Why Torture Is Wrong: Everywhere Summary

380 Words1 Page

In Bob Bercher's writing, "Why Torture is Wrong: Always; Everywhere", Bercher argues that there is never a valid situation in which torture should be applied.
Bercher's writing goes back to the core idea of "They Say, I Say". He starts the main paper by referencing and describing Dershowitz's argument of torture being acceptable if it is the only option left. According to Bercher, this argument is void as there is no such "Ticking Bomb" scenario where torture as we know it would apply. Most torture is not done "in the heat of the moment" and usually lasts several weeks or months, which means that the ticking bomb either takes months to tick or simply does not exist. Bercher believes that the legalization of torture through warrants would simply

Show More
Related

  • Puck and Natty

    716 Words  | 2 Pages

    meanings of his words. Jenkins puts things in a different context rather than the traditional "I

    Read More

  • Michael Levin's Essay: The Case For Torture

    948 Words  | 2 Pages

    Who wouldn’t have agreed? Yes, torture is cruel but it is less cruel than the substitute in many positions. Killing Hitler wouldn’t have revived his millions of victims nor would it have ended war. But torture in this predicament is planned to bring no one back but to keep faultless people from being sent off. Of course mass murdering is far more barbaric than torture. The most influential argument against using torture as a penalty or to get an acknowledgment is that such practices ignore the rights of the particulars. Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture” discusses both sides of being with and being against torture. This essay gets readers thinking a lot about the scenarios Levin mentioned that torture is justified. Though using pathos, he doesn’t achieve the argument as well as he should because of the absence of good judgment and reasoning. In addition to emotional appeal, the author tries to make you think twice about your take on

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Alan Dershowitz 'Should The Ticking Bomb Terrorist Be Tortured'

    1238 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rather, when torture is acceptable, and on which term should be it performed? The argument lest authorization torture his an advisor Sharde presumption that torture is currently happening and will be happening in the future hence the the. Plan of torture and. Dershowitz believes in a formal, visible, accountable, and controlled system of inflicting that would ideally leave torture as a last resort. The system would begin by granting the suspect immunity. Then suspect the be would compelled to testify; if the suspect were to refuse to exchange information, the next step would be acknowledging the possibility of torture while continuing to give the option of immunity. In a case of a suspect refusing to exchange information, even with immunity, a judicial warrant must be granted to proceed with purposely elicited

    Read More

  • Character Analysis: Wonder Children

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    Firstly, in the passage “Wonder Children” The author Carolyn Meyer starts out the introduction paragraph by

    Read More

  • We Make The Road By Walking

    1080 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the beginning, Horton and Freire discuss the format of the book and how they will proceed with their dialogue. They introduce the setting and talk about their perspectives on book writing. This introduction is essential in order for the reader to understand what follows, since this format is not common. The authors do not outline specific sections of the book at the beginning; rather they let the conversation flow in an order that seems natural at that time. Although I feel that the structure of the book seems very confusing to me when I try to recall who was saying what and projects a set clear lack of structure.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Michael Levin´s Article The Case of Torture

    856 Words  | 2 Pages

    closing statement, I feel that eventually, the case for torture is an exercise that is acceptable

    Read More

  • Why Torture is Morally Wrong

    2139 Words  | 5 Pages

    Consider the following situation: You are an army officer who has just captured an enemy soldier who knows where a secret time bomb has been planted. Unless defused, the bomb will explode, killing thousands of people. Would it be morally permissible to torture them to get him to reveal the bomb’s location? Discuss this problem in light of both Utilitarian and Kantian moral theories and present arguments from both moral perspectives for why torture is morally wrong.

    Read More

  • Is Torture Ever Acceptable?

    867 Words  | 2 Pages

    On the opposite side, there are people very much in favor of the use of torture. To them, torture is a “morally defensible” interrogation method (8). The most widely used reason for torture is when many lives are in imminent danger. This means that any forms of causing harm are acceptable. This may seem reasonable, as you sacrifice one life to save way more, but it’s demoralizing. The arguments that justify torture usually are way too extreme to happen in the real world. The golden rule also plays a big rol...

    Read More

  • The Structure Of Torture Analysis

    82 Words  | 1 Pages

    Hence, Beli and Oscar both experience physical torture in the cane fields. Elaine Scarry's "The Structure of Torture" describes how the act of torture effects an individual. Both Beli and Oscar experience varying effects of torture, which both reinforces and subtracts from the claims made Scarry's excerpt. To put it briefly, Beli and Oscar's deaths are in one way or another caused by torture; and in a broader sense; caused by love. As Marcel Proust once said: "love is a reciprocal

    Read More

  • Is Torture Justified?: Is Torture Justified?

    1042 Words  | 3 Pages

    The issue of torture is nothing new. It was done in the past and it’s done now in the 21st century. Without saying one side is right and the other side is wrong, let us discuss the part that we agree on and find common ground. We as Americans want to protect Americans from harms. So how do we prevent that from happening without torturing? It is impossible to get answer without some sort of questioning and intimidation techniques, since we know captured prisoners during war are not easily going to give up information. We know the enemy we face doesn’t follow the Geneva Convention or any law that pertains to war, so does that mean we shouldn’t also follow the Geneva Convention also, which prohibits torture? Of course not, because we want to be example for the world. Republicans argue that we have to do whatever is necessary to keep Americans safe, and Democrats argue it goes against our values and makes us look bad. We as Americans, as leader of the free world we

    Read More

  • Torture: Why It Should Stop

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    Torture, the most extreme form of human violence, resulting in both physical and psychological consequences. A technique of interrogation that has been proven time and time again to not only be ineffective but also a waste of time. Studies have shown that not only does torture psychologically damage the mind of the victim, but also can hurt the inflictor. If there is proof that torture is useless, why do we still use it? Torture should not be used to get information out of prisoners because of the risk of false information, enemy resistance and utter uselessness.

    Read More

  • Torture: A Controversial Issue

    665 Words  | 2 Pages

    Torture is the act of inflicting severe physical or psychological pain, and/or injury to a person (or animal) usually to one who is physically restrained and is unable to defend against what is being done to them. It has ancient origins and still continues today. The torture debate is a controversial subject to modern society. Because it is such a complex subject, many debatable issues come from it. For example, many have debated whether torture is effective in obtaining the truth, affects the torturers, threatens the international standing of the United States, or undermines justice. Others include what qualifies as torture, or whether or not the United States should set an example by not torturing. The two opposing claims to this topic would be: (a) that torture should always be illegal because it is immoral and cruel and goes against the international treaties signed by the U.S. and torture and inhuman treatment, and (b) yes, torture is acceptable when needed. Why not do to terrorists what they are so good at doing to so many others?

    Read More

  • Torture Persuasive Essay

    1189 Words  | 3 Pages

    and it quite possibly be a reality. Therefore the idea of torture as being illegal is redirected with loopholes and terms defined.

    Read More

  • The Convention Against Torture

    1107 Words  | 3 Pages

    Around the world and around the clock, human rights violations seem to never cease. In particular, torture violations are still rampant all over the world. One regime, the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, establishes a strong elaboration of norms against torture. Despite its efforts, many countries still outright reject its policies against torture while other countries openly accept them, but surreptitiously still violate them. The US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia all have failed to end torture despite accepting the provisions of the Convention.

    Read More

  • Edward Said's Orientalism

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    This idea is shown through Cromer's words as well. Two quotes perfectly show what Said is trying to get across to the reader. Cromer states:

    Read More

More about Why Torture Is Wrong: Everywhere Summary

Open Document