Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Teaching and learning resources importance
College tuition impact on students
Negative effects of high college tuition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Teaching and learning resources importance
There may be times where you may wonder why some of the most capable students don’t go to college and I am here to tell you and show you what some of those reasons are. Lack of resources can affect anyone in any situation, from loans, career, job and education. Resources are needed for everything we do every day, if we go to work we need resources to get there and do our job and that is just how it is in college, you need resources to continue your education; money, technology, scholarships, transportation, books and programs. Without resources nothing can be done or started.
Problem:
To begin with, resources for a college education can be the biggest problem a student faces, many teenagers want to succeed in their life and continue with
…show more content…
We could use that money to make college more affordable by providing the students that lack on resources with more help or scholarships, making tuition and college fees cost less. According to the president Barack Obama who spoke directly to colleges in his State of the Union address: “If you can’t stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down” (Obama 2012). During this speech Obama brought attention to the colleges because they were increasing their tuition as much as possible and 75% of Americans said that college was too expensive. Obama wanted to make it clear because he wanted to make sure that families could send their kids to college, the colleges could increase tuition rates because there was no bill or law saying they couldn’t. If it isn't necessary, why have the need to make students pay more for an education that will not only benefit the students but the government and future itself. This was not the first time that college prices where brought up, back in 2003 Rep. Buck McKeon had proposed that if Colleges did not stop from increasing tuition they would not get as much money from taxpayers as they had been the past couple of years, and since Buck and Obama proposed that nothing has really been …show more content…
The people may say that it will take too long for the government to do something about it or even put it to work and that it will affect the way our economic system works. It may be that some people are not going though that problem so they don't consider the necessity of doing something about it and want the tax money to be used in the things they want, after all they pay their taxes for that reason and if they are not struggling with their kids than they may not feel one bit upset about the situation. It will cut out a lot of money from the governments pocket but if they can do it with other things they can do it for something that will benefit on the long run. Even though it is a very important topic, some of the students may feel like if they don't have to pay as much for classes or have that many resources required to attend college they will take it as a joke and not try as hard as if they had to pay the regular price and have many resources needed. It could take up to 5 years to make it regulate with the system and have the right way being applied. The higher class, high income families may feel like it is unnecessary, and their money is not being used for something that will benefit them which may cause it to fail. However, if the college just brought down their prices we would not have to use as much of the tax money for the students and everyone could get away with
Some of these industries include plumbing and health care. Therefore by charging for tuition at universities we are able to create funding on lower vocational jobs, were still without degrees they are significant to our country. Aside from job spending, this will also increase taxes. According to Forbes, an advisor network, Mike Patton has gathered that the public debt per taxpayer in 2004 was $72,051, and in 2017 the projected debt will rise to $161,022. Furthermore the spending of tuition will raise taxes and prevent the advancement of skills in vocational jobs. Secondly this will cause a dramatic increase in graduates, were this sounds astounding, 50% of the graduates will work for jobs that do not require a degree. Although others may argue that those who turn away from degrees will turn to vocational jobs which are also important to the economy, some may refute that the spending of their tuition was worthless and only adds to the debt crisis. This takes away not only the value of opportunity to become a doctor, or a scientist, but inflates the misuse of tuition spending. Finally free tuition will alter the value and quality of education. According to
More than a century later, President Abraham Lincoln passed the Morrill Land Grant Act of 1862 which enabled more than 70 colleges and universities to be created (Staff). The GI Bill in 1956 gave Veterans an opportunity many could not afford before. All of these instances in America’s history have made it easier for ordinary American citizens to learn more about the world they live in. There are numerous opportunities for the leaders of this country to help the issue of college tuitions rising, it is just a matter of initiative. As Bernie Sanders states in his “Public College Should Be Free” speech to the senate, “It is time to build on the progressive movement of the past.” When all younger people with the determination and the aptitude can reach their full potential, regardless of their economic or social circumstances at birth, America will have a tougher economy and a stronger democracy, a motive that goes back before Americans today can
Regardless of how the country finds the money to fund free higher education for all people who want to get a degree it needs to happen. People have to understand that yes, this won 't fix all our problems, but with the rise of tuition and jobs asking for more, I feel like we owe it to the next generation the right to a free college education even if it 's only for the first two
Free college tuition, or even a completely free college education, might sound great, but on whose shoulders does the burden fall? A lot of people want free college tuition because of the constantly rising costs of going to a university, junior college, or community college. A lot of the argument advocates use is that the student debt in this country amounts to $1.2 trillion. While that is a lot of money owed, it is the price you have to pay for an invaluable privilege in the U.S. College tuition shouldn’t be free because taxpayers will need to pay more, students will take their classes less seriously, and states will need to pull money from other departments in order to make up for the lost money. The first reason for being against this “If a college education has value, why give it away?”
High school graduates don’t have enough money to pay for college, they barely have any money at all. College tuition should stay reduced at an affordable cost so students can afford it and not have debt. According to Steven Goodman, in his article Why College Tuition Should Be Regulated, “two-thirds of American undergraduates are in debt” (Why 1), which is ridiculous considering the fact that they have not graduated yet. Even though he said that in 2011, it is very aware that it will continuously go up if no one puts a stop to it.
As we all know the current tuition of community colleges has change in a vase way by rising up every year due to lack of funds from the government to aid for school and among other reasons. President Obama announced
College does have its good and bad, but the tuition money needs to decrease in both public and private schools. College should be the best time of everybody’s life, but money shouldn’t be a distraction.
Some students would argue that a college education is not a vital aspect of the future of children because it is too much schooling, costs too much, and it is not needed for their future. First of all, these students have struggled through 13 years of school whether elementary, middle, or high school. They have endured many long days and late nights to pass their classes. Although it is true that 4+ more years of school will be mentally tough and hard to endure, these important years will help shape
Having the college experience is everyone’s dream, especially High School students who are ready to get out into the world and explore. College is very important for furthering someone’s career, but no one thinks about all the costs and the stress that comes along with college. Tuition fees and costs are increasing more and more each year. Now days it feels like you have to be a millionaire just to attend a good college and get a good degree in what you were attending for. There are some students that do not have a lot of money and live on very little things with their parents, but indeed are very smart and have a 4.0 GPA. Those students are the ones that are unable to attend college if they cannot afford it. College tuition is too expensive,
There is no doubt that college is expensive, price tags for some universities go over a quarter of a million for just a bachelors degree! (That’s if you graduate in four too). The extravagant price for college is no doubt crazy. Trying to better yourself and your future shouldn’t cost $250,000 plus. If public universities were to be free a plethora of problems could be solved instantly. According to Forbes the National student loan debt has surpassed 1.2 trillion dollars (Denhart )! This number is growing exponentially as more students enroll in to college. Why question then whether college should be free? Well, this number is the total amount of student loan debt from all students that have exited college. Some of these students are freshly graduated while some are aged with the wisdom trying to pay their loans back. If public universities were to be free and funded by our federal government, our government would pay this amount within ten years. Relatively a short amount of time considering that the student loan debt is an accumulation debt from students that have graduated more than ten year ago, also this also greatly increase with the following years as well.
Think about it, if people had money left over by the debt being lowered they probably would buy things from the stores and would get tax which means the economy would be making more money. The cost of college should be decreased, which would make the economy we live in a better place. The economy we live in today is pitiful from all the high priced things. “And yet, Baum says, somehow, families are paying for it. "And the reason people are paying for it is because the return to the investment is so high." No matter what a higher education costs them, most Americans think it will be worth it, she says.” (Sanchez, 2014). If the money for college was less students could buy the things that they need for college. Students could also buy things that they need in everyday life, such as food, tissue, or any necessities. If the amount was lessened and students had money left over it could give them the start of their new life. “Colleges have no trouble filling seats, even with rising costs, so they keep spending and increasing tuition.” (Lin,
Higher education costs have been increasing at a rapid pace, faster than inflation for the economy as a whole, for the past fifty years. It started in the 1960’s when the federal government passed the Higher Education Act to increase the amount of people able to afford and attend college. Regardless of the Unites States Government efforts to increase the affordability of college, federal aid programs have not risen to expectations due to the ever-increasing college prices. To lower the price of college, the government needs to cut back on student financial spending to go only to the lowest income families and create tax incentives for families to start saving up on their own.
Tuition increases in the U.S. have been causing controversy since shortly after World War II.
As colleges’ funds dry up, colleges must turn to the public to further support higher education. By raising state taxes, colleges can collect funds to help improve the school’s budgets. The state provides funds from the taxes for colleges to receive a certain amount for each student currently enrolled. All community and traditional four year colleges collect these funds in order to maintain the school’s budget. As reporter, Eric Kelderman states, “less than a third of colleges’ budget is based from state taxes”. The school’s budget is how colleges are able to provide academic support programs, an affordable intuition, and hire more counselors. Colleges must now depend on state taxes more than ever for public colleges. Without collecting more funds from state taxes, as author, Scott Carlson explains how Mr. Poshard explains to senators “our public universities are moving quickly toward becoming private universities…affordable only to those who have the economic wherewithal to them” (qtd. in.) Public colleges must be affordable to anyone who wishes to attend. If colleges lack to provide this to students, it can affect dropouts, a student’s ability focus, and cause stress. The problem of lack of funding is that colleges have insufficient funds. Therefore, the best possible solution for the problem of lack of funding would be increasing and collecting more funds from state taxes.
... Or we could also look at “Implementing new taxes on speculative Wall Street transactions” (Redd) as famously advocated by Senator Bernie Sanders and lastly “Cracking down on wasteful government spending” (Redd). All the mentioned solutions could bring about free higher education at no cost to the American taxpayer. Ultimately, the United States should bring forth a free, government-subsidized, higher education, because of its benefits to the economy, creation of equal opportunity, and the resolution of the student loan crisis. Even though it will require funding, there are certainly innocuous alternatives that could provide this, rather than putting the extra stress on average American taxpayers.