Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Difference between herodotus and thucydides
Infant mortality case studies
Essay on infant mortality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Difference between herodotus and thucydides
Historian Mark Golden argues in his article, “Did the Ancients Care when their Children Died?”, that there is little evidence supporting that Romans and other ancient parents failed to care for their children or to mourn their loss. A child’s death is used as an example of tragedy throughout ancient texts such as those written by Herodotus and Thucydides. Parents took great measure to ensure their children’s survival. This is seen in the usage of amulets, dog dung, skin and teeth of wolves and many others to avert diseases and other misfortunes. In his article Golden references Lawrence Stones argument that “affection and love were not to be expected in pre-industrial populations because high mortality made emotional commitment, especially
to children, too dangerous for individuals and insupportable for their societies.” To stone this means that parents limited their contact with their children, such as putting their children in the hands of wet-nurses. This results to neglect. Golden does not seem to keen on this idea. He states that this is customary in ancient times to entrust children to wet-nurses, but that does not conclude parents did not care for their children. In fact he continues on to say that children, especially those who are at risk, are left in constant contact with their caregiver that would see to their every need. This to him is proof that the ancient parent He quotes Campbell’s analysis that ‘Children from the day of their birth are the centre of attention and interest in the family. The needs of the infant take priority over all others.”
In modern society, both the abstract and concrete representations of children are intertwined with the themes associated with happiness, innocence, ignorance, gullibility, and the allure of youth. But, if I may for a moment mimic Caroline Vout’s presentation of her arguments by asking, how does today’s current view of children differ from the non-linguistic representations of children in ancient times? If one was to rewind time while focusing solely on the exemplification of children in ancient Greek and Rome, they would discover that presumably there is a degradation of the importance of the child in society. The previously mentioned Caroline Vout supplies the fact that the great philosopher Aristotle believed that “[children were] virtually denied human status on the grounds of their diminished faculty of deliberation.” This thought process is obviously contradictory to the widely accepted opinion of children in today’s modern society. With the assistance of multiple sculptures, frescos, and drawings, Vout utilizes rhetorical questions to engage the reader in her arguments concerning the portrayal of children during the Hellenistic period.
Marriage in Classical Athens was inevitable. It was a part of life. Everyone had to get married, just as everyone had to someday face death. Although most people would not see a connection between marriage and death, the Greeks did. Both define an irreversible physical change—the loss of virginity and the loss of life. This idea of loss, rebirth, and renewal are present in both wedding and funeral. This is evident in the way wedding and funeral ceremonies complement each other in character and content. Both ceremonies are interwoven with ritual meaning and overlapping rites.
"Two households, both alike in dignity, / In fair Verona, where we lay our scene, / From ancient grudge brakes to new mutiny, / Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean. / From forth the fatal lions of these foes / A pair of star-crossed lovers take their life; / Whose misadventured piteous overthrows / Doth with their death bury their parent’s strife. / The fearful passage of their death-marked love, / And the continuance of their parent’s rage, / Which, but their children’s end, naught could remove…" -The Prologue, Romeo and Juliet (by William Shakespeare).
Tragedy is an inevitable part of life. Everyone encounters it at some point in life. It is a darkness that befalls even the best of people and can present itself in many different ways. Yann Martel's Life of Pi and Shakespeare’s Hamlet both deal with the ultimate tragedy of death. Both Hamlet and Pi undergo the loss of loved ones; however, they handle these tragic events differently. Pi overcomes his losses by remaining positive and treasuring the gift of life, whereas Hamlet lets sadness consume him and makes death the centerpiece of his character. In this way, both Shakespeare and Martel make firm statements, suggesting that a positive outlook on life will afford one the greatest possibility to overcome even the most traumatic of events.
I perceive the value of human life as invaluable. Your text enables me to envision how life would be without the comfort and security of civilization. The man’s views on life are judged by his experiences and his sole objective is to keep him and the boy alive. The father repeatedly promises himself and the boy that he would do anything for him. “My job is to take care of you. I was appointed to do that by God. I will kill anyone who touches you.” (pg 80).The boy returns the act of concern that the man has for him. The boy puts a large emphasis on that the man also must eat and drink ‘you to’. His compassion and willingness to help others in need brings conflict between him and his father. “Cant we help him? Papa? No. We cant help him.” (pg 51) The difference of the father’s practicability and the boy’s compassion is predominant. The text reinforces the idea that all life is sacred and important.
If you love your child, the death of your child is more painful than the death of any of your loved ones, including one’s own parents. And because of this devastation, I do not wish this pain even to my enemies.
Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is a play well known by all for its death and demise of its characters, as well as its tragic ending that leaves two star-crossed lovers to their fate. The true misfortune of Romeo and Juliet is that individually they ultimately all lose, however together, everyone wins. A tragedy is defined as an event causing great suffering, destruction and distress usually concerning the downfall of the main character. To lose is defined as causing someone to fail to gain something or to suffer. Death is a major subject in the play and significantly establishes the mood of the scene. These disastrous events affect everyone including ones mourning the death of their loved ones. However, there are also positive themes that
It is inferred that the parents should take care of their children and have their best interest at heart. This however, is not the case in Greek and Roman mythology. The killing of ones own children, or filicide, was not viewed as negative upon in their era. The contemporary times contrast with the ancient Greek and Roman’s because it was justified to use any means necessary to obtain a higher status. The Greeks and Romans valued keeping a high social reputation and having respect for those of great power. The motherly union between their children conflict with the reality that the father strives to retain or gain control. These circumstances cause a tense bond between the members of the family. The strained parent to child relationship in Greco-Roman myths is prevalent in the fact that the parents are fearful of being overtaken by their children, and endeavor to limit their upbringing.
Two lovers took their own lives to avoid the consequences, and in contrast while a man gouged his eyes out to deal with his flaw. Although Romeo and Juliet and Oedipus the King were great tragedies, Oedipus the King contains more of the tragic figures described in Aristotle’s definition. First, the protagonist endured uncommon suffering. Second, the tragic hero recognized the consequences of their actions and took responsibility for them. Third and lastly, the audience experienced catharsis. Ignorance and impulsiveness can cause one to stumble and it can ultimately lead to their fate.
During the early seventeenth century, poets were able to mourn the loss of a child publicly by writing elegies, or poems to lament the deceased. Katherine Philips and Ben Jonson were two poets who wrote the popular poems “On the Death of My Dearest Child, Hector Philips”, “On My First Son”, and “On My First Daughter” respectively. Although Philips and Jonson’s elegies contain obvious similarities, the differences between “On the Death of My Dearest Child” and “On My First Son” specifically are pronounced. The emotions displayed in the elegies are very distinct when considering the sex of the poet. The grief shown by a mother and father is a major theme when comparing the approach of mourning in the two elegies.
Love, in classical Greek literature, is commonly considered a prominent theme. Love, in present days, always appears in the categories of books, movies, music, etc. Interpreted differently by different people, Love turns into a multi-faceted being. In Plato’s work Symposium, Phaedrus, Pausania, Eryximachus, Aristophane and Agathon, each of them presents a speech to either praise or definite Love. Phaedrus first points out that Love is the primordial god; Pausanias brings the theme of “virtue” into the discussion and categorizes Love into “good” one or “bad” one; Eryximachus introduces the thought of “moderation’ and thinks that Love governs such fields as medicine and music; Aristophanes draws attention to the origin and purposes of Love; Agathon enunciates that the correct way to present an eulogy is first to praise its nature and gifts.
efining tragedy is not an easy task because it has meant different things at different times. Aristotle writes in the Poetics that tragedies must represent a complete, serious, and important action that rouses and then purges (by catharsis) fear and pity in the spectators, with a central character who moves from happiness to misery through some frailty or error (hamartia). There is still much debate regarding the precise translation and application of these terms. It is supposed that the word “tragedy” comes from the Greek tragoidia or goat-play, and it is based on the assumption that the tragic hero is essentially another version of the sacrifice offered throughout human history to indulge an angry god.
“Everyman” in this late English 15th century morality play, several ideas have been given a personal discussion since they appear to have natural application in the states of goodness among people. However, the topic of perception of the death and the treatment of death is paramount in the play. Death has formed a essential part of the play in that the absence of death would mean that there is no play at all. Everyman tries to defy death for the rest of the play. Death enables Everyman to be instructive and illuminative. The author has explored and adored death with certain specialties as being a cruel judge, a messenger of God, and a rescuer of humanity. The treatment and perception of death are paramount in that it is enormously incubated
In Jesus’ time, as in ours, shame and death and grief were common. But the economic, political, and social realities caused by Roman control of the Mediterranean basin often worsened the grief of the people, and increased the likelihood that some of them—particularly the poor and destitute—would experience grief too soon and too often. Rome—the Roman Empire—made matters worse. Those who mourned in public were seen as shameful in the culture of Jesus’ day, but Jesus called the mourners honorable because he knew that public grieving functions as a protest against an unjust world. Jesus declares that God's divine reign will bring consolation and laughter to those who mourn— a bold proclamation of a divine intervention into history that upends the status quo. Jesus also challenges those who live lives of unconcerned joy, lacking awareness of those who mourn. We cannot live lives of laughter when our sisters and brothers are mourning and weeping. We
Imagine growing up without a father. Imagine a little girl who can’t run to him for protection when things go wrong, no one to comfort her when a boy breaks her heart, or to be there for every monumental occasion in her life. Experiencing the death of a parent will leave a hole in the child’s heart that can never be filled. I lost my father at the young of five, and every moment since then has impacted me deeply. A child has to grasp the few and precious recollections that they have experienced with the parent, and never forget them, because that’s all they will ever have. Families will never be as whole, nor will they forget the anguish that has been inflicted upon them. Therefore, the sudden death of a parent has lasting effects on those