Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should abortion be legalized
Should abortions be legal
Reason Abortion Is Not Murder
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should abortion be legalized
Abortion should be illegal because it is murder. Almost 700,000 murders have been committed this year through abortions (http://www.numberofabortions.com/). There are numerous reasons that prove abortion is murder. For instance, people may argue that a fetus is only a bundle of cells within the first trimester. However, this can be disproven based on examples of adults today. Should we kill an adult who needs a pacemaker to make their heartbeat the same way fetuses need their mothers’ hearts? Should we kill someone on life support because they cannot function on their own such as a fetus? The answers are clearly no. Therefore, what makes it ok for us to kill these babies. Additionally, life is commonly defined by sentience or potential sentience.
“Sentience is the capacity to feel, perceive, or experience subjectively” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentience). Because this defines what is living, a fetus has potential sentience. This means it has the capacity to perceive but not at the moment. This relates to an adult who is in a coma. When someone is not conscious or able to think, it is no excuse to murder them. By the same token, it is not just that we kill a potentially sentient being. Finally, the legalization of abortion has resulted in an increase in the number of unwanted pregnancies. (https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2004/01/public-health-impact-legal-abortion-30-years-later). Due to the fact that abortion is an option, more people are having unprotected sex. This is because they understand that abortion is an option, therefore they do less to prevent it. In summation, the legalization of abortion has caused millions of murders to these unborn babies, while encouraging unprotected sex. There are numerous viable alternatives to abortion such as adoption or simply keeping the child. Everyone has a right to life.
People debate on a daily basis regarding this, and wonder if Natural Law is correct then how people can have abortions and it not be considered murder. Being based off of three things: (1) It is always wrong to deliberately kill an innocent human being. (2) A fetus is an innocent human being. (3) Therefore, it is always wrong to deliberately kill a fetus. These arguments come from the book, The Fundamentals of Ethics. There is a great deal of bewildering statements in this argument, therefore making it easy to argue. My understanding and answer to this objection is that while some may use one meaning of select words, others use different meaning. In order for one to have an accurate understanding of abortion they must compare using the same category of the select words used. If we are thinking biologically then statement two is correct, therefore, biologically abortion is wrong. If we look at it with a scientific point of view, then abortion is okay. When compared scientifically, then statement one is as if it 's meant for people who oppose pro-choice. Statement one assumes truth of the conclusion it is intended for. Meaning, people without anything to support their opinion other than that statement, has nothing to actually compare. These statements were made for the people that are pro-life and have no standing with people that are
This essay, written by Don Marquis, attempts to undermine general beliefs that anti-abortionist views are simply based on irrational religious or other beliefs. The essay ignores certain special cases of abortion; and mainly purports its focus onto the general arguments against anti-abortionist views by pro-choice holders. Marquis begins by outlining a common argument of anti-abortionists, in which a fetus is seen as being human enough by possessing a genetic code, and is thus necessary and sufficient for dictating that being as a human. This leads to a common conclusion that if a fetus is a human, it must follow to be understood as it being wrong to kill a human. Secondly, he outlines the argument of a pro-choice advocate; which asserts that fetuses are not rational or social beings, therefore it is not a wrongful killing.
Abortion is the killing of the defenseless unborn. Throughout its history this practice has been recognized as a human right for women. Two movements that have emerged from this controversial topic are Pro-Life and Pro-choice. Pro-choice declares that the choice is up to the mother while Pro-life states that the unborn has the right to live. But by examining the history of abortion, court cases it is clear that the killing an unborn is morally wrong and unfair for some.
Whether you are killing a person or just a group of cells. Each side to this argument has points that each contradict each other. As for the people who do think abortion is murder they think that life begins at conception but as for the people who don’t think abortion is murder they believe that a fetus is not a person until the point of viability, when the fetus can exist outside of the mother’s womb. Another contradictory point is the discussion of pain. Some research suggests that fetuses can feel pain at 20 weeks of pregnancy and yet some abortion clinics allow abortions to be performed up to 24 weeks of pregnancy. It is morally wrong to commit murder but most people believe it is not morally wrong to have an abortion. The topic of murder is so controversial because it is difficult for people to understand when life for the child actually starts. There are three main stages in which people believe life starts at, conception, vitality or when the child is actually born and takes its first breath outside of the womb. Speaking in terms of morality, which stage would it be morally correct to murder at? If the answer is only before vitality, how come the other stages are not considered murder? When people discuss abortion as not being murder because it is just a bunch of cells, those are still the same cells at the stage of vitality and when the child is born, those people do not realise that it is still “just a bunch of cells” at each
Mother Theresa once said, “If we accept that a mother can kill her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill each other? Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, rather, to use violence to get what they want” (Ward). Ronald Reagan also once stated, “I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born” (Kurtzman). These widely known Pro-life advocates support the idea that abortion unjustly takes the life of a defenseless human being. The Roe vs. Wade case in 1973 legalized abortion, thus sparking the match to a never ending debate. Pro-life advocates believe that women should not be given the right to an abortion. Giving women the right to an abortion is similar to giving serial killers the right to murder whomever they want. Abortions lead to various health and psychological effects.
Abortion is one of America’s most controversial subjects. The participants in this debate have fixed beliefs on the matter at hand. On one side of the debate are people who believe in pro- choice. They argue that choice of a woman is more important than an unborn fetus. They point out that an unborn child is not on the same level of importance as the mother. Also, the pro-life group declares that choice is the sole purpose behind their argument. They believe that if a woman cannot chose to abolish a pregnancy, then she looses one of her basic human rights. The other side of the debate is the pro-life group. Their main concern is that the fetus is a person; therefore, having the same human rights as the mother. As a result, when states pass laws that enable abortions, these states are legalizing murder. When considering an individual’s ethics and values, killing is morally wrong. Therefore, the termination of unborn children is wrong, as well. Abortion, the unethical expulsion of an embryo or fetus, in order to purposely end a pregnancy, should be forbidden because human life begins at conception, economics is not a justification for abortion, and an unwanted child does not justify abortion.
I have a lot of thoughts about abortion and why it should be illegal everywhere. If there is a heartbeat, and you “abort” it, it should be considered murder. I am simply stating my opinion here and what I think is right from wrong but I will provide solid information and facts to stand my reasoning by why and how I think abortion should be illegal. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, abortion is “the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely following by the death of the embryo or fetus: as a) spontaneous expulsion of a human fetus during the first 12 weeks of gestation b) induced expulsion of a human fetus c) expulsion of a fetus by a domestic animal often due to infection at any time before completion of pregnancy.” It is just flat out a monstrosity. I saw this website about the difference between abortion and murder, it made me think a lot more about this topic and how I truly feel about it. This website asked whether you knew the difference between a “zygote”,” embryo” or a “fetus” and then it continued to show 14 different pictures and asked you to think about which one of those you would consider babies. I went through and all 14 pictures, I would personally consider to be babies. Abortion is legal in every state in the United States. There are multiple ways to do abortions. In the book, Abortion: Questions and Answers, by Dr. J.C. Willke, he divided the methods of abortion in to three categories: ones that invade the uterus and kill the child by instruments which enter the uterus through the cervix; ones that kill the preborn child by administration of drugs and then induce labor and the delivery of a dead baby; and ones that invade the uterus by abdominal surgery. I...
Is abortion murder? Murder is defined as "illegal killing with malice aforethought." Abortion fails this definition for two reasons. First, abortion is not illegal, and second, there is no evidence to suggest that expecting mothers feel malice towards their own flesh and blood.
Why abortion? When thinking about abortion and reasons people do it, the first thing that probably comes to mind is that it is done because of age, being too young, having school to worry about first, finding ways to finish school, having a baby and not being able to afford it, and even just because the mother does not want to be a single parent and have to worry about all those things by herself. Abortion should be illegal because the reasons people abort are mainly just excuses, it can have serious long-term effects on women, or because of political and religious views.
In my argumentative coursework I am arguing that abortion is wrong and not to be mistaken with 'Abortion should be made illegal.' I will explain later why I have made this statement. Abortion is the termination of an unborn child in its mother's womb for up to twenty four weeks of the pregnancy or in special circumstances e.g. Disability diagnosis a termination right up until the mother goes in to labour. I think the above definition is an easier and less harsh way of saying that abortion is the murdering of a human being. There are several reasons why abortion is legal and several reasons why it shouldn?t be.
Abortion by definition is a medical procedure used to end a pregnancy and cause the death of the fetus. This act of killing the fetus has been legal in the United States since the supreme court case Roe V. Wade in 1973. While this may be a touchy subject, it is an issue that needs to be addressed immediately. It is a social injustice that has killed millions of babies since the legalization of abortion, but by making it illegal and educating the public, the number of abortions would reduce and the lives of so many innocent babies would be saved.
A mother kills her unborn child because it is unwanted, but she's not charged for murder. Is it right? There is about 46 million abortions per year worldwide, and approximately 115,000 per day, but why? Is it because rape or incest, health problems with either the mother or the child, or just because the baby's unwanted or inconvenient at the time? (The Alan Guttmacher Institute.) Abortion should be banned because too many babies are being killed from abortion, if you don't want a child you could always put it up for adoption, and most mothers don't understand the consequences that occur from abortion.
Everyone has a right to live. Some people are not given this opportunity. They don’t experience life. They don’t know what life is. Abortion kills around 40-50 million little lives around the world each year, putting a stamp on their grave, UNWANTED. Why do we make life unfair for others? Why do we end life before it has begun? Why are we killing the new generation? The biggest question is why is abortion legal?
Life is a magical and rewarding thing to experience, yet millions of new little souls are losing their privilege to live. Every life starts out as being an embryo, then moves on to being a fetus. However, there is no medical proof on when a fetus is considered to be a living being. No matter what kind of medical proof comes out, that is a life being developed. Those people who plan on aborting their tiny bundle of joy are making the cruelest mistake. Their kid could have been adopted by loving parents or could have even found the cure to cancer. Therefore, abortion should not be performed because taking away a life is never the answer.
If killing unborn babies are allowed, why murdering a person is illegal? There is no right to everyone in the world to even think of murdering innocent babies. Some people say Fetus is not a child? That’s wrong. Fetus is proven to be a human life. Just because they can not ...