Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should women not be allowed in combat units
Conclusion of women in military service
Why women should be allowed to serve in combat roles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should women not be allowed in combat units
Women in Combat Roles: The Needs of the Military Should Come First
Should women be allowed in all combat roles in the military or should certain positions be closed off to them? Can they be fearless and brave if a situation calls for it? These questions has been a continuing debate for many years that has not yet reached an agreement. Recently, there has been a spotlight on this issue with many women wanting to prove they can equally perform well mentally and physically just as well as men. There are many factors we must consider, but the main reason lawmakers have not come to a consensus is because having women in combat roles could propose a risk to the unit as a whole. However, since women have never been allowed to be in combat roles,
…show more content…
This is due to the need of cohesion of the group, particularly in combat positions. In the past, these arguments have been used for preventing integration of race and sexual orientations into the military, but further studies have proven these thoughts to be false (Segal., Smith., Segal., & Canuso, 2016, pg.29). Historically, women have always been part of the war effort by serving in auxiliary roles on the battlegrounds to care for the soldiers by performing jobs such as nurses, water bearers, cookies, laundresses and saboteurs (Women in military service for America memorial. n.d.). However, unbeknownst to those around them, during the Revolutionary, Civil and Mexican Wars, many women disguised themselves as men to fight for the cause (Wood. n.d.). Deborah Samson Gannett from Massachusetts was one of the first known female soldiers in 1782 and was able to enlist by using the name of her deceased brother (Wood). Gannet was wounded twice and even cut a musket ball out of her thigh so nobody would find out she was a woman (Wood). Many other women fought alongside their husbands under the cover of being a male …show more content…
In fact, one study found “women often possessed superior communication skills which enhanced cooperation, and team spirit at the organizational level (Alderman. Pg.34) Another primary concern is the idea that women are unable to handle the mental strain of combat due to their nurturing and caring nature. One sergeant in the Army’s special forces asked, “They nurture kids, Will a woman return fire and kill a child insurgent fighter?” (Michaels). In response, women have already proven they care mentally tough for the job. For years, some women have found themselves in the line of fire in the Middle East and having women in combat positions may be an advantage for the military. These military women have been able to secure intelligence from speaking to Afghan women because they would not speak to the men (Michaels).
Other concerns include women having periods each month, which can easily be controlled or suppressed by taking hormonal contraceptives. Pregnancy is another issue, but the Navy Personnel Research and Development Center found the average pregnant women in the Navy lost one day a month of work compared to men who lose twice as many days for drug and alcohol rehabilitation (Michaels). Therefore, pregnancy should not be singled out when any physical ailment could stop a soldier from deploying (Michaels). Another worry for the change of policy is the possibly of women becoming
The military is trying to find new ways to recognize the fact that women now fight in the country’s wars. In 2011 the Military Leadership Diversity Commission recommended that the Department of Defense remove all combat restrictions on women. Although many jobs have been opened for women in the military, there is still 7.3 percent of jobs that are closed to them. On February 9, 2012, George Little announced that the Department of Defense would continue to reduce the restrictions that were put on women’s roles. The argument that “women are not physically fit for combat” is the most common and well-researched justification for their exclusion from fighting units. It has been proven if women go through proper training and necessary adaptations, they can complete the same physical tasks as any man. Though there seem to be many reasons from the exclusion of women in the military, the main ones have appeared to be that they do not have the strength to go through combat, would be a distraction to the men, and that they would interrupt male bonding and group
Women should be allowed in combat roles in the armed forces because they are just as capable as men. To begin, women such as Shaye Haver and Kristen Griest, graduates of the Fort Benning Ranger School, have shown that they can meet the same physical requirements as men. Nevertheless, these women still weren’t allowed to serve in combat positions despite the rigorous training they completed that involved grueling obstacles they had to complete all while carrying 100-pound gear. Does that make any sense to you? It didn’t to me and it certainly didn’t to women like Sgt. Patricia A. Bradford who said “If you have to be able to lift a certain amount of weight in order to do a certain job, then the weight is not going to know whether you’re male or female.” (Women at Arms: On the Ground.). In fact, in some instances women have proved to be even more
Men have always been looked upon as the leading sex. Looking back through history women have been the ones who take care of the home and children, while men are the ones who work and go to war. However in recent years there’s no doubt that women have become much more equal in the work force. Nevertheless men are still the ones who are forced to fight our wars when the time calls for it. Many think that women should be entirely equal to men having their choice to be drafted taken away but the fact is that they are physically at a disadvantage, too emotionally oriented, and the increase of female presence would have a more negative impact in the military in the way of social interactions.
The most recent debate questions a women’s engagement in combat. What distinguishes some positions as being acceptable while others are not? Who has the authority to approve exceptions, and what exceptions have been made? On May 13, 2011, a bill placed before the House of Representatives addressed the issues to “repeal the ground combat exclusion policy for female members” (HR 1928).
female recruits at that time. *The average woman available to be recruited is smaller, weighs less, and is physically weaker than the vast majority of male recruits. She is also much brighter, better educated(a high school graduate), scores higher on the aptitude tests and is much less likely to become a disciplinary problem*. As the military modernized and weapons grew more sophisticated, education and technical skills became important. This development opened up more military jobs for women, including some combat-related jobs. For example, women became Army transport helicopter pilots and were assigned to nuclear missile sites. The rapid increase in military technology as well as changes in the whole concep...
"Update: Women in the Military." Issues and Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 29 May 2007. Web.
There was a time when women were unable to enlist and thought of as one who maintains her home and keeps her husband happy. That has changed along with the growth of our nation. Women are now able to join the military as well as serving in jobs of combat. Our servicewomen have gone through plenty and fought for where they are within our military ranks. So why are they feeling punished for being a female in the military?
Women during wartime situations were so determined to participate in the defense of their country and their homes, they went from performing the traditional duties of cooking, sewing, fixing the weapons for the soldiers to serving as soldiers themselves along side the men. They hid fugitives and even became spies. During World War II and the Vietnam War, women were only allowed to serve as nurses because military leaders did not want to expose women other than nurses to the horrors of combat. Women were not given any form of training and were not permitted to carry weapons which would able them to defend themselves against the enemy. Decisions permitting the deployment of women especially enlisted women, to the combat area was the military habit of over-protection, based on the notion that the women would not be able to cope with the slightest inconvenience without loss of morale and efficiency. It was just this kind of thinking that was continually interjected into the decision-making process when it came to enlisted women, which were often treated as though they were not much brighter than a young child. “The male soldiers, sailors, airmen and hostile wives back home labeled these
While women may not have fought in the war, they were still exposed to the brutality of the war. “Women knew the presence of military always meant the possibility of rape or physical humiliation” (Berkin, 2005, 39). “Loneliness, poverty, fear of starvation and the possibility of rape and death at the hands of hostile invading troops” (Berkin, 2005, 52). Most of the women that made this choice were from lower rings of society. These women followed behind soldiers carrying baskets on their backs filled with supplies and carried children in their arms. Even in the cool air they
There are two main reasons for the lack of females involved in the higher ranks of the U.S. military. (1)- Women are not allowed to participate in combat, which is most often how a promotion is achieved. The reasoning behind this problem is feelings and beliefs about gender integration would harm how effective a combat unit would be. (2)- There is a much higher turnover rate with women than there is with their male colleagues. Women are not as likely to remain in service as long as men and are less likely to view the military as a permanent or long-term career which will affect their chances at a promotion. (Sagalyn, 2011).
Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men. The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done. Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations. It would be a great mistake to allow women in these stressful and dangerous situations.
The story of America’s military woman can be traced to the birth of our nation. During the American Revolutionary War, the 18th and 19th centuries, where women served informally as nurses, seamstresses, cooks, and even as spies and were subject to Army’s rules of Conduct. Though not in uniform, these women shared soldier’s hardships including inadequate housing and little compensation. Women have formally been part of the U.S Armed Forces since the Inception of the Army Nurse Corps in 1901. In 1973 the transition to the All-Volunteer Force marked a dramatic increase in the opportunities available for women to serve in the military. As of September 30, 2009, the total number of active duty women in the U.S was 203, 375, and women made up 14.3 percent of the U.s armed forces (Robinson). Women are a crucial role in c...
However, there is still a huge amount of inequality and safety risks that women experience when they decide to go this route. Women can join the military but there was a law passed in 1994 that bans women from all combat. There are women in the army now that are fighting for the right to join in combat. If a person makes the serious decision of joining any kind of army force than they should be able to get real fighting experience. Majority of men agree that women shouldn’t fight in combat, but what this way of thinking does is show that the oppressive subordinate mindset towards women is still alive and well even in the military.
Across the history, women Suffer from luck of their right. Culture and civilization was not respect women and put them in the lower layer in their social pyramid. Kill them were they alive, while other give them a life with a lot of misery and obstacle, which is the same thing or killing them better than these life . At the few previous centuries, the world growth and become more opening. people understanding that they are needing women in a lot of job outside their home as men. Sadly, when we came to combat sector, we stop thinking logically. It is men major one hundred percent . If we look to the book (1001 things everyone should know about women's history) which written by Constance Jones (2000) we can find that only 88013 women among history had the ability to take part in military by give a variety of services. Some country actually these day try to make it happen. For instance the first country was allowed women in military was Norway around 1985. Then, it followed by thirteen other countries. It still small percentage compared with the world. It is the right of women to join army and take part in combat, because they are capable as men in adapting with situation. Also, they have equally amount in cerebration and they have the right to decide their own destiny.
Should women be allowed in the military? My answer was at first a resounding “no.” However, once I started my research, my opinion changed. In 1948, Congress passed the combat exclusion law that prohibited women in the Air Force, Marines, and Navy to hold combat positions; however, the Army can assign these duties as they see fit (Schroeder). Some people assume that Americans are not ready to see a woman wounded or killed in war; however, there are female police officers that are wounded or killed daily (Schroeder). How can we rationalize that a woman has the right to die protecting our local communities but not our country? If a person chooses to be in a combat field, and can pass the physical demands required, gender should not be an issue. The arguments of physical differences and cohesion among the troops are valid arguments but not substantial enough to prevent women from serving in frontline combat roles within the military.