Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hunting ethics essay
Anti hunting argument
Negative effects of hunting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hunting ethics essay
Hunting pre dates the human species, being around for millions of years. Long before any humanoids came into view. It was the main way of getting food before agriculture came. Various tools were used by the earliest humans from sharp spears, to simple traps, to regular old stones. Even when agricultural pursuits started to grow throughout the world hunting was still carried on to what we now call Hunting Season. The question is, is it wrong? Many believe so.(N.p., n.d. Web.)
During the 1940s and 50s, hunting had reached its all time peak. Many people enjoyed it, but as it grew, so did ethical and environmental controversies, sharply dividing opposers from supporters. The people believing in animal rights and environmentalists deemed
…show more content…
For example, Trophy Hunting, which “involves killing the animal and taking it as a trophy.” Hunters will mount them to walls or stuff them and not really even use the meat for anything. Sometimes, hunters often fail to kill the targeted animal. This is known as an unsuccessful hunt. The animal that they wounded is left to die a slow painful death, never to be put out its misery. From an environmentalist’s point of view, hunting can damage ecosystems. You can only hunt so much of an animal until it becomes endangered, or worse, extinct. There’s also the problem of poaching. Poaching is “the killing of an animal that has some sort of value in it.” Elephants, for example, have tusks made of ivory and hunters kill them just to sell the tusks and make profit of them.(Lin, Doris. "Scientific Biological Arguments Against Hunting.") Even after all that is done to these poor animals, hunters still find a way to back up their reason why hunting is a good …show more content…
This may be true but there is also the problem of over hunting populations to the point of endangerment or extinction like the dodo bird or tasmanian tiger. Hunters would also say that hunting is a good way to get exercise and get know the outside environment. Well, there’s also the possibility of getting hurt by other hunters during hunting. Sometimes there are inexperienced hunters who accidentally shoot others mistaking them for an animal. this has happened many times before and is proof of why hunting is dangerous to people and animals all over the world.(Jadhav, Aparna. "Hunting Pros and Cons.")
Now you see the dangers of hunting to humans and animals. Environmentalists and Animal rights activists are trying to save our animals and people from the dangers of what was once the main, and maybe only, way of getting food thousands and thousands of years ago. Many hunters still fight for their hunting grounds against environmentalists. This question still remains a mystery to many. Whose side are you
One reason it should be illegal is big game hunting lowers animal populations. An example that shows this is the, “area with the most hunting showed the biggest population declines over the past 25 years,“ ("Studies Show There Are Many Sides in the African Lion-hunting Debate”). This shows that when animals are hunted largely in an
There’s another catch to trophy hunting: it is extremely expensive. Permits for trophy hunting usually cost thousands of dollars, which leads to the idea that killing animals can actually help conservation. This concept might seem ridiculous at first, but trophy-hunting permits bring in a plethora of money. For instance, the so-called “ten-day ‘elephant package’ could cost… 36,000 [dollars]” (learnenglish). Even if you merely wish to watch the hunt, you are obliged to pay 3,800 dollars (abcnews). The prices are strikingly high, meaning that so is the revenue. South Africa alone brings in more than 744 million dollars every single year, making it its “most profitable form of commercial land use” (learnenglish). This enormous amount of money can not only be used to aid the many third world countries in Africa, but also with conservation. Many argue that by killing wild game during hunting, it causes some species to go extinct. However, strong economic incentive has motivated landowners to expand their territories, reintroduce species, and take care of the animals in general, which would indicate the opposite: more animals are safe. One might even conclude that the world is saving animals, by killing
The right to hunt is the law. The twenty-ninth Article states, "...securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others..." If this is the law then it can not be infringed. With this there really is no question of big game hunting. These rights are personal rights of the citizens of the United States. Parents can choose what they want for there own children and let them do what they desire, and if that desire is hunting then let it be. When other people who oppose hunting try and stop this freedom then they are the ones at fault and are doing wrong by infringing on the rights of others. These actions are illegal and should be taken care of. In C M Dixon's article, "The Banning of Hunting is an Affront to Freedom," he stated that, "He has never heard of hunters violating the just requirements of public order or general welfare" (2). From the hunting experiences that I have had I agree with this statement one hundred percent.
Despite there being numerous argumentative points for both the hunter and the environmentalist there is no definite answer as to whether hunting should be permitted or not. Each individual has their own perspective on hunting and what is acceptable and what is intolerable. Hunting may be viewed as acceptable for survival purposes only by some and others may approve sport hunting as well. Some environmentalist would like to see all forms of hunting and trapping completely banned including pig and dairy farms. Hunting can be seen as a way to entertain and relax in one’s eyes while it can also be seen as the cruelest form of animal cruelty and murder from another individual’s perspective. Hunting is completely subjective to the views and morals of the person trying to decide what is right and what is wrong.
I have just shown you some right-wing substantial proof on why I think that hunting is foundationally right. I will support the second amendment and the right to hunt ‘til the day I die. Hunting is rooted deep inside in the blood of all people whether we want to admit it or not. It is natural, it is instinctive, and most of all, it is traditional. And by the way… it’s freakin’ fun!!
Hunting centuries ago was a cruel way of survival for humans but now it's no more than a violent form of recreation. Hunters should only hunt if they need it for sustenance which most
Hunters often reveal that being in nature provides time to clear the mind. In the woods, there is no rush, no schedule, and no deadlines; nature moves at its own pace. This interaction provides a deep spiritual connection with the land, the wildlife, and our planet. Hunting has been around since the beginning of time and has been in many people 's lives for generations, these are some reasons why people all across America continue to hunt. Hunting has many benefits such as reducing deer related car accidents, controlling deer densities in heavily human populated areas, creates jobs, and feeding and supporting families. Thus, deer hunting is necessary for several reasons.
One of the most imperative reasons to ban trophy hunting is because it creates an imbalance in which it can lead to what scientists refer as ¨evolution in reverse¨. Jeffrey Flocken from CNN claims that trophy hunting is part of the tendency referred as “survival of the weakest”. Scientists
Hunting demonstrates the ability to protect and provide mainly referred to males providing their families with meat from the animals and protecting their land. (“Modern Hunters Are Stewards of Wildlife and the Environment.”) The economy today is very unsustainable and hunting is the key to feeding the hungry. (“Modern Hunters Are Stewards of Wildlife and the Environment.”) There are many food banks today that will accept the meat provided by animals and feed hungry organizations that cannot buy food themselves. What most people don’t know is most of the money used by hunters that go towards hunting licenses, hunting tags, and hunting lotteries to hunt in particular spots go to wildlife research and habitat protections in that hunters home state. With approximately 12.5 million hunters in the World today a lot more money gets sent to these organizations than people would ever think. Overall, hunting is a positive force because it provides an economic motive for maintaining wildlife habitats. This keeps animals in their own habitats and away from people and their homes as much as possible. Some see this sport very cruel and un-humane but overall it is helping this World out way more than people think. If we didn’t have people who hunt or knew how to hunt we would be very reliant on other foods. Such as farming fruits and vegetables, which could go extinct if something devastating happens. We wouldn’t have the protein and vitamins needed in the meat we eat. Hunting is very necessary, and everyone should know how to hunt or learn soon. It’s helpful now, and will be very helpful in the future if there is a reason we can’t rely on cattle for meat anymore. We will have to figure out other ways to get meat, and without hunting it is very unlikely that
Those who oppose hunting as it stands today, please step forward. The question whether if hunting is helping or hurting our environment has been an ongoing yet debatable issue for a little while now. A variety of arguments have been made about this issue. It is definitely a big issue because it concerns the well-being of many different people nationwide. Mainly it raises attention to the moral and economic questions, as well as the pros and cons, dealing with the way we utilize our native wildlife.
The problem is that people do not know that they exist or even why they do. As mentioned earlier, hunters defend their actions by saying that they are controlling the animal population, but have they ever taken the time to think about why there are some areas that are overpopulated? One reason that causes some places to be overpopulated by deer is by damaging their habitat. By destroying forests, they really have nowhere else to go. Eventually, some species just cannot survive and they die off. Deforestation is a major environmental issue. It results in a great loss of different species. An environmentalist named John Muir was very passionate about preserving trees, and helping to prevent deforestation. In his essay “Save the Redwoods,” Muir tells us that “we cannot escape responsibility as their guardians.” We can help decrease the number of trees that are cut down by recycling materials and using recycled products. Sure, this will not completely stop deforestation, but it helps. What is important is that people become informed of what is going on with the environment. Being informed about issues can help encourage people to do something about
Hunting for sport is legal, and should remain that way. Many arguments against hunting for sport claim it is a “violent form of recreation” and “we have no right to take an animals life” for example, an opposing viewpoints article “Sport Hunting is an Unnecessary Form of Cruelty to Animals” says just that. HoweverI argue that we are part of this planet, as well as it’s ecosystem. We are (in ways) predators. An article on sport hunting, “Hunting for Sport” compares “hunters and the hunted” to a mountain lion and a deer. Is the lion at fault for hunting the deer? No. The mountain lion’s duty is to play the role as predator as well as keeping it’s prey’s population away from its ecosystems capacity. The ecosystem can no longer always support and control all animals populations.
The topic of hunting has always been filled with controversy, excitement and trepidation for the environment. Both sides have varies ideas as to what is wrong and right. I realize that many people do not understand why people have to hunt or why people do hunt. One of the questions that kept coming to mind is why so many people are against hunting when their ancestors hunted and without hunting many of them would not be alive today. This question is relevant because many people are becoming to be worried that animals are in pain when being hunted and that it is unfair for people to hunt selfless animals with modern weaponry, and with many people going against the right to own guns.
It has always been a part of our every day life. But as times have changed and we have come to live in a more modern society, and with that many people's views and beliefs on animal hunting has changed. But in any type of debate or topic such as this, “Is animal hunting permissible?” There will always be two side and there are people who believe that it is okay to hunt, and then there are others who are opposed to
If this trend continues, by the year 2055, the number of species which are hunted could be increased. reduced by as much as 81 percent. (Satchell 31) Not only does hunting reduce the number of animals, it can also be unnecessarily cruel to the creatures. When deer are bowhunted, they often are. not instantly killed by the snare.