Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages of public order
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages of public order
Public order in today’s world is of high necessity, without it the world would basically be chaotic and we would not be able to live our normal lives or appreciate any of the freedom that we have today. In my view, public order is comparable to an everyday job; if you do the right things and follow the rules at a job, then you will soon or later be rewarded or receive good compliments, but if you do not follow the rules and continue to do things wrong then you can end up losing your job completely. It is the same thing for public order, the more things you do right the less chance you have of getting caught up with the law. Public order in everyday life is there, but there could be more. Some of the places that I go to I feel like I have to
“Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices.” (Pg 2, P1) Paine states that with the society and the existence of a government, this allows the society to live happily and united. The existence of a government will also be able to control a society with rules to live by and keeping the community safe. Paine demonstrates that the existence of the government system is indeed a positive necessity to have within a
Thomas Paine wrote, “the more simple anything is, the less liable it is to be disordered.” He also goes on to argue that if something is simple and disorder was to occur, it would be easier to repair since issues wouldn’t be as complex (in comparison to a mixed government). Later on, Paine continues and makes a connection between law and a king. He argues that in America, law is king. He says, “…let the crown, at the conclusion of the ceremony, be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is.” Paine claims that just like a king, laws should not behold the virtue and power that rests among the people. Instead, the “crown”, or powers should be scattered to those who have the right; the people have power because of their natural
What this basically says is that laws are made up to maintain order, monitor. actions, and work in the best interest of society as a whole. If there were no laws, chaos and anarchy would be widespread. This is why society has set up government. The sex of the sex.... ...
The public interest defence was created by the deformation act 2013, to protect defamatory material. The concept of public interest can be a vague term. What one might consider public interest someone else may not? For example, some people believe celebrity gossip is the public interest. The public recognises the term public interest and it is used as a defence for media intrusions of privacy. Everyone has the right to privacy, but sometimes this is not the case. Depending on the person or the organisation this can be invaded depending on the degree of the public interest. In order for something to be in the public interest, the subject has to be of interest for a collective amount of people not just for an individual. The breaches of exposing privacy would be exempt if it was to be to expose crime if an investigator was to breach someone’s privacy but they were exposing crime, which would be of public interest, and then this would be acceptable. Protecting the public health or safety of the public is also an exception, protecting the public from being misled. Also disclosing someone’s failure or likely failure by any obligation they have. In order for these reasons to become except the publication will need to justify why this would
...he public is the dichotomy, which means that decisions are made without the political environment. As always, the disagreement for certain decisions made in the government will be present, but believe that the officials are working in a unison team to try to provide the best for all.
Is public order important? Public order is not only important but is an absolute necessity for the Individuals within the society to know that all efforts are being made to ensure the safety of our citizens in order for the very structure of our nation to stand erect. Without order we are prone to experience oppression by our neighboring nations and leaving our state of independenc...
...at having order or freedom alone brings along many conflicts and disagreements within society. Therefore it is believed that neither should be fully implied, hence in order to promote a healthy society, a basic equilibrium between the two should be present.
The basis of criminal justice in the United States is one founded on both the rights of the individual and the democratic order of the people. Evinced through the myriad forms whereby liberty and equity marry into the mores of society to form the ethos of a people. However, these two systems of justice are rife with conflicts too. With the challenges of determining prevailing worth in public order and individual rights coming down to the best service of justice for society. Bearing a perpetual eye to their manifestations by the truth of how "the trade-off between freedom and security, so often proposed so seductively, very often leads to the loss of both" (Hitchens, 2003, para. 5).
Private good prevails over public good, as people tend to act in their self-interest. They want what they think will propel their life forward. Private good only gives us a temporary pleasure that influences us to want more. On the other hand, public good generates a sense of contentment to the individual, which can spread to the rest of society. Ideally, public good should be more pursued for an individual to embrace a good life as it encompasses happiness that private good cannot produce. “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” and “The Prisoner Who Wore Glasses” demonstrate how people make choices for their own benefit, one where a family’s privacy is violated and the other where bribery reigns. Both readings also illustrate that interest in the public good would help maintain a good life and the outcome of the choices would be favorable to the majority.
How does humanity govern its self? The world, as seen today, is an extremely diverse nation with various, backgrounds, traditions, and customs. The aforementioned are informal social controls used to help govern citizens in an unceremonious way. These informal controls developed over time into formal controls, laws, to try and restore harmony within a society and punish those who are in violation of laws. Laws are defined as a set of rules developed by a body of legislation to maintain order and peace of an organized people. Laws can be used as an umbrella to blanket a multitude of subsets, such as, political, administrative, financial, and civil infractions. Public Order crimes can also be placed in to a subcategory of criminal legislation. When defining a criminal infraction there are two sides of the spectrum, the victim and the offender. Drug usage and drug-related crimes have the most relevant association when it comes to violation of federal and state statutes. So what happens when there is not apparent “victim?” Is there a thing as a “victimless” crime? Public order and drug crimes may not seem to have an effect in an instant, but over time it damages our nation as a whole.
From the public sphere comes a social contract, a contract in which citizens have to abide by in order to ensure that others have their personal freedoms all the while keeping their own intact. Jean-Jacques Rousseau brought to light this social contract that has been put into a democratic system of thought. He believed that the contract enabled us to make a society in which all are equal and conventionally free. The consequences of becoming part of this social contract can be daunting however; the stipulations are that when one signs the social contract they have dropped some of his or her own freedoms and gained an equal share of conventional liberty. However, Democracy is rather than a slave to the people more so an employee, giving the people
At the first glance of the words “social order”, one will notice that the phrase is about a stable society, with everyone having one common understanding of the world. However, if one must delve beneath the surface of the controversial phrase, one will notice that leaders of this concept created this system so that persons dwelling in that society would view certain situations, and the system itself, as being equal, fair and just. Traditionally, in order to have a society in which the persons are engaged in some form of order, a number of restrictions were implemented on freedom of speech and also the sharing of ideas among peers. The concept of “social order” allows persons in a particular society to have one constant cultural (religious), and political belief. Based on Comte and Spencer’s argument, social order in modern society should not be as strict as that in traditional society because of our ability as individuals to think rationally.
The Government and laws are the two reasons why the world is stable. The Government is important because it is a representative of all the people living in the country as a whole. Without these two things there would be anarchy, people would go around killing, hurting, robbing, and people would go running amok .There wouldn’t be any type of peace because people could do anything they want to do. The murder rate would go higher and higher by the day.There wouldn't be in stability in the United States. Most likely if the United States didn't have a government it would be a dictatorship.
Before I address the importance of the authorities in social order, I must first explain the meaning of social order. As stated earlier social order is the structured relationships between humans in society, but that poses an important question: Does the social order determine the society or does the society determine the social order? Based off the definition of social order the way people interact with each other is influenced by the teachings of society. In an unaware obedience humans tend to follow the social norms and standards of society in personal interactions and relationships to assimilate into
Justice is a vital part of governmental systems. Justice is a way to control the activities of citizens without infringing on their rights. Without justice, the acts of the citizens living under a government could not be very well controlled. There would be no punishments for bad behavior with would make this type of behavior more common. Even though justice acts as a way to loosely control the acts of citizens, it doesn't affect their liberty. Liberty is freedom. No one would want to live under a government under which they have no freedom and are controlled. Defense is also very important in a government. The protection of the people should be in high priority of the government. The government is there to serve the people and make life better for everyone. If they don't protect the people then there is no point in the government.