Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does the civil rights movement affect today
Impact on today's situation of the civil rights movement
Effects of protests
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does the civil rights movement affect today
According to Martin Luther King Jr., “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust (King, 1963).” King was the leader of the nonviolent resistance and this quote is from the “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” Rebellion against the government should be necessary because it could help the rest of the people, motivate the government and the people, or lastly, what it means to be rebellious. First, a rebellion could help people by telling them what other people think and that they do not have to be afraid to speak out the truth. It could benefit the nation by knowing what others think. John Proctor said in The Crucible, “Spoke or silent, a promise is surely made (Miller, 61).” He is saying that if you either speak your word or stay silent, you can still rebel against what the community or government says. If you want to speak your word do it, no one is going to stop you. Just be you and do not be like everyone that does not want to be apart of anything. Another quote from The Crucible said by Danforth was, “You must understand, sir, that a person is either with this court or he must be counted …show more content…
The reason is that people do not want to be controlled all the time and people who rebel against the government want their independence. Tony Warren wrote that, “It is to be anti or opposed to government rule in the sense that we refuse to obey the laws laid down by the governing bodies (Warren)”. What he is saying is that you can call yourself an anti-government person or that you are oppressed to what the government does and rule. Another quote by him is “The definition of rebellion in this context is the disobedience against a lawful authority (Warren)”. Rebelling is like going against the government and they say to do or go by. Also disliking what the government does. So that when they rebel against the government, they have a reason to do
History has encountered many different individuals whom have each impacted the 21 in one way or another; two important men whom have revolted against the government in order to achieve justice are Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. Both men impacted numerous individuals with their powerful words, their words carried the ability to inspire both men and women to do right by their morality and not follow unjust laws. “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” by David Henry Thoreau along with King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, allow the audience to understand what it means to protest for what is moral.
The two essays, "Civil Disobedience," by Henry David Thoreau, and "Letter From a Birmingham Jail," by Martin Luther King, Jr., effectively illustrate the authors' opinions of justice. Each author has his main point; Thoreau, in dealing with justice as it relates to government, asks for "not at once no government, but at once a better government. King contends that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Both essays offer a complete argument for justice, but, given the conditions, King's essay remains more effective, in that its persuasive techniques have more practical application. Both essays extensively implement both emotional and ethical appeal to give their respective ideas validity.
It made people aware of events that were going on, what was going on with their government, and how weak it was. Thomas Jefferson said that revolts were a necessary evil, and one of the reasons for that was that it promoted general awareness of public affairs. This general awareness promotes a country populated with well-educated people who can make proper choices to influence their country. This is how people realized that The Articles of Confederation needed to be revised, since the government was terrible under it.
There are many situations in life where a rebellion is required for improvement. For instance, the Stono Rebellion, Pontiac’s War, Shay’s Rebellion, and Bacon’s Rebellion all had the same idea in common, they all wanted change. They all wanted to improve America’s society. The tactic in each rebellion was different, the motives were different, and not all the outcomes were successful. All of these rebellions also had unobvious internal struggles which either weaken or strengthen them. It is likely that Bacon’s Rebellion could have been avoided because it did not leave a positive impact on America’s society. Although, if the Stono Rebellion, Pontiac’s war, and Shay’s Rebellion never occurred the government would not be
Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau each write exemplary persuasive essays that depict social injustice and discuss civil disobedience, which is the refusal to comply with the law in order to prove a point. In his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” King speaks to a specific audience: the African Americans, and discusses why he feels they should bring an end to segregation. Thoreau on the other hand, in “Civil Disobedience,” speaks to a broader, non-addressed audience as he largely expresses his feelings towards what he feels is an unjust government. Both essays however, focus on the mutual topics of morality and justice and use these topics to inform and motivate their audience to, at times, defy the government in order to establish the necessary justice.
The civil and eventually violent disobedience of the thirteen colonies against England resulted in the birth of now one of the most powerful nations in the world. The civil disobedience of those willing to go against the norm allowed for Americans to be able to marry who they chose. It is because of Nelson Mandela getting arrested for what he believed in to allow for south Africa to be free from segregation. Civil disobedience has paved the way for society to become better because at some points society was not based on fairness. It was based on cruel ideologies and those ideologies put laws into affect that were meant to lower certain groups of people. So by breaking those laws it awakens those groups and allows them the motivation to go up against these unfair laws and in doing this allows for these unfair laws to be
Justice is often misconceived as injustice, and thus some essential matters that require more legal attentions than the others are neglected; ergo, some individuals aim to change that. The principles of civil disobedience, which are advocated in both “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau and “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. to the society, is present up to this time in the U.S. for that purpose.
If the people choose to rebel, they are taken away or punished as a whole. By taking away rebellion, the government can use the past to their advantage, or even change it for their own benefit.
Mahatma Gandhi, a prominent leader in the independence movement of India once said, “Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state becomes lawless and corrupt.”(brainyquotes.com) Gandhi states that protest and civil disobedience are necessary when the authority becomes unscrupulous. This correlates to “Declaration of Independence,” by Thomas Jefferson; “Civil Disobedience,” by Henry David Thoreau; and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” by Martin Luther King Jr., because all three leaders felt that civil disobedience was important to help protest against an unjust ruling. Jefferson stood up to the injustice of the king by writing the Declaration of Independence and urged others to stand up for the independence of America. Thoreau exemplified
Doctor Martin Luther King Jr.’s essay “Love, Law, and Civil Disobedience” has two main features. The first feature of King’s essay is a call for action; action to bring about change. The second feature, the more easily viewed feature of this essay is a call for a specific type of action to bring about a specific type of change. The change King wishes to bring about is a peace and equality brought about through non-violent actions.
There have been few occasions where the rebellious leaders have created a downfall for our country, such as Hitler, but it is biased to assume all experiences of these traits will be destructive. People often have a predisposition that the words rebellion and disobedience are dissenting, which is not always valid. In events such as the American Revolution, civil rights, and women’s suffrage; these would not have been obtainable without a characteristic such as disobedience. This has created social progress, and can continue to create progress for America. From slavery, women's rights, religious life, voting, American attitudes were forever changed. The American Revolution produced a new outlook among Americans that had ramifications into the future. Groups excluded from equality, such as slaves and women, would draw their inspirations from revolutionary
“No radical change on the plane of history is possible without crime,” This quote from Hermann Keyserling is just one of many statements that help describe the meaning and true raw power of Civil Disobedience. Civil disobedience as defined by Merriam Webster is the “refusal to obey governmental demands or commands especially as a nonviolent and usually collective means of forcing concessions from the government”. The most promising and understandable of the definitions of Civil Disobedience would be that given to us by Gandhi from India “Compassion in the form of respectful disagreement”. Even the Veterans Fast for Life from here in the United States must agree when saying, “when leaders act contrary to conscience, we must act contrary to leaders.” To understand why civil disobedience is so important in our lives you must first look into your heart and realize that the integrity of mankind has no need of rules.
...y, and also fidelity to the law. Acts of civil disobediences are aimed to defend principles of justice. In King’s case he aims to persuade the local government and the businesses to comply with desegregation laws. It was important for him to communicate fidelity to the law. You should lovingly break a law, because your reason behind protesting to to achieve what you see as a higher good. You are not directly hurting the people. King’s argument ultimately is you can break the law to make the law more just. You are attempting to break the law to show that the law is unjust, and it is an act of saying that the law can be made better than it is now. He’s gathered his facts and understanding of the law, it is 100% clear there’s a problem. For civil disobedience to be justified a real injustice must exist, or else it wouldn’t addresses a sense of justice of the majority.
Throughout the duration of human existence there have been defining moments in our history where the resistance and zealous disobedience of an oppressed populace has led to a transformed society. Slavery, oppression, and the forced subjugation of minorities have been shrouded truths for our minuscule history. The precedent fact that an ethnocentric elite always manages to oppress the belittled majority is a truth not easily ignored. King argues that the virtue of freedom is not “voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” Citizens are obligated to fight for their fundamental rights; Widener’s “Tank Man,” Thoreau’s “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience,” and the Arab Spring validate King’s claim that freedom is a virtue that can only be acquired through resistance and insubordination.
Girls and boys, men and women, rebel against others because they believe that what others ask of them are wrong. People believe that not everything being requested is the right way to go. What's being asked could either be illegal or not approved by today's society. Men and women usually will go against anyone who tries to make them do things that are illegal. The myth states that Landrat knew, best, but Fredrick concluded the truth was opposite (Macdonogh 10). Anders states that, “if tea was brought in, men were not allowed to unload it off the ship”(2). Even since the 1700s, men and women ignored the government and capitols laws. If people believed that what the government is requesting, they would just ignore them and keep doing what they please. Even if they government specifically said they are not allowed to do such a thing.