Why I Wrote The Crucible Analysis

449 Words1 Page

After reading “Why I Wrote The Crucible,” it gave me a greater understanding of the play. It also betters your knowledge as to why it was written in the 1950’s but set in Salem 1692. Arthur Miller contrast these two time periods to show that even though they’re set in different times, they manage to remain the same. Although this play was written in 1953 and set in Salem 1692, it all had a significant purpose. By using the Salem witch trials as an example, it helped us understand what was happening, especially about the McCarthy hunt. The McCarthy hunt was on a search for Communist that were accusing Americans of false actions. By that, they would trick many innocent people to confessing what they were trying to hide. Many feared these communist and their acts of wrong doing which then led to others accusing one another of things that were false. …show more content…

In The Crucible, Danforth and Giles argue back and forth in the court room about the lack of proof. “Giles: I will not give you no name. I stand mute.” “Danforth: In that case, I have no choice but to arrest you for contempt of this court, do you know that (Miller 96)?” This goes to show that they had a zero tolerance rule when it came to proof and stating the truth because it was strictly the law. The entire play was based upon these laws they had to follow due to the consequences if they did not. In the 1950’s (The McCarthy Era), Senator Joseph McCarthy became feared by many. He would put someone on trial, and expect them to confess up, if not done they would be punished and

Open Document