Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ecological benefits of zoos
Views on animal captivity
Ecological benefits of zoos
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ecological benefits of zoos
It’s time for animals that are in captivity to end
What happens when animals are kept in captivity is it bad or not? A lot of animals are in captivity, also animals that are in captivity are taken care of but that doesn’t mean that they are all well taken care of, animals that are in captivity can be bad for them. Although animals in captivity are taken care of and kept from predators they should ban animals from being kept in captivity because the animals don’t have a big enough space to roam, small spaces cause not normal behavior, animals instincts can disappear.
The first reason why animals should not be kept in captivity is animals need room to roam. In zoos they don’t have a big enough area for the animals to roam in their enclosed habitats. Animals need room to climb, fly, swim, roam or run in zoos. If animals are out of captivity they have room to do all of these things unlike in zoos they don’t. According to the article Do Animals Lose in Zoos even with man made-made areas to fly, swim, climb, and explore, animals are still restricted to their behavior. Although animals look like they have room to roam they don’t because the habitats aren’t big enough.
…show more content…
When animals are in small spaces they basically go crazy because they don’t really have anywhere to go while in the wild they have tons of space to. Animals love having space to walk around just like us humans do put us in there place for instance we would freak out to if we were in as small of a place as they are in captivity. Animals should have this space this is why they should be in the wild because then they won’t have bad behavior. According to the article Do Animals Lose in Zoos when animals are in small spaces it causes not normal behavior. Although animals seem normal when you go to see them at a zoo they are not they just aren’t showing
I will now move onto arguments supporting the use of animal captivity. I am starting with Kant, who provides a strong argument for animal captivity. Kantian Ethics holds the view that we do not have any direct ethical duties to non-human animals. We only owe ethical duties to rational beings, and non-human animals are not included in this group. The value humanity comes from our capacity to be governed by autonomous, rational choices. Since non-human cannot be part of this, Kant believes we can do as we please with them. This can be demonstrated in Kant’s ‘Political Writings’ when he argues,
I will now provide arguments against the use of animal captivity. Firstly, I will use Peter Singer, who I believe delivers the strongest argument against animal captivity. Singer is a consequentialist who argues for animal rights and the position that animals should not be held captive. Singer reminds us that humans are animals but language makes us overlook this. As a utilitarian and hedonist, Singer looks towards the end result, where like human beings, other animals choose pleasure over suffering. Singer regards interests of consciousness rather than self-consciousness. Therefore since animals are conscious beings and animal captivity causes pain and suffering, it is wrong. Robert Garner
The truth can be a bit overwhelming, it is clear and simple, wild animals should not be held in captivity. With all this researching and finding the dirt on what really happens behind closed doors, it is hard to believe some people, who are aware of what really goes on, continue to support these programs. It is not morally correct to take advantage of a being, who is incapable of standing up for itself, for the pleasure of mankind. We have no right to do such a thing because we are all the same, under it all we are just another set of bones to lay to rest. If we would not hold our fellow humans captives and force them to entertain then why do we do it to animals? What if the roles were reversed and we were the defenseless ones? Say what you want, in the end keeping wild animals captive is wrong and needs to be stopped.
Overall, animal captivity has not been solved yet because of people wanting to keep and observe animals to “learn” about them. Also, because people don't realize how places like zoos and SeaWorld are cruel and not actually seeing that the animals captured are not happy where they are placed. However, it is a problem that needs to be solved right away for the benefit of the
Animals, particularly the larger ones, are unable to live comfortably in small enclosures. Zoos tend to forget that larger animals have the hardest times getting used to the spaces that they are forced to live in. According to James Nolan’s article, “All the Reasons Why Zoos Should Be Banned”, “…the average lion or tiger has 18,000 times less [space] in captivity than it does in the wild; polar bears a million times less [space]” (7). Although zoos try to recreate their natural habitats, they cannot possibly succeed. The animals, if not born at the zoo, lived in large areas and had all of the freedom that they
On the other hand, animals kept in captivity not only have research done about them but it can also have a positive effect on their population. Being kept in captivity helps conserve the populations of endangered species. In a captive environment they are kept safe and away from harm. They can breed in captivity and keep the population growing. SeaWorld has bred many Orca Whales in captivity and hasn’t taken any out of the ocean in 35 years (Raja).
It is said that in order to protect the wildlife, we need to be educated about the wildlife that inhabits our planet. As humans, and the superior species on Earth, we put exotic animals, aquatic and terrestrial, in zoos or aquariums where people can go to see them to learn more about them in order to protect them. It just so happens that by putting these animals into captivity, we are causing more damage to them, just as damage is occurring in the wild and more species are becoming extinct. Animals should not be held in captivity; it does not save them from going extinct, but helps kill them off.
Barbara J. King (2015) wrote, that it is estimated that between 3000 and 5000 healthy animals killed in captivity per year. These numbers are steadily rising by the day. This is absolutely unnecessary. The reasons these animals are dying are just idiotic. It is objectively wrong to kill healthy animals in captivity.
middle of paper ... ... Freedom is precious and animals are constantly suffering mentally and physically from the lack of freedom that captivity brings to them. Although many zoos are visited by millions of people annually, they still operate at a loss and have to make budget cuts. Funds that should be used to provide humane conditions for animals are often wasted on cosmetic improvements such as landscaping, refreshment stands, and gift shops in order to draw visitors, leaving the animals behind steel bars and glass trapped in a concrete jungle for no reason without hope of ever being free.
... danger too. A good reason for captivity is rehabilitation for an animal that is hurt or wounded and could be treated. Then having a second chance back out into the wild. Also by keeping endangered species from going completely instinct by figuring out genetics of an animal. So having zoos and farms do help animals but does put them at risk.
Even though some zoos have an endangered species exhibit with the intention of protecting and rehabilitating animals, many do not do an adequate job of protecting the animals. Zoos have been harmful to the very animals they have sworn to protect. Animals in captivity often suffer from anxiety, boredom and other severe issue related to prolonged confinement. Most animals are unable to thrive in small enclosure with unnatural weather and climates. For example elephants are known to walk as far as 30 miles per day, but the association of Zoos and aquariums only require a space the measures $0 feet by 45 feet, which is about the size of a three car garage, to house these large animals. (peta.org) the drastic difference in the amount of space their allowed ...
I believe that wild animals should not be kept in captivity. All around the world there are zoos that hold endangered species and wild animals. I do not believe we should have zoos and that we should shut down all of the zoos and release all of the wild animals that are held within them. It is unnatural and unlawful for wild animals to be kept in a zoo. Animals were born in the wild so why do we take them out of it to put them on display?
The world around us is changing fast. People want to know and ready to learn more about different things, such as animals. Many of us have ever been in zoos and had different experience and emotions are associated with this visit. Some may say that keeping animals in captivity is a crime, others would totally disagree with this statement. People are different and their points of view are different.
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared to their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers. Zoo animals are usually kept in very cramped enclosures and do not behave like their wild counterparts.
Zoo´s just make the animal´s worse because they only make them get into a smaller environment, Also, The animals don't get enough energy to be as active as they were in the wild. Animals aren't in the wild witch make them live a lot shorter because their environment is very small compared to their much bigger environment in the