Why Is Hannibal Bad

213 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Hannibal analysis

I am so sorry that I could not write you through all these years of battle. We lost many soldiers just trying to cross the mountains on foot into Italy. It was not a good time of year to cross over the Alps into Italy. The weather was so bad that many men and animals slipped and fell to their deaths.The mountain tribes also killed a lot of our soldiers and took our food and left us starving. After many days we finally got to the Po Valley where the Gauls feed us and joined our forces. It has been many years trying to conquer one small town after another to get to Rome. I thought Hannibal was a good general because we were successful in conquering all of the small towns before we got to Rome. Many of the decisions Hannibal made did not

Show More
Related

  • Claudius’s Decision to Invade Britain in AD43 as Motivated by a Desire to Emulate Julius Caesar

    1487 Words  | 3 Pages

    Caesar, who was seen as a great leader of Rome. This point of view has

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was Julius Caesar A Hero

    617 Words  | 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar was very heroic to the Roman people. He did a wonderful job in conquering

    Read More

  • How Is Hannibal A Ethical Leader?

    1814 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although a genius on the battlefield, where he used surprise and maneuver to overcome the relatively small size of his force, I do not believe that Hannibal was an ethical leader. He did not always exhibit the essential intellectual traits of critical thinking, nor did he always enforce ethical standards. To clarify, Hannibal’s vision was for independence for territories. But based on some of his actions, the concept of ‘freedom for all’ was not a part of that vision. Hannibal exhibited the trait of intellectual hypocrisy; he didn’t hold himself to the same standards that he fought for when he was faced the ethical dilemma of feeding, equipping, and paying his troops for their service; or selling Roman captives into slavery. In an effort to take care of his men, he succumbed to the latter, after the failed attempt to negotiate a ransom with Rome. And so, Roman captives were sold to a local slave trader (Commire & Klezmer, 1994). Perhaps, he fell prey to ethical relativism, using this ethical trap as a way to justify the inconsistency between his thoughts and his actions. Or maybe he didn’t care; but we’ll never know. What we do know is that this lack of intellectual integrity is opposite of the behavior that is required of an ethical leader (CF03SG, 2013, p. 7). Most assuredly, his actions confused his team of warriors, and affected their view of his professional character, especially since non-Roman captives had been released to their respective countries.

    Read More

  • Hannibal: Africa’s Tactical Genius

    1192 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hannibal is, perhaps, most notable for moving from Iberia over the Pyrenees, across the Alps and into northern Italy with an estimated army of 38,000 soldiers and war elephants braving the harsh climate and terrain, the guerilla tactics of the native tribes and commanding an extremely lingual-diverse army. He was a distinguished tactician, able to determine his opponent’s strengths and weaknesses, and coordinate his battles accordingly. He also wasn’t above making allies when the time called for it, winning over many allies of Rome in the process during his 15-year invasion before a Roman counter-invasion of North Africa forced ...

    Read More

  • Robert E Lee

    871 Words  | 2 Pages

    General Robert E. Lee is a prime example of an excellent general whose brilliance was impeded by the Confederate’s lack of resources. General Ulysses S. Grant’s genius is rebuffed when compared to that of Lee’s. Great military leaders should have a connection with the public and their soldiers. General Lee emerged overnight as the Confederate hero after the Seven Days’ Battle. His soldiers developed an almost divine belief in him because this battle was the first major victory since the First Battle of Bull Run and halted a succession of military attacks.

    Read More

  • What Are The Most Important Events In Western Civilization

    1046 Words  | 3 Pages

    The war started because of conflicting interests between the two, especially the expanding Roman Republic. At the end of the war, thousands of lives were lost, Rome ascended into power, conquering Carthage and becoming the most powerful state in the Mediterranean. During one point of the Second War, or the Hannibalic War, Carthage nearly brought Rome to her knees. With reinforcement from their Gallic allies, Carthage defeated the Roman army in the Battles of Trebia, Trasimene, and Cannae. Had Rome not defeated Carthage, the history Western civilization would be drastically altered, shaping a very different world than the one we live in today. It is said “All roads lead to Rome”. There is a lot of truth to this quote because Rome, with all its power and glory, paved the road for our modern society; it allowed Christianity to spread and flourish, the basis for democracy, and served as melting pot of cultures and customs.Rome can be considered one of the greatest influences on Western civilization, leaving us with priceless gifts that we will always

    Read More

  • Tacitus Germania Analysis

    1796 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alongside the rive Elbe, the Marcomanni and Quadi have great power and with bravery they were able to drive out the Boii (42). They had kings that were intertwined with Rome and they were in need of assistance when it came to an army rather than financial (42). The behind of the Marcommani and Quadi, lives the Cotini and Osi where they actually did not speak a lick of German and were not considered German

    Read More

  • Great Generals of the Revolutionary War and the Civil War

    1877 Words  | 4 Pages

    Great generals are crucial to the prospering of a nation. They impart unity to a country and defend against any enemy it may encounter. There are two wars showcasing such brilliant generals in American history: the Revolutionary War and the Civil War. In one, the English colonists on the continent of North America broke off from their mother country to form their own. In the other, the nation of the United States, having been firmly established at that point, was fighting against itself over the issue of slavery. In both instances, the people needed strong, brave, and selfless generals to lead them through their trials. Generals George Washington of the Revolutionary War and Ulysses Grant of the Civil War are excellent exemplars of these qualities. While both generals were successful in their respective wars and are two of the greatest generals of American history, George Washington was superior to Ulysses Grant in several ways, including early successes, war strategies, effectiveness, and leadership.

    Read More

  • Is Marcus Brutus An Honorable Man?

    521 Words  | 2 Pages

    Brutus was not a very good military leader. His action when his army first arrived in

    Read More

  • Attila the Hun

    971 Words  | 2 Pages

    Near Troyes the opposing forces joined battle at Chalons in one of the decisive battles of European history. Though the margin of victory was slim, the Western army prevailed, precipitating Attila’s withdrawal back across the Rhine and avoiding a decisive shift in the course of political and economic development in Western Europe. Attila’s adventures in the West had not ended, however. In the following year he launched a devastating campaign into Italy.

    Read More

  • Hannibal vs. Rome

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    even today for his campaign, the hatred Hannibal felt for Rome was clearly seen on the

    Read More

  • The Civil War of Rome

    2560 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Civil War in the eyes of most people is not glorious, but rather one of the worst crimes you could possibly commit when the state is all-important. Only under the most extreme circumstances should one be allowed to (in the eyes of the people that is) begin a Civil War with just cause. Caesar took this into consideration, but too many things were going wrong in Rome for him not to begin the war.

    Read More

  • Greek Resistance

    582 Words  | 2 Pages

    invading through the mountains of Albania. However, Greeks refused to abandon their territory and fought back, taking a big risk considering the difference between the Greek and Italian army and the caliber the previous one had. Six weeks later, the outcome was extremely u...

    Read More

  • Hannibal Barca

    791 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even before the war started, Hannibal knew what he was going to do. Since Carthage had no navy, there was no hope of going directly from Carthage to Italy over the Mediterranean Sea. Hannibal thought up a dangerous but ingenious plan. In order to get to Italy over land, Hannibal and his army would have to travel from Carthage-controlled Spain across the Alps and into the heart of the enemy. Hannibal left in the cold winter of 218 B.C. with 50,000 infantry, 9,000 cavalry, and 37 war elephants. While crossing the Alps, “Hannibal’s force suffered greatly from the elements and the hostility of the local tribesmen” (Beshara, 3). By the time they reached Italy, after only fourteen days, over 9,000 men had perished along with most of the elephants, but this number was soon replenished after 14,000 northern Gaul rebels joined Hannibal’s army. This group of 60,000 men proved superior to the Roman forces, and after at least three recorded major victories, the Roman senate was exasperated. An army of 80,000 Roman soldiers was sent to stop Hannibal’s army of now 50,000 once and for all. In July of 216 B.C., the Romans engaged the Carthaginians in “the neighborhood of Cannae on the Italian east coast” (Lendering, 2). Greatly outnumbered, Hannibal realized that he would have to win by strategy, and that is exactly what he did. As the two lines met, Hannibal’s cavalry gained the flanks and, moving up the sides, attacked the rear of the Roman line.

    Read More

  • The Expansion of the Roman Empire

    1426 Words  | 3 Pages

    The War with Veii played a significant role in the expansion of the Roman Empire. The war, which ended in 410 B.C., set in motion an entirely different Roman army. No longer was the army a volunteer militia, instead it became a paying and contractual organization. The “Roman victory brought an end to Rome’s most threatening neighbor and began its rise to prominence in the central Italian peninsula” (www.warandgameinfo.com).

    Read More

More about Why Is Hannibal Bad

Open Document