Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why eating meat is morally wrong
Good arguments about eating meat
Good arguments about eating meat
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why eating meat is morally wrong
Is Eating Meat Morally Acceptable? It is common for most people to plan their meals around a good source of protein such as chicken, beef, or pork. In fact, most of us feel like it is very natural and acceptable to do so. However, there is a growing population of people who believe it is highly immoral to slaughter these innocent animals for food. They have created very strong arguments that have made it increasing difficult to justify the morality of killing animals just to satisfy our taste for meat. In order for you to form your own option on the morality of eating. I would like to share with you some of the most common arguments in favor of eating meat as well as the opposing counter arguments. The most common argument for eating meat is that most of us have been brought up eating it and we like the way it tastes or why else were animals put on this planet? Why should we deprive ourselves of this pleasure when this is a stressful world and we need all pleasure we can get? Those against eating meat claim that this is not a good reason to slaughter innocent animals. We are animals, do you think it would be morally acceptable to eat other humans because we liked the taste (Law)? People enjoy the pleasure of sex, however, it would be …show more content…
It provides us with a good source of protein and it has other essential vitamins and minerals, therefore, it is vital for our health (Law). Many believe we need to eat meat because these nutrients are hard to get in a plant based diet. Opposing views claim that it may take a little work but, it is possible to find the right balance of protein, vitamins and minerals to provide healthy nutrition. Vegetarians maintain healthy diets without meat as well as people who practice religions which prohibit eating meat such as, Buddhism and Hinduism and Jainism (Law). It is morally wrong to eat meat when we can survive and thrive without killing a living
Jonathan Safran Foer wrote “Eating Animals” for his son; although, when he started writing it was not meant to be a book (Foer). More specifically to decide whether he would raise his son as a vegetarian or meat eater and to decide what stories to tell his son (Foer). The book was meant to answer his question of what meat is and how we get it s well as many other questions. Since the book is a quest for knowledge about the meat we eat, the audience for this book is anyone that consumes food. This is book is filled with research that allows the audience to question if we wish to continue to eat meat or not and provide answers as to why. Throughout the book Foer uses healthy doses of logos and pathos to effectively cause his readers to question if they will eat meat at their next meal and meals that follow. Foer ends his book with a call to action that states “Consistency is not required, but engagement with the problem is.” when dealing with the problem of factory farming (Foer).
When people are eating meat, have they ever stopped and asked themselves what they 're eating, or what type of life the animal they 're eating went through. The articles “An Animal’s Place” by Michael Pollan, explains the moral issue if it 's correct to consume meat. “The Omnivore 's Delusion: Against the Agri-intellectuals”, by Blake Hurst, defends himself against critics who says negativity about industrial farming and the ways animals are treated. After close examination of both articles, the reader would be able to determine what type of farming is more logical.
When is it ever morally permissible for human beings to kill and eat animals? This is a question in which its answers have been argued since the early period of stoic philosophy up to now with the “rights view.” Known philosophers, Tom Regan and Epictetus use two different moral theories to defend what is morally permissible. Tom Regan uses the “rights view” moral theory to overcome a situation where our moral obligations have to be overridden making it morally permissible to kill and sometimes eat animals. Epictetus’ stoic philosophy argues that Providence gives nonhuman animals to rational human animals (to do what they wish) making it morally permissible for human beings to kill and eat animals in accordance with nature.
In conclusion, eating meat is still unethical, because even with these changes that the cattlemen and ranchers have done over the years, trying to improve the industry, it cannot make up for the damage done. There are animals still suffering and being tortured and more should be done to help them. These are some of the reasons I have for not eating meat; it’s my own personal choice. And I choose to be meat-free.
Is it morally permissible to eat meat? Much argument has arisen in the current society on whether it is morally permissible to eat meat. Many virtuous fruitarians and the other meat eating societies have been arguing about the ethics of eating meat (which results from killing animals). The important part of the dispute is based on the animal welfare, nutrition value from meat, convenience, and affordability of meat-based foods compared to vegetable-based foods and other factors like environmental moral code, culture, and religion. All these points are important in justifying whether humans are morally right when choosing to eat meat. This paper will argue that it is morally impermissible to eat meat by focusing on the treatment of animals, the environmental argument, animal rights, pain, morals, religion, and the law.
For me, the decision to remove meat from my diet stemmed solely from the belief that humans have no right to eat any living creature — period. In short, I believe all lives have equal value, even if they’re a non-human animal. An offshoot from this, which also helped fuel my vegetarianism, includes the horrendous treatment animals endure for the sake of consumption.
“The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that their treatment has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."(Schopenhauer). I always wondered why some people are not so drawn to the consumption of meat and fed up with only one thought about it. Why so many people loathe of blood, and why so few people can easily kill and be slaughter animal, until they just get used to it? This reaction should say something about the most important moments in the code, which was programmed in the human psyche. Realization the necessity of refraining from meat is especially difficult because people consume it for a long time, and in addition, there is a certain attitude to the meat as to the product that is useful, nourishing and even prestigious. On the other hand, the constant consumption of meat has made the vast majority of people completely emotionless towards it. However, there must be some real and strong reasons for refusal of consumption of meat and as I noticed they were always completely different. So, even though vegetarianism has evolved drastically over time, some of its current forms have come back full circle to resemble that of its roots, when vegetarianism was an ethical-philosophical choice, not merely a matter of personal health.
Meat contains many vitamins. Animals will have rights when they have the means to enforce them. They don't have the ability to reason, as humans do. The human race has such a vast understanding of the necessity for all of the different species of animals to exist. Humans are far superior to any other animal because they are so advanced in technology.
Many people don’t believe think anything of what they eat or how it got there. But the harsh truth is the meat that you eat was once a living, breathing creature that had feeling and emotions. Maybe next time you order a steak or chicken nuggets you should think about the animals that went through extreme pain and conditions for you to eat. Not only is it inhumane to put animals through such pain, not eating meat and having a vegetarian lifestyle can have huge benefits to animals, the environment, and your health.
I believe that using animals for food is the only reason for killing animals. They are the best. Some people may argue that meat is not needed in a balanced diet and alternatives to vegetables, fruits, pulses and dairy produce. can be consumed for protein instead, but we have canine teeth. We are suited to eating meat like other carnivorous and omnivorous predators.
For several years the issue of eating meat has been a great concern to all types of people all over the world. In many different societies controversy has began to arise over the morality of eating meat from animals. A lot of the reasons for not eating meat have to deal with religious affiliations, personal health, animal rights, and concern about the environment. Vegetarians have a greater way of expressing meats negative effects on the human body whereas meat eaters have close to no evidence of meat eating being a positive effect on the human body. Being a vegetarian is more beneficial for human beings because of health reasons, environmental issues, and animal rights.
Every person has the ability to make their own choice of whether to eat meat or not. However, eating meat is directly tied to negative health effects, pollution leading to a depletion of ozone, and the depletion of hundreds of thousands of acres of land “wasted” on animal production when they could be used to solve the hunger crisis or lower emission levels. What humans eat is no longer a matter of choice; it has become a matter of life and death. Literally, the future of the whole planet rests on the decision of whether or not to eat meat. If humans chose to eat less meat the world that wouldn’t have to suffer the consequences (outlined above.) Vegetarianism is one possibility, as is Veganism; however the world would be
People have used the argument that eating meat plays an important role in the overall health of a human and it is the way the cycle of life is meant to be, but this is not the case. Eating meat is unnecessary. Becoming a vegetarian could save countless animals from unnecessary suffering, improve human health, and help preserve numerous natural resources.
Let me begin with the words by George Bernard Shaw: ‘Animals are my friends and I don’t eat my friends’. This indicates the ethic aspect of meat consumption. In fact, people often don’t realize how animals are treated, but they can see commercial spots in their TV showing smiling pigs, cows or chickens, happy and ready to be eaten. My impression is that there can’t be anything more cruel and senseless. It is no secret that animals suffer ...
The ethics behind meat eating has always been a very controversial topic. Some say that it's okay to eat meat, such as pork, whereas others say it's not okay to eat it. The topic of eating meat, such as pork, chicken, fish, and beef is an important issue because it deals with what you, personally, think is right and how this issue could possibly have an impact on sentient beings, our health, the environment and more. Knowing the fact behind the ethics of eating meat can you make your own decision on whether or not you choose to eat it.