Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
John steinbeck and women
John steinbeck and women
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: John steinbeck and women
Marcus Blystone Mr Hunter Chaffee Academic English 11 05/11/17 The History of Banning Of Mice and Men The American and literary classic Of Mice and Men isn’t so perfect as it's made out to be. The book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck has a history of being banned in many schools because it contains profanity, racial slurs, euthanasia, the use of the lord's name in vain and the rude treatment and portrayal of women. Parents and concerned adults called schools to complain and many schools replied with “ We can give them an alternate assignment”, when they could've just taken the book out of the curriculum. Instead of providing the students with a book that was morally right and contained no profanity, they instead gave the exact opposite. Let’s go in depth on the banning of the book. …show more content…
This shows through in the book during chapter two when George says , “ "'Ain't many guys travel around together,' he mused. 'I don't know why. Maybe ever'body in the whole damn world is scared of each other.’ (Steinbeck 35) Many parents believed that the amount of profanity was too much and caused an uproar when teachers had the audacity to ask students to read parts containing profanity from their desk to the class. Most of times, a swear word was combined with the term God, which was unacceptable to many people. Such as in chapter 4 when Crooks is talking to George and says “every damn one of ‘em’s got a piece of land in his hand. An’ never a God damn one of ‘em ever gets it.”( Steinbeck
The novel has foul language. There are many swears words in the book. In the very first chapter the character V uses very offensive language. She is in the car on the way home from the airport and the narrator, Mara notices her hand. “I stole a peek at her hand. Down each finger, from her pinkie to her pointer, she'd scrawled f***, f***, f***, f***. On her thumb it said everyone. Yikes” (Mackler 9). Seeing this in the ...
The decision to ban the novel Huckleberry Finn from classrooms and libraries has been an ongoing controversy. The presence of the 'n word' and the treatment towards Jim, and other blacks in general, has made many readers uncomfortable. Despite this fact, Huckleberry Finn has been and remains a classic read. I do not believe the novel should be banned or sanitized because it is a part of American history whether it is good or bad, also we have no right to change someone's writing simply because we do not like how it is written, Mark Twain's writing should not be penalized because of the ideals of today.
Granted, it does not add much, in terms of meaning, to the sentence, nor does it make the sentence more interesting, aside from getting a chuckle from the reader every so often. In that respect, I can see why Salinger made his character like this, but I can also understand why people would be offended by Holden’s language. Perhaps another option is to partially censor the book. Release a “PG version” that would omit the uses of “G.D.” but leave uses of milder curse words like “Hell” or “damn”. This way, if people are choosing not to read the book because of course, offensive language, then this version may be more approachable to them than the original version.... ...
A Comparison of John Steinbeck's novel Of Mice and Men and the 1939 Film Version of the Novel
With the thought that someone can be hurt by reading a book, people will try to challenge and ban them. To ban a book is to have it restricted from a certain age or audience. Banning and challenging books is trying to keep a certain book away from an audience due to sexual content, going against religious beliefs, language and vulgarity, violence, drugs, self-harm, racism, occult/satanic views, promoting gangs, and going against community standards. An argument from someone who believes books should not be banned is that it is important for the age group to learn about certain content and material as they grow up. Due to controversial content, the novel The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald should be banned.
The novel, The Catcher In the Rye, should not be banned from inclusion in the literature courses taught at the high school level. Banning this novel contradicts an individual's inalienable rights as an United States citizen. It limits freedom of speech and as well as other forms of expression. Although controversial, profanity is not a reason to limit an individual's rights. America is founded on principles that are not fueled by exceptions. Profanity is not an exception to freedom of speech. The Catcher in the Rye should not be excluded from curriculums at the high school level.
Lisca, Peter. "Of Mice and Men." The Wide World of John Steinbeck. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1958. 130-143. Rpt. in Children's Literature Review. Ed. Jelena Krstovic. Vol. 172. Detroit: Gale, 2012. Literature Resources from Gale. Web. 13 Jan. 2014.
"Book Banning." Current Issues: Macmillian Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 31 Jan. 2011.
content of the book, the school board voted 5-4 to ban the book. The book was later reinstated in the curriculum when the board learned that
Books are banned for many reasons but more times than not it is because of the sensitive information found within the novel that agitates the reader. As long as people have been able to develop their own opinions, others have sought to prevent them from sharing. At some point in time, every idea has ultimately become objectionable to someone. The most frequently challenged and most visible targets of such objection are the very books found in classrooms and public libraries. These controversial novels teach lessons that sometimes can be very sensitive to some but there is much more to challenged books than a controversial topic. What lies within these pages is a wealth of knowledge, such as new perspectives for readers, twisting plots, and expressions that are found nowhere else. For example, To Kill A Mockingbird, contains references to rape, racial content, and profanity that have caused many to challenge the novel in the first place. The book was banned from countless
Scarseth, Thomas. "A Teachable Good Book: Of Mice and Men." Censored Books: Critical Viewpoints. Ed. Nicholas J. Karolides, Lee Burress, and John M. Kean. Scarecrow Press, 1993. 388-394. Rpt. in Novels for Students. Ed. Diane Telgen. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale, 1998. Literature Resources from Gale. Web. 11 Jan. 2012.
Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe. The Houston Chronicle, pp.C14. Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database.
Although Of Mice and Men is a literary classic, it is also a frequently banned book in many schools and libraries in the United States already. One of the main reasons being the use of euthanasia. Specifically, when George kills Lennie, his best friend. The practice is already illegal in most countries, and to portray it on a book for people to read is just unacceptable. However, the vulgarity used in the book should not be overlooked.
Although the words “damn” and “hell” are used infrequently throughout the novel, they are not used enough times for the book to be challenged or banned. Karen Hirsch states, “[t]he language the characters use is authentic to the setting and to the characters that Paterson creates” (Hirsch 103). It was a necessity that Paterson had that type of language in the novel because that is how she envisioned it in her mind. Jess, the protagonist, and his dad use the “inappropriate words” infrequently throughout the novel because that is how people talked in that area at the time. These words are merely used; however, many people take them offensive in a child’s book, so it is understandable for people to attempt to challenge it.
To be more specific, the use of language through discriminatory slurs. Have it be that these slurs be discriminatory to race, religion or sex. However, as much as the use of this language may seem inappropriate today, this was the norm back then. Steinbeck did not use this type of language to discriminate anyone, in particular. He uses the language to show what it was thought of others during this time period.