Why Slavery Should Be Abolished

901 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Samex argumentative analysis

Similar to any hotly debated topic, slavery was surrounded with many different view points. Many students are led to believe there were only two sides to the slavery debate: those who wanted slavery and those who did not. In general, this was correct. There were actually sub groups of people within these two sides. Different theorists had different ideas about why slavery needed to be upheld or why slavery needed to be abolished. These arguments persisted throughout the United States until they eventual led to the Civil War. The anti-slavery movement consisted of men and women known as abolitionists. Abolitionists believed slavery needed to be eliminated. Many of the anti-slavery arguments had religious roots stemming from the Quakers. Abolitionists viewed the enslavement of another human as a sin and a direct violation of the golden rule. Despite common view points on why slavery should be abolished, the idea of how slavery should be abolished did vary from person to person. William Lloyd Garrison promote immediate abolition. In his his newspaper, The Liberator, Garrison had strong words regarding slavery. “IMMEDIATE EMANCIPATION can alone save her [the United States] from the vengeance of Heaven, and cancel the debt of ages!” (149) The previous quote came from an article Garrison wrote in his newspaper. Garrison was one the more extreme abolitionists and his views were not always shared by other abolitionists. Some abolitionists leaned towards gradual abolition. Gradual abolitions believed that current slaves would stay slaves but there would be no new slaves. Any children born to slaves would be free. Gradual abolitionists believed that former slaves would be unable to function in society due to their lack of education. With... ... middle of paper ... ...redd Scott was a slave who sued for his freedom because he had lived in a free state with his master. When the case made it to the Supreme Court they decided that Scott had no right to sue because he was from Missouri where slaves were not considered citizens (203). This was the right legal decision but was based on a bad law. The decision led to the fourteenth amendment of the United States which stated that all men and women born in the United States are citizens of the United States. The slavery arguments of the 1840s led to uneasy compromises that eventual led to an inevitable war. The numerous arguments surrounding slavery gave way to a war of epic proportions for the United States. Both sides had their own reasons and justifications, always believing they were right. Different laws were made to prevent the war but only prolonged the inevitable Civil War.

Show More
Related

  • Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Study

    951 Words  | 2 Pages

    Was Dred Scott a free man or a slave? The Dred Scott v. Sandford case is about a slave named Dred Scott from Missouri who sued for his freedom. His owner, John Emerson, had taken Scott along with him to Illinois which was one of the states that prohibited slavery. Scott’s owner later passed away after returning back to Missouri. After suits and counter suits the case eventually made it to the Supreme Court with a 7-2 decision. Chief Justice Taney spoke for the majority, when saying that Dred Scott could not sue because he was not a citizen, also that congress did not have the constitutional power to abolish slavery, and that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional. The case is very important, because it had a lot

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between Abraham Lincoln And James Oakes

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    At the same time in history, the Dred Scott case was taking place. This case was to determine what should be deemed appropriate for the rights of slaves. This case in particular infuriated Lincoln more than anything else did in his career. The ruling in this case was a legal way to insure that anyone that was enslaved was not only unable to become freed, but also that they were unable to be acknowledges as citizens in the United States at

    Read More

  • William Lloyd Garrison's Liberator & Frederick Douglass' North Star

    2617 Words  | 6 Pages

    The abolitionist movement reached its peak between 1830 and 1860. During this period, abolitionists, those who "insisted slavery undermined the freedom, righteousness, order, and prosperity of all society" (McInerney, 8) sought to identify, denounce and abolish this cruel institution using their rights of free speech and free press. With free press and free speech "abolitionists depicted slavery as raw, aggressive power carrying in it's wake the seeds of political, social, economic, and moral dislocation" (McInerney, 18). In other words, the evils of slavery were expressed by abolitionists in an attempt to convince American society that slavery was not only morally wrong, but it also went against the goal of the republic, which was liberty and equality for all. Two prominent abolitionists during this period who utilized the right of free press were William Lloyd Garrison with the Liberator and Frederick Douglass with the North Star. When examining Garrison and Douglass it is apparent that they had different approaches to writing against slavery because of their separate background. However, these differences can also be attributed to the fact that their writing audiences, inspirations and motivations for publishing their respective papers were distinct. Garrison and Douglass also had different but very influential effects on the Abolitionist Movement. These do not make Garrison and Douglass opponents; instead they demonstrate how white and black abolitionists had different approaches, methods, and styles of conveying their common message of abolishing slavery.

    Read More

  • Elijah Lovejoy

    1619 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Dred Scott decision involved two slaves, Dred Scott and his wife, who originated from one of the recognized slave states, Missouri, but they were relocated to settle in Wisconsin, a state where slavery was prohibited. In 1846, Scott filed a lawsuit and “sued for his freedom on the grounds that his residence in a free state and a free territory had made him free.” In 1854, Scott’s “case ultimately went to the Supreme Court.” By landing in the Supreme Court, the justices ruled seven to two against the Dred Scott and his wife for multiple reasons. One main reason that the court specified was that whether African Americans are enslaved or not, they were never recognized as citizens of the United States. Therefore, the justices believed that the case should not have been heard or discussed in the Supreme Court to begin with. The second reason was that regardless of any African American being transferred to a free state, does not necessarily change their social status. Thirdly, the Supreme Court ruled that the Missouri Compromise of 1820, a compromise that outlawed slavery north of the 36˚30’ latitude line, is unconstitutional because the Congress declared that they had “no power to ban slavery from any territory.” The decision was critical due to increasing the North population’s unease, and their concern that the South will begin to transport slaves to freed states, which will

    Read More

  • Civil War DBQ Essay

    624 Words  | 2 Pages

    Until today, many people still discuss about the main reason of the Civil War. It is definitely the war is about slavery. The more they discuss the more they see how horrible people can be to each others. Slavery was the reason to start the war. Hopefully, people learn from this and will never make the same mistakes from the past

    Read More

  • Essay On The Causes Of The Civil War Dbq

    848 Words  | 2 Pages

    The American Civil War was caused because of the North and South differences in economies, disagreements about abolishing slavery and whether the state or federal government had more power. These three factors played a key role in America's deadliest war. Understanding the causes of the Civil War is important because the war was one of the most important events in our nation's history. After the Civil War all men were truly created equal, it reunited the country as one, and redefined what it meant to be an

    Read More

  • Events that Led to the Civil War

    1792 Words  | 4 Pages

    The existence of slavery was the central element of the conflict of the north and south. Other problems existed that led to this succession but none were as big as the slavery issue. The only way to avoid the war was to abolish slavery, but this was not able to be done because slavery is what kept the south running. When the south seceded it was said by Abraham Lincoln that “ a house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free.” Because slavery formed two opposing societies and slavery could never be abolished, the civil war was inevitable. These were all the reasons why the south seceded from the union, this succession was eminent and there was no plausible way to avoid it.

    Read More

  • What Is The Significance Of The Harpers Ferry Raid

    1027 Words  | 3 Pages

    Abolitionism quickly gained popularity since 1821 when William Lloyd Garrison assisted in writing an anti-slavery newspaper, The Genius of Universal Emancipation, with Benjamin Lundy. In 1831, abolitionism continued to grow in popularity when William Lloyd Garrison started The Liberator. Although there remained not a need for slaves in the North, slavery remained very big in the South for growing “cash crops.” The majority of the abolitionists who inhabited the North organized speeches, meetings, and newspapers to spread their cause. Initially, only small revolts and fights occurred.

    Read More

  • 1800-1850

    975 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...wrote a Declaration of Sentiments, using points from the declaration of independence, which began: “All men and women are created equal.” Garrison’s position on women’s rights was the thing that finally split the antislavery ranks already divided by his growing radicalism. The schism of 1840 decreased the influence of abolitionism as a reform movement.

    Read More

  • The Supreme Court Case that Fueled the Beginning of the Civil War

    719 Words  | 2 Pages

    Dred Scott was born as a slave in Virginia. As a young man he was taken to Missouri, where he was later sold to Dr. John Emerson. A military surgeon, Dr. John Emerson moved Scott a US Army Post in the free state of Illinois. Several years later Dr. Emerson moved once again, but this time to the Wisconsin Territory. As part of the massive Louisiana Purchase the Wisconsin Territory under the Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery. While in the Wisconsin Territory and also later in St. Louis the Emersons started to rent the Scotts out as servants. Under several state and federal laws this was an illegal act in direct violation of the Missouri Compromise, the Northwest Ordinance, and the Wisconsin Enabling Act. Scott bounced around from several military posts including one in Louisiana before ending up again in St. Louis, Missouri. After the death of Dr. Emerson, ownership of the Scotts reverted to his wife. Through out 1846 Scott tried several times to by the freedom for him and his family. After several failed attempts he resorted to the legal r...

    Read More

  • The Dred Scott Decision

    2548 Words  | 6 Pages

    questions arise: 1st.[sic] Was [Scott], together with his family, free in Missouri by reason of his stay in the territory of the United States hereinbefore mentioned? And 2d[sic], If they were not, is Scott himself free by reason of his removal to Rock Island, in the state of Illinois...?" Both of these questions led to an even greater and more central question: "Can a negro, whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights, and priveledges, and immunities, guarantied by that instrument to the citizen?" (i.e. does Scott, having been a slave, have the constitutional right to sue?)

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Irrepressible Conflict Between The North And South

    1061 Words  | 3 Pages

    The people of the North and South each believed fiercely in their cause, one for a free people the other for life servitude. Neither group, based on the documents presented were willing to budge regarding their beliefs. They North wanted to abolish slavery completely and the South could not understand why they had to give up their way of life because the concept was so ingrained in them as a people. The two completely different ideals could not co-exist peacefully and therefore the eventual climax of this issue, the war, was an inevitable

    Read More

  • The Road to the American Civil War

    1339 Words  | 3 Pages

    The majority of speculations regarding the causes of the American Civil War are in some relation to slavery. While slavery was a factor in the disagreements that led to the Civil War, it was not the solitary or primary cause. There were three other, larger causes that contributed more directly to the beginning of the secession of the southern states and, eventually, the start of the war. Those three causes included economic and social divergence amongst the North and South, state versus national rights, and the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dred Scott case. Each of these causes involved slavery in some way, but were not exclusively based upon slavery.

    Read More

  • The Abolitionists Movement

    879 Words  | 2 Pages

    It may appear that in today’s America, slavery is looked down upon, and we’ve developed a long way from the past. However, before and during the Abolitionists Movement there were strong arguments for both sides of the subject. ("Arguments and Justifications: The Abolition of Slavery Project.") The gradual dominance in anti-slavery would not have been possible if people had not risked their lives and social standings to fight for the racial, social, legal, and political liberation for slaves. William Lloyd Garrison, Frederick Douglass, and the Grimke sisters are all prime examples of people who challenged pro-slavery, and protested the idea that one race was superior to another. Although abolitionists fought for their beliefs during this movement in the 1830s up to the year 1870 for the immediate emancipation of slaves, the ending of racial prejudice and segregation would not be possible if not by the influence of those courageous people, and should continue to be reinforced in today’s society. ("Civil Rights Movement.")

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq

    923 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even when Dred Scott was moved to the free state of Illinois by his master, gained his freedom and had raised a family, his master still forced him to go back to Missouri to be a slave again. Rightfully feeling wronged by this, Scott sued his master and the case made it to the Supreme Court. Although Scott had been living in Illinois, the Court deemed that Scott and his family were just property, so they could be taken anywhere and still be slaves. The South loved this decision because now slavery couldn’t be banned in the territories. Meanwhile, the North condemned it because it meant that there were no truly free states.

    Read More

More about Why Slavery Should Be Abolished

Open Document