not doing our part to support & taking care of the earth. Plastic in the ocean isn't just bad for plants & animals but for humans too because of the food chain some of us eat animals as a meat source such as aqua marine life like fish. If the fishermen catch fish that have been eating plastic then it's in our food supply if we eat that fish it's gonna be bad for us so many will end up getting sick from the plastic inside of the fish then what will we do our aqua marine food supply will go down the drain we couldn’t eat the fish since it's basically contaminated with plastic that we’re dumping there instead of trying to fix it & getting rid of plastic bags for good for the good of the earth. We’re causing damage towards the earth by dumping all that plastic into the ocean which damages our water supply it’ll poison us although we clean the water it depends on how big the plastic particles are, it’ll make us sick & sense it’s been lying in the oceans could bring in new pathogens &
From all of the pollution in the ocean sea turtles suffer from toxic metals poisoning, this affects the liver and the kidneys of the turtle. If sea turtles get ill from this they become more vulnerable to pray and they become lost which causes them to bump into boats. Even though plastic bags and other plastic like items break down from sunlight the molecules from the plastic will still be there just broken down into smaller pieces. All of the small particles from the plastic coalesce in the oceans currents making it go down in rivers that lead to the ocean where it can hard marine life such as sea turtles. When this happens sea turtles consume the plastic not knowing the dangers behind it.
He goes on to quote that plastic bags “produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions, require 70% less energy to make, generate 80% less waste, and utilize less than 4% of the amount of water needed to manufacture them.” These statistics further his argument about how little plastic bags actually harm the environment, and states how much better they are. He reasons that it makes sense, since plastic bags are lighter and take up less space than the alternative paper bags. In paragraph 6, he also points out the problems with reusable bags, another alternative to plastic bags. He provides the findings of several studies that state “plastic bag bans lead to increased health problems due to food contamination.”
There is also debate on how much better biodegradable plastics are in the first place. This is because as biodegradable plastics break down, they break up into smaller and smaller pieces, but never quite disappear. This leaves the potential that the plastic would continue entering the food chain. But although biodegradable plastics aren’t perfect, they are still much safer than standard plastic and present a much lower risk. In addition, by making the shift to ban single use plastics, research towards better plastic alternatives will speed up and better solutions will become available. Over time, these new alternatives to plastics may spread to other items that aren’t single use, making an even greater impact on the health of humans and the
“Paper or plastic?” This is often a question customers are asked at the weekly trip to the supermarket to purchase groceries to keep families fed. Adam B. Summers has created a highly plausible argument that may change customer’s answer next time. In Summers’ “Bag ban bad for freedom and environment” editorial for the San Diego Union-Tribune, he argues against the possible laws hindering Californians from using plastic bags at grocery stores. He believes they would do more harm than good, and that “a little reason and perspective is in order.” By the end of this piece the reader will likely find themselves nodding in agreement with what Summers has to say, and this isn’t just because he’s right. Summers, like any good writer, employs tactical
These omnivores eat mollusks, marine algae, crustaceans, sea urchins, fish, jellyfish and their favorite- sponges (Hawksbill Sea Turtle, National Geographic). Being their favorite food, hawksbills can eat an average of 1200 lbs of sponges a year. Despite the sponges being made up of tiny glasslike needles, eating them does no harm to the turtles. Some of the turtles’ food can be toxic, but the turtles are able to absorb the toxins through their body fat without being harmed them or becoming ill (Hawksbill Sea Turtle, National Wildlife). Feeding on these sponges also benefits underwater ecosystems by allowing more space for other organisms to
When the plastics enter into the oceans, some young fish are drawn to them, and seem to think that it is food, and they end up preferring the plastic to their natural food sources which eventually starves them before they can reach their reproductive age. The microplastics have been found in the bodies of whales, seabirds, and fish. Marine organisms ingest the particles, but they are unable to digest them, this leads to a buildup in the digestive tracts of the animals which hinders the microorganisms from taking in more food, and it diminishes the organisms feeding stimulus which can lead to starvation (Fossi, M. C, 2014). Studies have proved that the physiological consequences of crabs taking up polystyrene microspheres through their gills are minimal. When the crabs inhale polystyrene microspheres into their gills chambers, it leads to a small but temporary change in ion regulation and oxygen
Following his quick introduction of the issue’s background, Summers immediately gave his estimation of the costs of the bag ban. He estimated the possible losses caused by the bag ban on retailers, highlighting the ban would cost “2 million dollars in total sales and 10,000 square feet of retail space” per year. Summers used such estimations to highlight that the suspected culprits of plastic bag pollution, the retailers, would be a major victim of the bag ban. This plausible estimation began the passage in a firm stance that the bag ban would cause more harm towards the people than solving the plastic pollution problem.
Plastic or paper, is a choice that people face when going to the grocery stores. Plastic bags are often the choice that is made. A controversial issue in the world today is the use of plastic bags. Plastic bags are used because of the convenience they give, by being able to carry several items at once. However, in the article, “Banning Bans, Not Bags”, Jennifer Schultz claims, “Plastic bags clog up local waterways, litter roadways, and get swallowed up by unsuspecting fish” (6). Plastic bags are used once, then are discarded or, littered all over the place. When they are littered all over they become problems for more than just humans. These plastic bags pose a big hazard for animals on land and in especially the ocean. Humans eat land and
This essay will discuss the various harmful effects of plastic bags, and demonstrate the risks that these bags impose on humans, animals, and the environment. It will also discuss a series of suggested solutions that could help reduce plastic bag usage. Although plastic bags appear to be fragile and light, their negative environmental effect is devastating. Plastic bags may cause large amounts of pollution at every step of their limited life cycle, from the extraction of raw materials, production, transportation, and recycling or disposal. Plastic bags can be defined as the most damaging form of environmental pollution.
Everyone has heard a cashier one time or another mumble, “Paper or plastic?” as he put their groceries in a bag, but do shoppers know the effects of each vessel in which they carry their comestibles? There are many issues and benefits to both paper and plastic. The making and recycling of both paper and plastic bags can harm the environment. One must also look at the costs of making each bag. The convenience of each is also something to look at. Many people jump to conclusion that paper bags are better for the environment without knowing the facts. Since plastic bags are preferred by customers and plastic bags actually do not hurt the environment as much as paper ones do, consumers should feel at ease when choosing plastic.
In daily life, people use a lot of plastic which is a polymeric material that is used in products, such as bottles, trash bags, plastic crockeries, and many more. At any given moment, it is obvious that most things around us are made of plastic including, dishes, carrier bags and twist ties. While using these products, people do not have the slightest idea if these plastic products impact the environment, where they come from, where they are taken away after they throw them, or even the materials used to make these products. The only thing people are generally concerned with is that the plastic bags fulfil their temporary needs. Although plastic can make people’s lives easier, it can
More than fifty species of birds are known to ingest plastic. When they eat plastic, they feel full, so some of them die of starvation. Algal blooms are another thing that kills marine life. Algal blooms are sea scum, whale food, and sea sawdust. Algal blooms are bundles of fine threads, rusty brown, they have a fishy smell, and are common in August through December.