Why We Should Be Punished For Lennie's Death

846 Words2 Pages

Numerous people believe that a person's life should be saved at all costs, but if the person is too far gone, it may not even be worth keeping them alive. In the novella Of Mice and Men, the author, John Steinbeck, introduces a mercy killing controversy. The story starts off by following two men in the 1930s, that are best friends. They talk about getting a job and putting down a stake to live off of the land. Lennie, one of the men, has a mental illness that causes him to act like a child. He will often fail to remember things, accidentally kill animals because of his unprecedented strength, and become upset easily. This ends up placing him into a severe dilemma and he ends up murdering a man’s wife. George chooses to end Lennie’s life so …show more content…

George killed Lennie purely out of love, compassion, and to save him from being locked up in jail or shot by Curley. After George and Candy find Curley’s wife dead, they debate whether or not Lennie should be punished for his crimes. Candy and George argue, “‘He’s such a nice fella. I didn’ think he’d do nothing like this.’ George still stared at Curely’s [dead] wife. ‘Lennie never done it in meanness,’ he said. ‘All the time he done bad things, but he never done one of ‘em mean,’” (Steinbeck 95). This shows that Lennie cannot apprehend situations that go on around him and that taking his life would mean no one else's life is being put at risk by him. Therefore, George shooting Lennie was the appropriate decision to make for himself, Lennie, and the rest of society. On the same note, a man in Ohio shoots his wife because he believes she never would have gotten better after experiencing a triple aneurysm that put her on life support. …show more content…

Admittedly, they believe letting a person with a disability wander around exposed to negative sources is a good idea. Many people despise and purposely upset a debilitated being for fun. Any person that agrees to let a living thing suffer, human or animal, is ignorant to the mental pain and mental problems that reside within a person if left untreated. At least a mother has attempted curing her son of his autism, but he, Jude Jordan, has failed to get any better and is susceptible to bad behavior from the adults around him “She asked Tzekov to leave their home. But over the course of the next several months, she claimed her son mimed and typed detailed descriptions of the gruesome abuse,” (Rosenberg). Aforementioned, little Jude is helpless to the attacks made by his own father and many other adults. Jude understands what his father is doing is extremely unacceptable, but he may not understand why his father is doing it. Therefore, the euthanization of Jude was necessary for his own mental health and safety. The practice of euthanization on humans is certainly moral and with good intent, benefits the afflicted person by putting them to peace from their unstable mental or physical

Open Document