Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The right to fairness in the criminal justice system
The criminal justice system reform essay
The criminal justice system reform essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The right to fairness in the criminal justice system
1. I think she believes her sister's punishment was unfair because she wasn't the person who committed the crime. She oberved what happened and what put in jail for seven years longer than her boyfriend, who was only sentenced to three years in prison. This is unfair because her husband was the one who committed the crime, not her. Stephanie's mother thinks Stephanie's punishment was unfair because her daughter waited in the car while her boyfriend went into a house to get drugs. This girl was sentenced for ten years in prison just because she didn't tell the cops anything. I agree with the mother and the sister that Stephanie's punishment was unfair because what she did was so little compared to what her boyfriend did. I understand why she got arrested, but I don't understand why she was …show more content…
All she did was not tell the cops anything, her boyfriend was the one that stole the drugs. I believe they should revaluate her case and change the amount of time she has to be in prison.
2. A time that I was punished harshly was when I wasn't getting my priorities straight. I sat down with my dad and we had a talk about if what I was doing was benefitting me for the long run. I was working every single day after school because I need to get paid to pay for my monthly truck fee. I have two jobs, one is working for Marylyn Johnson and the other is working at the Ackley Vet Center. I would work at Marylyn's three times a week and the vet three times a week. That would leave me Sunday to work with my cows. I also didn't leave that much time in my schedule to do my housework. I didn't think it was a big deal because I didn't have any shows coming up for awhile. However, it was a big deal for my parents. They yelled at me and told me I coudn't leave the house for the whole weekend. I also had to start doing my own laundry. I didn't understand my punishment because it's not like I was hanging out with friends
As we the jury were deliberating what would be the best punishment for the crime the defendant, we examined his record which the jury did not find anything to judge him by in a negative light. We have also heard testimony he has been involved in a conflict with a former inmate. We further learned it has not always been easy to make the defendant to comply with orders from the officials in the
My concern is what made the court decide that Alanza Thomas deserved to be tried as an adult with no past criminal record. I believe that the appropriate sentencing for Alanza would have been probation and detention because in this way, the courts can monitor the juvenile as well as make him “pay” for what he has done. I feel like the detention he should have received should have been juvenile where they provide intervention programs for problem children experiencing behavioral problems. At a detention home, the juvenile will at least spend their days receiving counseling, individual therapy, and learning how to with fellow peers and
As a child, I learned from my parents and teachers that if I did something wrong I would have to be punished. Back then, punishment to me was sitting in a corner until I “learned my lesson.” When I asked what would happen if adults were naughty, my teachers told me there was a place for them to go where they could kept so they couldn’t hurt anyone. Prison.
In July of 2008, one of the biggest crime cases devastated the United States nation-wide. The death of Caylee Anthony, a two year old baby, became the most popular topic in a brief amount of time. Caylee’s mother, Casey Anthony, became the main suspect after the child supposedly was kidnapped and went missing. To this day, the Casey Anthony case shocks me because justice, in my opinion, wasn’t served. I feel as if the criminal conviction system became somewhat corrupted in this case. The entire nation, including the court system, knew that Casey Anthony was behind this criminal act, but yet she escaped all charges. I chose this case not only because it’s debatable, but also to help state the obvious, this case was handled the wrong way. Clearly the legal system was biased, which worked in Casey Anthony’s favor, freeing a murderer.
When Deborah was only sixteen she became pregnant with her first child by Cheetah and boy she liked when she was younger. Cheetah and Deborah got married and then had their second child. Deborah became very unhappy in the marriage because Cheetah started drinking and doing drugs. He started abusing Deborah. Cheetah pushed Deborah so much she almost killed him if it wasn’t for Bobbette. Deborah’s brothers Sonny and Lawrence were doing well except for Joe. Joe was another case. Joe went to the military, and the family was hoping that would do him good; but he came out worse than when he went in. Joe was threatened and beaten up by a boy named Ivy. Joe was in so much rage he went and stabbed him and killed him. Joe eventually turned himself in to the law, was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced fifteen years in prison.
Juror #3 is very biased against the 19-year-old boy that is being tried, and this affects all of his thoughts and actions regarding the case. He has this bias because his own son hit him in the jaw and ran away from home at the age of 15: “I’ve got a kid…when he was fifteen he hit me in the face…I haven’t seen him in three years. Rotten kid! I hate tough kids! You work your heart out [but it’s no use] (21).”According to this quote from the text, this juror condemns all teenagers and feels resentment towards them. He especially feels strongly about the boy being tried, because the boy grew up in the slums, and this juror is also biased against these people who grew up there. It is because of these feelings that he is strongly cemented in his vote of guilty.
She based it on the First Amendment grounds, saying that she had the right to possess the materials. However, when the case reached the Supreme Court, her First Amendment claim was not addressed and instead threw out her conviction on other grounds, the Supreme Court stated that the evidence against her should have not been used because it was seized with a warrant and it’s in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the exclusionary rule.
Sentencing of a convicted criminal is ultimately in the hands of the judge. Although there are standards that may be suggested for a judge to follow that work in accordance with the crime committed, by no means is a judge required to follow those suggested standards when making a decision. In the end, the final verdict is left up to the judge presiding over the case and they can do with that how they feel fit. Which is why in the case of Rhonda Kuzak, the judge has decided to go a less conventional route with her punishment. Because of the previous convictions Kuzak has on her record, a simple fine and/or jail time will not be what the court ordered. Kuzak has been arrested and convicted three prior times for possession of drugs, cocaine to
... believed in the innocence of the young man and convinced the others to view the evidence and examine the true events that occurred. He struggled with the other jurors because he became the deviant one in the group, not willing to follow along with the rest. His reasoning and his need to examine things prevailed because one by one, the jurors started to see his perspective and they voted not guilty. Some jurors were not convinced, no matter how much evidence was there, especially Juror #3. His issues with his son affected his decision-making but in the end, he only examined the evidence and concluded that the young man was not guilty.
Most of her clients to poor to make bail. Even if they did not commit the crime, it made sense for them to say they did. They would get out of jail quicker if the pleaded guilty than if they fought their
... long. As it turned out, to her surprise, she was sentenced to 30 years in prison. A young lady with no criminal background was sentenced to three decades behind bars. But after the recent change in nonviolent drug charges, she had her sentence cut to 21 years, and she was released from prison. She has now returned home to her adult children. Nodd stated, “I didn’t need 20 years to learn my lesson. It would have taken me a month behind bars because it killed me to leave my kids.” Because of the old structured minimums that are set before our judges and juries, people like Nodd have to suffer unjust consequences.
I was a typical 6th grader with a love for social time and hatred towards pointless homework. As I was tapping my foot on my creaking wooden desk with my book opened pretending to read, Mr. Daniels was watching over me like a bird that just gave birth to chicken eggs. I had a feeling she was going to ask me a question about what I was reading. I realized from that point on to always trust my instincts. Mrs. Daniels tall toothpick shaped body leaned over and asked me to summarize the first chapter in front of the whole class. Due to not even beginning to read the first page I told her I did not even know where to begin. Since I was not prepared for class, not participating, and being rude about my task at hand I received a punishment. My punishment was every week I had to write a summary in my own words about the chapter I had read. My eyes rolled in the back of my head so far I didn't know if they would ever go back to normal. I knew my life was over at this
...rimes combined. Harsh sentencing are being given to drug possessions. It is a fact that first time offenders to non violent arrests of drugs receive a mandatory of 5 years without parole in prison and 10 depending the size of drugs involved.
...o our red van not saying a word to me. On the drive home she gave me my punishment. The punishment was that I was to be grounded for an entire month, and reap the consequences with the law. I ended up sitting in my house for the first month of summer and losing two-hundred and eighty dollars, which was my fine for stealing.
Childhood discipline is a very important task to do as a parent or parent figure. Childhood discipline needs to be done for these three reasons, to get your child to respect you and for you to respect your child, make your child understand what they did wrong, and make your child realize no matter how old they are you will still discipline them. Disciplining your child is fundamental to the parent-child dynamic. Discipline is about choices and consequences. When getting disciplined your children learn how to be honest, responsible, kind, and sharing people. While they follow the rules set in place by their parents, they have