Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Obesity in america
The problem of obesity among the American population
Obesity in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Obesity in america
In America there are over hundreds of thousands of people that have some type of obesity caused by many things. The government does not like obesity in many ways, so they want to put regulations on what we eat. But here are reasons they should not put regulations on what people eat; the government can spend their funds elsewhere more important, people will smuggle unauthorized food, and finally people really would not change their eating habits.
The government can go spend their funds elsewhere more important because U.S. residents will be furious if the government puts regulations on food people like to eat. The government has more important things to worry about, like the fight for cancer or even feed starving families on the streets. If the government does put regulations and ban sugary foods and drinks, they will fine businesses $200 for violating the ban (Park). And plus most people are able to make their own decisions on what they eat to be healthy. It seems that the government likes to monitor what people eat instead of looking at the families that are starving. This supports
…show more content…
my claim that the government needs to go focus spending their funds on stuff that is more important than watching what other people eat. Moving on, if the ban goes through then somehow people will learn ways to smuggle unauthorized food, because the ban is most likely not going to keep people from getting 16oz or 20oz sugary drinks.
It would not make any sense to have food regulations, because honestly people could just easily get unauthorized food. Like instead of having underground casinos there will most likely be underground illegal restaurant; they will be serving fatty foods and sugary drinks, because of customer satisfaction. Yeah, obesity is a bad thing but still the government does not need to put regulations on what we eat, but to encourage us to eat healthy. So if the ban does go through people will find ways to get a hold of their favorite food. This supports my claim because the crime rate will rise and the police does not have time to be apprehending people for having food they like to
eat. Therefore, the government should really think about it and realize that it is very hard to have people change their eating habits. At a young age children start to develop eating habits and when they become adults people want to start telling them to eat healthy when they are already use to eating the way they have for years. So it would not be a good idea to tell them to eat healthy when they are adults, but it is a good idea to train them to eat healthy when they are young. In this visual it is showing a man overindulging ice-cream while fixed in front of a poster saying “I want YOU. . . to slim down” (pletcher) and the man is labeled U.S. obesity and he simply does not care. This visual supports my claim because it shows that are people do not like being told what to do; especially by the government. In conclusion, you know how in America there are simply hundreds of thousands of people that have obesity and it is caused by many things, but most of it is caused by simply bad eating habits. Now the government wants to put regulations on food and what people eat. A lot of people seem to disagree with the government, here are the reasons why; the government can spend their funds elsewhere more important, people will smuggle unauthorized food, and finally people really would not change their eating habits.
Radley Balko, The author of the essay “What You Eat is Your Business”, would agree that in order to stop obesity, we must turn this public problem around and make it everyone’s individual responsibility. Instead of inflicting the importance of personal ownership, government officials, politicians and congress make obesity a public problem by prohibiting junk food in school vending machines, federal funding for new bike trails and sidewalks, and restrictive food marketing to children. Overall I agree that this manipulation of food options is not the proper way to fight obesity, however, I think that government should inform people about the food they are eating because then they have no excuses for not taking responsibility of the actions.
After reading "The Toxic Truth About Sugar" and "Banning the Big Gulp", I am not entirely convinced that government intervention is necessary. Lustig, Schmidt and Brindis' article practically clarifies the the dangers of sugar itself, while Bittman's article passionately discusses the temporary cessation of the decision to ban/restrict the sale of over-proportioned drinks. Although, as Lustig and his colleagues pointed out, sugar has potential for addiction and other long term detriment to health and economy, the authors failed to acknowledge the fact that people can still watch what they eat. For example, a 1.9lb (862g) bag of Sour Patch Kids contains approximately 550 grams of sugar; 26g per single serving of 16 pieces (40g). Lustig and his
Obesity is a global medical issue where people are confused between eating and dieting. I am an Omani student, and back in Oman, it has the same issue as the United States does. Both society try to stop their people from having obesity. However, “What You Eat is Your Business” written by Radely Balko explains how government allow unhealthy food to spread out over the country, and in return the government tries to push people to focus on health care systems where people may not be able to do it. Beside on that, American people try to reduce their meals or eat just a few amount of food without differentiate between health and unhealthy food, and that is because they want to become healthier, which Mary Maxfield clarifies that on her article “Food
The New York soda ban would not prove to be effective because it is will bring about a rebellious reaction in some people, it does not include supermarkets, vending machine and convenience stores and refills which means people can go around it and educating people should be the first step towards improvement in their lifestyle.
Mohammed Almutairi ENGL1020 p:Willims May 20, 2014 The Government Should Stay out of the Fast Food Industry’s Business Practices The government believes that cigarette smoking is responsible for the increased lung cancer prevalence in the United States. In reaction to this belief, the government devised scrupulous ways to significantly reduce cigarette purchases. The first move the government made was to increase the cigarette tax by 1775%.
Canada allows citizens to have freedom to make their own decision, about what they want to eat. That’s why it is such a great country. Walking into a restaurant are usually adults or adults accompanying their children and the adult selects the meal. That’s been going on for decades so why change that now? Banning trans fats is messing up the idea that restaurant- goers decide what they put in themselves, they choose and make their own judgments, good or bad. And the fact that trans fats isn’t addictive says enough that it by no means should it be banned. The idea that the FDA, The Food and Drug Administration and the government haven’t b...
With the continued growth of fast food restaurants, low priced food, and fast friendly service, these restaurants have become very appealing to the average consumer. With this increase in popularity, there has come many problems for these companies associated with the fast food industry. These stores are being blamed for the rise of obesity and other health issues in America; leading to many wanting a ban or probation on these fast food restaurants. The Government has stepped in on this issue and is trying to coming up with solutions for this so called “epidemic”. “One ordinance has passed by the Los Angeles City Council that bans the issuance of permits relating to the construction of any new fast food restaurants in South Los Angeles, California to promote healthy eating choices” (Creighton, 2009, p. 249). This law stops fast food restaurants from building any new stores in South Los Angeles. This law tells people that the “government is better at making choices for people than the people are for themselves” (Creighton, 2009, p. 249). It is like the government is treating their citizens like children making decisions for them, because they do not know better. Fast food restaurants should not be blamed for the consumers’ health problems, because it is the consumers’ choice to eat there, and these restaurants are not as bad as anti-fast food activists make them out to be.
Some lawmakers argue that to limit what Americans are allowed to buy violates their rights. This is simply not true. The changes would only limit what could be bought within the government programs. If the participants of the SNAP program would like to buy foods deemed “unhealthy”, they are completely allowed to do so with their own personal income, just not with taxpayer dollars. The same goes for the NSLP program, if the individual wants to consume unhealthy foods, those foods can be bought outside of school and brought by the individual child.
The government must have a say in our diets. Because the issues of obesity have already reached national scales, because the costs of obesity and related health issues have gone far beyond reasonable limits, and because fighting nutritional issues is impossible without fighting poverty and other social issues, the government should control the range and the amount of available foods. The cost of healthier foods should decrease. The access to harmful foods should be limited. In this way, the government will be able to initiate a major shift in nutritional behaviors and attitudes in society.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), obesity now ranks as the 10th most important health problem in the world (“Obesity Seen as a Global Problem”). Childhood obesity has more than doubled in children and tripled in adolescents in the past 30 years. Centers for Disease Control and Protection estimates that obesity contributed to the deaths of 112,000 Americans in 2000 (“Obesity in the U.S. Fast”). It is estimated that annual medical care cost of obesity are as high as $147 billion (“Obesity in the U.S. Fast”). Government-provided food stamps are often expended on junk or fast food, because it tends to be less expensive than fresh or cook food. Governments fund producers of meat and dairy products to keep prices low. For now, governments are taking a smarter and more productive approach through regulation, and by working with manufacturers.
The government has tried and tried to take away our basic rights, hide stuff from us, and are now trying to ban junk food and fast food commercials? I think junk food commercials should not be banned because the government should not have the power the sensor what we watch. It is discrimination towards the companies that pay to put their product on television but no longer can because they are blamed for the nation’s problems. Finally it would take away jobs.
Processed food should be banned from school meals due to increasing health issues in children, increasing academic deficiency and increasing production cost to produce processed foods. There are people who would oppose to this idea due to population growth and an increasing food demand. However, this escalating demand of food is forcing the food industry and other government agencies to resolve the current hunger and lack of resources issues, by hiring processing factories and private companies to manufacture processed foods. The greater part of school age children consume processed foods on a daily basis.
Genetically modified foods most commonly refers to the plants, which has been modified in the laboratory to enhance improved nutritional content and aimed traits created for human beings and animals. With progress in various types of technology, especially in genetic engineering, farmers and scientists have changed the way in which food is grown and made, raising questions about the methods, their risks and possible effects. It is not a secret that GMF-ed foods have spread out rapidly to the whole world. GMFs have raised concerns over their own beneficial in that they are resistant to diseases, produces greater yields, and it improves the nutrition of foods making the people unaware about their effects. Every time we go to any grocery stores or supermarkets, we would not know whether the vegetables, fruits or even meats being sold are genetically modified. To make this situation worse, most consumers do not pay much attention to what they are eating, when they are actually consuming modified foods.
To survive in life we need to consume food whether it is for nutritional value or for the pure enjoyment of its savory taste. Individuals, not the government, have the right to choose what and when to eat; but good nutrition is important to maintain health and live a long and happy life. People need to make choices everyday about what they put into their bodies. Without proper nutrition, our bodies may not be able to function correctly. Most adults know what is good and bad for the body. We all know that diets rich in fruits and vegetables fuel the body in a healthy way and that protein gives us energy. Although we know what food is best for our bodies, each individual has a personal choice of what they put into their bodies and that should not be dictated by the government, even though
With the facts, statistics and examples I have provided, it is quite clear that obesity in America is not a major concern, as it should be. If some people weren't so obese there would be more food left over to donate to the starving in other countries, health insurance wouldn't have to be so costly, more active people in America, instead of being noticed as “lazy Americans”, and better health, allowing people to live longer to see their grandchildren grow. Obesity has major consequences on the health of many people, so we must stop the effects it has had on our society before it is too late.