Why The Nez Perce War Was Not Justified

605 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Two viewpoints of american expansionism

Before the arriving of the Europeans, the native people used plants, animals and other resources carefully so that their children and grandchildren would be able to use them as well Caring for these resources was a way of respecting the land and what they had to offer as gifts”(washingtonhistory.com). Don't you think it was very nice living the NA had, yes. But when all the US settlers came in, they ruined the one good thing.No, the US was not justified in their actions leading up to, and during the Nez Perce war. Firstly , one reason the US was not justified in their actions leading up to and during the. Nez Perce War is that we all are equal, according to Martin Luther King Jr found on the website called goodreads.com “We hold these truths to be self evident, all men are created equal”. No one is better than another, they had no right to take control over them and tell them how to live their life, they are equal. …show more content…

On the website called wisdompills.com said by Massasoit "What is this you call property? It cannot be the earth, for the land is our mother, nourishing all her children, beasts, birds, fish and all men. The woods, the streams, everything on it belongs to everybody and is for the use of all. How can one man say it belongs only to him?”. Not only did the white men have no right for them to take mother earth's land but as said in the first paragraph, they are equal, therefore it’s everyone’s

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Daniel Richter's 'Facing East From Indian Country'

    1405 Words  | 3 Pages

    All over the country Native Americans would use this practice to prepare their fields for planting or create areas for the local wildlife. Taylor succeeds in his message of reorienting his readers view. Contrary to common belief Native Americans suffered more from European diseases and affected their local environments with fires.

    Read More

  • How Lewis and Clark Successfully Helped Native Americans

    696 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...re edible, and the best places to hunt. Who better to ask than the Native Americans, after all they were the natives of the land. One of the many examples of the Native Americans helping Lewis and Clark was they provided them with the horses that they would use to travel. The Tillmahaks had helped Lewis and Clark retrieve blubber from a whale that had washed up on the beach.

    Read More

  • How Did The Us Go To War With Mexico Dbq

    1048 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States were unjustified in going

    Read More

  • The Hornsby Shire and The Aboriginal People

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout time the local tribe built and developed a home for themselves and by 1975 crops were developed. The constant issue to survive from passing diseased became in issue.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast American History Vs Movie Avatar

    652 Words  | 2 Pages

    However the amount of time and kindness spent trying to take over the land was extremely different. In Avatar once they had all of the intel on the Na'vi people they made little attempt to safely relocate them. Instead naval forces attacked and didn’t care about the natives’ well being. In the events in our American history however we made multiple attempts to try and talk the people out of their homes before taking them by

    Read More

  • How Did The Environment Affect The Native American Indians With Particular Reference To The Woodlan

    1295 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Indians thought of land very differently to the white man. The land was sacred, there was no ownership, and it was created by the great spirit. They could not sell their land to others, whereas the white people could fence off the land which belonged to them, and sell it freely to whoever they wanted. The Europeans didn't think that the Indians were using the land properly, so in their eyes, they were doing a good favour to the earth. To the Indians, the land was more valuable than the money that the white man had brought with him, even though it didn't belong to them.

    Read More

  • Taking a Look at the Sioux Uprising

    824 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Dakota Nation didn’t just wake up one day and decide to attack the settlers. They had been insulted, oppressed and cheated for years. Eventually, the Sioux decided to stand up and take back their land. The Sioux were hunters, not farmers. When the US decided to buy the Sioux’s hunting grounds and give them farmland, they should have thought about the consequences. The Sioux missed their sacred hunting land and struggled to make their farmland prosperous. Not only that, but the Sioux believe that they belong in Minnesota. Some say Israel is the land of the Jews. Well, Minnesota is the land of the Sioux. Of course, the US didn’t exactly steal the Sioux’s hunting land. Technically, the US bought the Sioux out, however that would imply that the Sioux had a choice about selling or were even aware of what was taking place.

    Read More

  • Intertidal Wetlands Essay

    2699 Words  | 6 Pages

    The traditional owners of the land maintained the environment by using only what they needed, there was no waste left behind, they respected and new the values of the environment and they didn’t modify or harm their natural resources. They were nomadic, meaning they moved around so they didn’t use all of the resources. For example they fish in one area and then move on. If it was trout season they would take more, however if it wasn’t then they wouldn’t take any as it would disrupt the ecosystem.

    Read More

  • Role Of African Americans In Reconstruction

    1474 Words  | 3 Pages

    First of all, they would not agree with the ownership of land section, as Native Americans believed that land could not belong to individuals in the first place. The African Americans in the Declaration of Wrongs and Rights also say “as natives of American soil” when in reality, the true natives of the land were the Native Americans. Also, the document continues to talk about how African Americans claim the right to remain in said lands. Native Americans were moved from their native lands several times. The Homestead Act in 1862 could be seen as an example, new settlers were encouraged to take “free soil” but at the same time move over Native American settlers. Another example of this can be seen with the Osage who already lived on a reserve, they had already been removed and deported. Railroad companies wanted to use their land and were willing to pay for it. Then another railroad company saw the same opportunity and tried to convince them to move. The Osage refused to move and then the government intervened with the 1870’s removal law, which moved the Osage and sold their land for 1.25 dollars an acre. Eventually the situation got better for the Osage since there was oil in their new lands. Another example of this would be the concentration attempts of the Lakota. It nevertheless made sense to the authors since African

    Read More

  • Conflict Between Andrew Jackson And The Cherokee

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    To own land, that is the privilege of whom? To Andrew Jackson the Cherokees current homesteads where on his country’s land. For whatever reason at that time some people living in America weren’t treated as good as there white counterparts. Meanwhile the Cherokees principal chief John Ross felt like that land belonged to his people. If you want to get technical he was speaking on the behalf of a tribe that made up a mere one-eighth of his ancestry. Not exactly a full blooded leader. He also was one of the main reason the “trail of tears” was as hostile and brutal as it was on his people. Its ironic, even as hard as Jackson pushed and deceived the Cherokee, the Cherokee people in turn pushed back, but past the point of being rational.

    Read More

  • Submergence and Exclusion of Native Americans by the Spaniards and the Puritans

    2520 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Native Americans began to supplement and replace their own tools and other objects by the Europeans . However, this process reflected "merely a substitution not an alteration of their basic culture pattern" (Utley, 38). Life for the Indians remained essentially the same. There were "no changes in settlement patterns, warfare practices, means of subsistence, social or ceremonial activities" (Weber, 241).

    Read More

  • Native Americans

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    Towards the development of the United States of America there has always been a question of the placement of the Native Americans in society. Throughout time, the Natives have been treated differently like an individual nation granted free by the U.S. as equal U.S. citizens, yet not treated as equal. In 1783 when the U.S. gained their independence from Great Britain not only did they gain land from the Appalachian Mountains but conflict over the Indian policy and what their choice was to do with them and their land was in effect. All the way from the first presidents of the U.S. to later in the late 19th century the treatment of the Natives has always been changing. The Native Americans have always been treated like different beings, or savages, and have always been tricked to signing false treaties accompanying the loss of their homes and even death happened amongst tribes. In the period of the late 19th century, The U.S. government was becoming more and more unbeatable making the Natives move by force and sign false treaties. This did not account for the seizing of land the government imposed at any given time (Boxer 2009).

    Read More

  • Cultural Impact between Native Americans and Europeans

    599 Words  | 2 Pages

    Europeans emerged from a technologically advanced society, on the other hand, Native American people lacked innovative technology and relied solely on what nature provided. As these two drastically different cultures collided each other’s way of life was forever altered. Life changed from the ground up through the exchange of animals, seeds, and even microorganisms. As these two vastly different cultures collided their interactions sculpted future events that led to one nation’s industrialization and another’s reduction; furthermore, Present day life in America was shaped by this collision. Before the European and Native American worlds collided, Native Americas had not encountered horses, cattle, and swine. These animals were introduced to them through the European explorer, Christopher Columbus. Cattle and pigs were readily employed by the Native Americans as food; however, the arrival of the horse revolutionized Native American life, permitting tribes to hunt the buffalo much more effectively. The horse not only permitted improvements for hunting, but it also made Native American’...

    Read More

  • Native American Medicine Essay

    1125 Words  | 3 Pages

    Native Americans have a long history of using native plants, berries, herbs, and trees for a wide variety of medicinal purposes. Native Americans have been using these methods for thousands of years.

    Read More

  • Negative Effects Of War Essay

    850 Words  | 2 Pages

    War has been around for centuries. From the time modern civilizations began, war has played an integral part in human history. It shaped the world into the modern world we live in. War has been said to be a great motivator, for example, the Great Wall of China was built to fend off the attackers from the north. However, the negative aspects of war far outweighs any positive effects it might have. The destruction of civilizations, cities and countries, mass killings of men, woman and children alike, the disastrous effect it has on economy and the after effects of war can last for centuries.

    Read More

More about Why The Nez Perce War Was Not Justified

Open Document